Skip to main content
Top

02-01-2015 | Gynecologic cancers | Book chapter | Article

33. Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer

Author: David Cibula, MD, PhD

Publisher: Springer London

Abstract

Radical hysterectomy belongs to classical procedures in gynecological oncology with a history longer than a hundred years. The surgical technique and the role of radical hysterectomy in the management of cervical cancer have been developing dramatically and are still in progress. A commonly accepted indication is the treatment of cervical cancer stage IB1, in which radical hysterectomy achieves excellent oncological outcomes. Ongoing randomized trials are validating the possibility of abandoning parametria resection and replacing radical with simple hysterectomy in selected subgroups of patients with small tumors of IB1 stage. Surgical treatment can achieve satisfactory outcomes also in the management of locally advanced tumors of stages IB2, IIA and selected IIB on the condition that adequate radicality of hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy is performed.
Acceptance of harmonized terminology and a unified classification system is a challenging task for the specialty to enable comprehensive collaboration and further research. The ABCD classification system represents a modern and simple solution which recognizes four types of radical hysterectomy (B, C1, C2, D), including nerve sparing modification. A critical parameter for the classification is the resection extent of all three parts of parametria.
The extent of parametrectomy, particularly in vertical dimension, is the crucial factor for early and late morbidity. The most significant symptom in the early postoperative period is a failure of spontaneous voiding, while bladder dysfunctions, including urinary incontinence and impairment of bladder sensation, belong to common late postoperative complications. Quality of life can be also compromised due to less frequent symptoms such as anorectal dysfunctions, mainly constipation and flatulence incontinence as well as sexual dysfunctions.
Literature
1.
Baalbergen A, Smedts F, Helmerhorst TJ. Conservative therapy in microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix is justified: an analysis of 59 cases and a review of the literature. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21(9):1640–5.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Barnes W, Waggoner S, Delgado G, Maher K, Potkul R, Barter J, Benjamin S. Manometric characterization of rectal dysfunction following radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 1991;42:116–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Benedetti-Panici P, Zullo MA, Plotti F, Manci N, Muzii L, Angioli R. Long-term bladder function in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and type 3–4 radical hysterectomy. Cancer. 2004;100:2110–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Bergmark K, Avall-Lundqvist E, Dickman PW, Henningsohn L, Steineck G. Vaginal changes and sexuality in women with a history of cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(18):1383–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Buda A, Pellegrino A, Vitobello D, Meroni MG, Recalcati D, Perego P. Total laparoscopic radical parametrectomy, partial colpectomy, and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with occult cervical cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;107(1):73–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Charoenkwan K, Srisomboon J, Suprasert P, Tantipalakorn C, Kietpeerakool C. Nerve-sparing class III radical hysterectomy: a modified technique to spare the pelvic autonomic nerves without compromising radicality. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16:1705–12.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Charoenkwan K, Pranpanas S. Prevalence and characteristics of late postoperative voiding dysfunction in early-stage cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2007;8:387–9.PubMed
8.
Cibula D, Sláma J, Velechovská P, Fischerova D, Zikán M, Pinkavová I, Hill M. Factors affecting spontaneous voiding recovery after radical hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010;20(4):685–90.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Cibula D, Velechovska P, Sláma J, et al. Late morbidity following nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116(3):506–11.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Cibula D, Abu-Rustum NR, Benedetti-Panici P, et al. New classification system of radical hysterectomy: emphasis on a three-dimensional anatomic template for parametrial resection. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;122(2):264–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Cibula D, Pinkavova I, Dusek L, et al. Local control after tailored surgical treatment of early cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21(4):690–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Cibula D, Abu-Rustum NR, Dusek L, et al. Prognostic significance of low volume sentinel lymph node disease in early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124(3):496–501.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Clark JG. A more radical method of performing hysterectomy for cancer of the uterus. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1895;6:120.
14.
Ditto A, Martinelli F, Hanozet F, et al. Class III NSRH: oncological outcome in 170 cervical cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;119:192–7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Donovan KA, Taliaferro LA, Alvarez EM, Jacobsen PB, Roetzheim RG, Wenham RM. Sexual health in women treated for cervical cancer: characteristics and correlates. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;104(2):428–34.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Epstein E, Testa A, Gaurilcikas A, et al. Early-stage cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound—a European multicenter trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;128(3):449–53.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Ercoli A, Delmas V, Gadonneix P, Fanfani F, Villet R, Paparella P, Manusco S, Scambia G. Classical and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: an evaluation of the risk of injury to the autonomous pelvic nerves. Surg Radiol Anat. 2003;25:200–6.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Fischerova D, Cibula D, Stenhova H, et al. Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of early cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008;18(4):766–72.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Fotiou S, Tserkezoglou A, Hatzieleftheriou G, Apostolikas N. Class III vs. class II radical hysterectomy in stage IB cervical carcinoma: a comparison of morbidity and survival. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1997;7:17–21.CrossRef
20.
Freund WA. Eine neue methode der exstirpation des ganten uterus. Zentralbl Gynakol. 1878;10:222.
21.
Frumovitz M, Sun CC, Schmeler KM, Deavers MT, Dos Reis R, Levenback CF, Ramirez PT. Parametrial involvement in radical hysterectomy specimens for women with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(1):93–9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Fujii S, Takakura K, Matsumura N, Higuchi T, Yura S, Mandai M, Baba T, Yoshika S. Anatomic identification and functional outcomes of the nerve sparing Okabayashi radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107:4–13.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Geetha P, Nair MK. Laparoscopic, robotic and open method of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review. J Minim Access Surg. 2012;8(3):67–73.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
24.
Geisler JP, Orr C, Manahan KJ. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical parametrectomy and radical vaginectomy. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2011;32(6):674–6.PubMed
25.
Gil-Ibáñez B, Díaz-Feijoo B, Pérez-Benavente A, Puig-Puig O, Franco-Camps S, Centeno C, Xercavins J, Gil-Moreno A. Nerve sparing technique in robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy: results. Int J Med Robot. 2013;9:339–44.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Höckel M, Horn LC, Manthey N, Braumann UD, Wolf U, Teichmann G, Frauenschläger K, Dornhöfer N, Einenkel J. Resection of the embryologically defined uterovaginal(Müllerian) compartment and pelvic control in patients with cervical cancer: a prospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(7):683–92.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Hou J, Goldberg GL, Qualls CR, Kuo DY, Forman A, Smith HO. Risk factors for poor prognosis in microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix (IA1 and IA2): a pooled analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;121(1):135–42.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Jensen PT, Groenvold M, Klee MC, Thranov I, Petersen MA, Machin D. Early-stage cervical carcinoma, radical hysterectomy, and sexual function. A longitudinal study. Cancer. 2004;100(1):97–106.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Katahira A, Niikura H, Ito K, Takano T, Nagase S, Murakami G, Yaegashi N. Vesicouterine ligament contains abundant autonomic nerve ganglion cells: the distribution in histology concerning nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008;18:193–8.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Kato T, Murakami G, Yabuki Y. Does the cardinal ligament of the uterus contain a nerve that should be preserved in radical hysterectomy? Anat Sci Int. 2002;77:161–8.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Koehler C, Gottschalk E, Chiantera V, Marnitz S, Hasenbein K, Schneider A. From laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy to vaginal assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy. BJOG. 2012;119(2):254–62.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Kohlberger PD, Edwards L, Collins C, Milross C, Hacker NF. Laparoscopic port-site recurrence following surgery for a stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix with negative lymph nodes. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;79(2):324–6.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Landoni F, Maneo A, Cormio G, Perego P, Milani R, Caruso O. Class II versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB—IIA cervical cancer: a prospective randomised study. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;80:3–12.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Latzko W, Schiffmann J. Klinisches and anatomisches zur radikaloperation des gebarmutterkrebses. Zentralbl Gynakol. 1919;43:715.
35.
Leath 3rd CA, Straughn JM, Bhoola SM, Partridge EE, Kilgore LC, Alvarez RD. The role of radical parametrectomy in the treatment of occult cervical carcinoma after extrafascial hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;92(1):215–9.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Li J, Xu H, Chen Y, Wang D, Li Y, Liang Z. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical parametrectomy for occult early-stage invasive cervical cancer after simple hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012;22(8):1383–8.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Maas CP, ter Kuile MM, Laan E, Tuijnman CC, Weijenborg PT, Trimbos JB, Kenter GG. Objective assessment of sexual arousal in women with a history of hysterectomy. BJOG. 2004;111(5):456–62.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Magrina JF, Magtibay PM. Robotic nerve-sparing radical parametrectomy: feasibility and technique. Int J Med Robot. 2012;8(2):206–9.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Meigs JV. The Wertheim operation for carcinoma of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1945;49:542.
40.
Naik R, Jackson KS, Lopes A, Cross P, Henry JA. Laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy—a randomised phase II trial: perioperative outcomes and surgicopathological measurements. BJOG. 2010;117(6):746–51.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Okabayashi H. Radical abdominal hysterectomy for cancer of the cervix uteri. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1921;33:335.
42.
Pálfalvi L, Ungár L. Laterally extended parametrectomy (LEP), the technique for radical pelvic side wall dissection: feasibility, technique and results. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003;13(6):914–7.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT, Nam JH. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for elderly patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(3):195.e1–8.CrossRef
44.
Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT, Nam JH. Laparoscopic compared with open radical hysterectomy in obese women with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(6):1201–9.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Park SY, Bae DS, Nam JH, et al. Quality of life and sexual problems in disease-free survivors of cervical cancer compared with the general population. Cancer. 2007;110(12):2716–25.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Pieterse QD, Maas CP, Ter Kuile MM, Lowik M, Van Eijkeren MA, Trimbos JBMZ, Kenter GG. An observational longitudinal study to evaluate miction, defecation, and sexual function after radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymhadenectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16:1119–29.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Pieterse QD, Ter Kuile MM, Deruiter MC, Trimbos JB, Kenter GG, Maas CP. Vaginal blood flow after radical hysterectomy with and without nerve sparing. A preliminary report. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008;18(3):576–83.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Pikaart DP, Holloway RW, Ahmad S, Finkler NJ, Bigsby GE, Ortiz BH, DeNardis SA. Clinical-pathologic and morbidity analyses of types 2 and 3 abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107:205–10.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Pinkavova I, Fischerova D, Zikan M, et al. Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of tumor size after application of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(6):705–12.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Pluta M, Rob L, Charvat M, Chmel R, Halaska Jr M, Skapa P, Robova H. Less radical surgery than radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;113(2):181–4.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Possover M, Stober S, Plaul K, Schneider A. Identification and preservation of the motoric innervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy type III. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;79:154–7.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Querleu D, Morrow CP. Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:297–303.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Ralph G, Winter R, Michelitsch L, Tamussino K. Radicality of parametrial resection and dysfunction of the lower urinary tract after radical hysterectomy. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1991;12:27–30.PubMed
54.
Ramirez PT, Schmeler KM, Wolf JK, Brown J, Soliman PT. Robotic radical parametrectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with invasive cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111(1):18–21.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Fontanelli R, et al. Type II versus type III nerve sparing radical hysterectomy: comparison of lower urinary tract dysfunctions. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;102:256–62.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Sauter, Johann Nepomuk. Die gänzliche Extirpation der carcinomatösen Gebärmutter: ohne selbst entstandenen oder künstlich bewirkten Vorfall vorgenommen und glücklich vollführt. Constanz: W. Wallis, 1822. 188 s.
57.
Schauta F. Die erweiterte vaginale Totalexstirpation des Uterus beim Kollumkarzinom. Wien: Verlag von J. Safar; 1908.
58.
Sert B. Robotic port-site and pelvic recurrences after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for a stage IB1 adenocarcinoma of the cervix with negative lymph nodes. Int J Med Robot. 2010;6(2):132–5.PubMed
59.
Sert MB, Abeler V. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: comparison with total laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy; one surgeon’s experience at the Norwegian Radium Hospital. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;121(3):600–4.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Sood AK, Nygaard I, Shahin MS, Sorosky JI, Lutgendorf SK, Rao SSC. Anorectal dysfunction after surgical treatment for cervical cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195:513–9.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Tinelli R, Malzoni M, Cosentino F, Perone C, Fusco A, Cicinelli E, Nezhat F. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(9):2622–8.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Trimbos JB, Maas CP, Deruiter MC, Peters AA, Kenter GG. A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2001;11:180–6.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Schmeler KM, Frumovitz M, Ramirez PT. Conservative management of early stage cervical cancer: is there a role for less radical surgery? Gynecol Oncol. 2011;120(3):321–5.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
64.
van Dam JH, Gosselink MJ, Drogendijk AC, Hop WCJ, Schouten WR. Changes in bowel function after hysterectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:1342–7.CrossRefPubMed
65.
van Meurs H, Visser O, Buist MR, Ten Kate FJ, van der Velden J. Frequency of pelvic lymph node metastases and parametrial involvement in stage IA2 cervical cancer: a population-based study and literature review. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19(1):21–6.CrossRefPubMed
66.
Vrzackova P, Weiss P, Cibula D. Sexual morbidity following radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2010;10(7):1037–42.CrossRefPubMed
67.
Wertheim E. The extended abdominal operation for carcinoma uteri (based on 500 operative cases). Am J Obstet Dis Women Child. 1912;66:169–232.
68.
Wertheim E. Zur frag der radikaloperation beim uteruskrebs. Arch Gynakol. 1900;61:627.CrossRef
69.
Zullo MA, Manci N, Angioli R, Muzii L, Benedetti-Panici P. Vesical dysfunctions after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a critical review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003;48:287–93.CrossRefPubMed