Skip to main content
Top

27-11-2013 | Skin cancers | Book chapter | Article

95. Imaging Findings in Melanoma

Author: Roxani D. Efthymiadou

Publisher: Springer Milan

Abstract

Cutaneous melanoma, the most serious type of skin cancer, may spread almost to any organ of the body. Early detection and accurate staging are of critical value for the appropriate treatment and patient’s prognosis. Imaging modalities as ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic tomography, lymphoscintigraphy, bone scan, and PET-CT play an essential role in staging of patients with melanoma. Computed tomography (CT) is the method of choice for staging of patients with melanoma, especially in TNM stage III or in recurrence of the disease. Ultrasound (US) has not been widely used and may have a complementary role in selected cases. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is superior compared to CT for the evaluation of the brain, the spinal canal, the musculoskeletal system, and the parenchymatous abdominal organs. Lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy are indicated for the initial staging of clinically node-negative cases of melanoma and also for the patients being at risk for regional node spread. SLN biopsy is recommended for stage IA disease with adverse histological characteristics, stage IB and stage II disease. PET-CT has turned out to be more accurate than CT in N and in M initial staging and can replace conventional imaging in stage III and IV metastatic melanoma.
Literature
1.
King DM (2004) Imaging of metastatic melanoma. J HK Coll Radiol 7:66–69
2.
Meyers MO, Yeh JJ, Frank J et al (2009) Method of detection of initial recurrence of stage II/III cutaneous melanoma: analysis of the utility of follow-up staging. Ann Surg Oncol 16(4):941PubMedCrossRef
3.
Mohr P, Eggermont AM, Hauschild A et al (2009) Staging of cutaneous melanoma. Ann Oncol 20(suppl 6):vi14–21
4.
Fishman EK, Kuhlman JE, Schuchter LM et al (1990) CT of malignant melanoma in the chest, abdomen, and musculoskeletal system. Radiographics 10(4):603PubMedCrossRef
5.
Escott EJ (2001) A variety of appearances of malignant melanoma in the head: a review. RadioGraphics 21:625–639
6.
Voit C, Van Akkooi AC, Schäfer-Hesterberg G et al (2010) Ultrasound morphology criteria predict metastatic disease of the sentinel nodes in patients with melanoma. J Clin Oncol 28(5):847PubMedCrossRef
7.
Pfannenberg C, Aschoff P, Schanz S et al (2007) Prospective comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in staging of advanced malignant melanoma. Eur J Cancer 43(3):557PubMedCrossRef
8.
Strobel K, Dummer R, Husarik DB et al (2007) High-risk melanoma: accuracy of FDG PET/CT with added CT morphologic information for detection of metastases. Radiology 244(2):566PubMedCrossRef
9.
Reinhardt MJ, Joe AY, Jaeger U, Huber A et al (2006) Diagnostic performance of whole body dual modality 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for N- and M-staging of malignant melanoma: experience with 250 consecutive patients. J Clin Oncol 24(7):1178PubMedCrossRef
10.
Jiménez-Requena F, Delgado-Bolton RC, Fernández-Pérez C et al (2010) Meta-analysis of the performance of (18)F-FDG PET in cutaneous melanoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37(2):284PubMedCrossRef