Skip to main content
Top

22-06-2013 | Skin cancers | Book chapter | Article

13. Dermoscopy

Authors: Susana Puig, MD, PhD, Joseph Malvehy, MD

Publisher: Springer New York

Abstract

Dermoscopy (also known as dermatoscopy and epiluminescence microscopy) is a noninvasive, in vivo technique that has demonstrated to be an important aid in the early recognition of malignant melanoma and other skin tumors. Its use increases diagnostic accuracy of malignant melanoma between 5 and 30 % over clinical visual inspection depending on the type of skin lesion and the experience of the physician. At the present days, the use of dermoscopy in the evaluation of any skin tumor has a maximum level of evidence and included as standard of care in clinical guidelines of melanoma.
Glossary
Atypical Mole Syndrome (AMS)
is the most important phenotypic risk factor for developing cutaneous melanoma. It is otherwise known as heritable melanoma syndrome; it refers to a group of patients who appear to inherit a tendency to develop dysplastic naevi. This inheritance appears to follow an autosomal dominant pattern
Cross-polarization filter
in dermoscopy, is the system by which skin can be visualized through the stratum corneum without the need of applying immersion liquids. The scattered light from the deep tissue structures has altered its polarization and can pass through the filter for imaging. Cross-polarization cancels out the light that is being reflected by the skin surface, thus allowing a deep, glare-free view into the skin–without immersion fluids
Cyclin-dependent Kinase Inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A)
Acts as a tumor suppressor. In MM, disease susceptibility is associated with variations affecting this gene. In familial atypical multiple mole melanoma-pancreatic carcinoma syndrome (FAMMMPC) mutation carriers within families may develop either or both types of cancer. In melanoma-astrocytoma syndrome (MASTS), disease is caused by mutations affecting this gene
DFU
Digital dermatoscopy follow-up
GPs
General practitioners
Non-polarized light dermoscopy
requires oil or gel for contact. Gives brighter images. It allows a better visualization of milialike cysts and comedolike (more helpful for identification of seborrheic keratosis) and peppering, lighter colors, and blue-white areas are also more evident, facilitating recognition of regression areas. It is a complement to
Polarized light dermoscopy
requires no contact. With PD, melanin appeared darker and blue nevi had more shades of blue; vessels and red areas are better visualized as well as shiny-white streaks
TBP
Total body photography
Tyndall effect
also known as Tyndall scattering, is light scattering by particles in a colloid or suspension. The preferential absorption of long light wavelengths by melanin and the scattering of shorter wavelengths, representing the blue end of the spectrum, by collagen bundles gives a blue color to those lesions where melanin is localized within the reticular dermis
Literature
1.
Vestergaard ME, Macaskill P, Holt PE, Menzies SW. Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159:669–76.PubMed
2.
Bafounta ML, Beauchet A, Aegerter P, Saiag P. Is dermoscopy (epiluminescence microscopy) useful for the diagnosis of melanoma? Results of a meta-analysis using techniques adapted to the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Arch Dermatol. 2001;137:1343–50.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Binder M, Schwarz M, Winkler A, Steiner A, Kaider A, Wolff K, et al. Epiluminescence microscopy. A useful tool for the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions for formally trained dermatologists. Arch Dermatol. 1995;131:286–91.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Argenziano G, Soyer HP, Chimenti S, Talamini R, Corona R, Sera F, et al. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: results of a consensus meeting via the Internet. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48:679–93.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Mayer J. Systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of dermatoscopy in detecting malignant melanoma. Med J Aust. 1997;167:206–10.PubMed
6.
Binder M, Puespoeck-Schwarz M, Steiner A, Kittler H, Muellner M, Wolff K, et al. Epiluminescence microscopy of small pigmented skin lesions: short-term formal training improves the diagnostic performance of dermatologists. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;36:197–202.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Westerhoff K, McCarthy WH, Menzies SW. Increase in the sensitivity for melanoma diagnosis by primary care physicians using skin surface microscopy. Br J Dermatol. 2000;143:1016–20.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Braun RP, Rabinovitz HS, Oliviero M, Kopf AW, Saurat JH. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;52:109–21.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Malvehy J, Puig S. Principles of dermoscopy. Barcelona: CEGE; 2002.
11.
Malvehy J, Puig S, Braun R, Marghoob A, Kopf A. Handbook of dermoscopy. Boca Ratón: Taylor & Francis; 2006. ISBN 0-415-384907 and 978-0-415-38490-2.CrossRef
12.
http://​www.​genomel.​org/​dermoscopy/​ (see videos in learning how to use dermoscopy effectively).
13.
Malvehy J, Puig S. Follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions with digital total-body photography and digital dermoscopy: a two-step method. Clin Dermatol. 2002;20:297–304.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Salerni G, Carrera C, Lovatto L, Puig-Butille JA, Badenas C, Plana E, Puig S, Malvehy J. Benefits of total body photography and digital dermatoscopy (“two-step method of digital follow-up”) in the early diagnosis of melanoma in patients at high risk for melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67(1):e17–27.PubMed
15.
Zalaudek I, Leinweber B, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Soyer HP. The impact of dermoscopic-pathologic correlates in the diagnosis and management of pigmented skin tumors. Exp Rev Dermatol. 2006;4:579–87.CrossRef
16.
Seidenari S, Pellacani G, Martella A. Acquired melanocytic lesions and the decision to excise: role of color variegation and distribution as assessed by dermoscopy. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31:184–9.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Ferrara G, Soyer HP, Malvehy J, et al. The many faces of blue nevus: a clinicopathologic study. J Cutan Pathol. 2007;34:543–51.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, Ferrara G, et al. Clinically equivocal melanocytic skin lesions with features of regression: a dermoscopic-pathological study. Br J Dermatol. 2004;150:64–71.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Lovato L, Salerni G, Puig S, Carrera C, Palou J, Malvehy J. Adult xanthogranuloma mimicking basal cell carcinoma: dermoscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy and pathological correlation. Dermatology. 2010;220(1):66–70.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zaballos P, Llambrich A, Ara M, Olazaran Z, Malvehy J, Puig S. Dermoscopic findings of haemosiderotic and aneurysmal dermatofibroma: report of six patients. Br J Dermatol. 2006;154(2):244–50.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Menzies SW, Ingvar C, McCarthy WH. A sensitivity and specificity analysis of the surface microscopy features of invasive melanoma. Melanoma Res. 1996;6(1):55–62.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Argenziano G, Zalaudek I, Ferrara G, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Soyer HP. Proposal of a new classification system for melanocytic naevi. Br J Dermatol. 2007;157:217–27.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zalaudek I, Manzo M, Ferrara G, Argenziano G. A new classification of melanocytic nevi based on dermoscopy. Exp Rev Dermatol. 2008;3:477–89.CrossRef
24.
Seidenari S, Pellacani G, Martella A, et al. Instrument-, age- and site-dependent variations of dermoscopic patterns of congenital melanocytic naevi: a multicentre study. Br J Dermatol. 2006;155:56–61.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Changchien L, Dusza SW, Agero AL, et al. Age- and site-specific variation in the dermoscopic patterns of congenital melanocytic nevi: an aid to accurate classification and assessment of melanocytic nevi. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143:1007–14.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Ferrara G, Argenziano G, Soyer HP, et al. The spectrum of Spitz nevi: a clinicopathologic study of 83 cases. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141:1381–7.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Ahlgrimm-Siess V, Massone C, Koller S, et al. In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of common naevi with globular, homogeneous and reticular pattern in dermoscopy. Br J Dermatol. 2008;158:1000–7.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Teban L, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M, Kittler H. Clinical value of a dermatoscopic classification of Clark nevi. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2003;1:292–6.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Kittler H, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M. Follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions with digital epiluminescence microscopy: patterns of modi fications observed in early melanoma, atypical nevi, and common nevi. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43:467–76.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Kittler H, Seltenheim M, Dawid M, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M. Frequency and characteristics of enlarging common melanocytic nevi. Arch Dermatol. 2000;136:316–20.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Nino M, Brunetti B, Delfino S, Brunetti B, Panariello L, Russo D. Spitz nevus: follow-up study of 8 cases of childhood starburst type and proposal for management. Dermatology. 2009;218:48–51.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Argenziano G, Zalaudek I, Ferrara G, Lorenzoni A, Soyer HP. Involution: the natural evolution of pigmented Spitz and Reed nevi? Arch Dermatol. 2007;143:549–51.PubMed
33.
Pizzichetta MA, Argenziano G, Grandi G, de Giacomi C, Trevisan G, Soyer HP. Morphologic changes of a pigmented Spitz nevus assessed by dermoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47:137–9.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Bowling J, Argenziano G, Azenha A, et al. Dermoscopy key points: recommendations from the international dermoscopy society. Dermatology. 2007;214:3–5.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Brunetti B, Nino M, Sammarco E, Scalvenzi M. Spitz naevus: a proposal for management. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2005;19:391–3.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, Soyer HP, et al. The Dermoscopy Working Group. Three-point checklist of dermoscopy: an open internet study. Br J Dermatol. 2006;154:431–7.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Henning JS, Dusza SW, Wang SQ, et al. The CASH (color, architecture, symmetry, and homogeneity) algorithm for dermoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;56:45–52.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Argenziano G, Fabbrocini G, Carli P, De Giorgi V, Sammarco E, Delfino M. Epiluminescence microscopy for the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions: comparison of the ABCD rule of dermatoscopy and a new 7-point checklist based on pattern analysis. Arch Dermatol. 1998;134:1563–70.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Schiffner R, Schiffner-Rohe J, Vogt T, Landthaler M, Wlotzke U, Cognetta AB, et al. Improvement of early recognition of lentigo maligna using dermatoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;42(1 Pt 1):25–32.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Saida T, Miyazaki A, Oguchi S, Ishihara Y, Yamazaki Y, Murase S, et al. Significance of dermoscopic patterns in detecting malignant melanoma on acral volar skin: results of a multicenter study in Japan. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(10):1233–8.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Malvehy J, Puig S. Dermoscopic patterns of benign volar melanocytic lesions in patients with atypical mole syndrome. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(5):538–44.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Gachon J, Beaulieu P, Sei JF, et al. First prospective study of the recognition process of melanoma in dermatological practice. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141:434–8.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Scope A, Dusza SW, Halpern AC, et al. The “ugly duckling” sign: agreement between observers. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144:58–64.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Scope A, Burroni M, Agero AL, et al. Predominant dermoscopic patterns observed among nevi. J Cutan Med Surg. 2006;10:170–4.PubMed
45.
Blum A, Soyer HP, Garbe C, Kerl H, Rassner G, Hofmann-Wellenhof R. The dermoscopic classification of atypical melanocytic naevi (Clark naevi) is useful to discriminate benign from malignant melanocytic lesions. Br J Dermatol. 2003;149:1159–64.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Salerni G, Lovatto L, Carrera C, Puig S, Malvehy J. Melanomas Detected in a Follow-up Program Com pared With Melanomas Referred to a Melanoma Unit. Arch Dermatol. 2011;147(5):549–55.PubMed
47.
Argenziano G, Kittler H, Ferrara G, Rubegni P, Malvehy J, Puig S, et al. Slow-growing melanoma: a dermoscopy follow-up study. Br J Dermatol. 2010;162:267–73.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Terushkin V, Dusza SW, Scope A, Argenziano G, Bahadoran P, Cowell L, et al. Changes observed in slow growing melanomas during long-term dermoscopic monitoring. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166:1213–20. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1365-2133.​2012.​10846.​x.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Menzies SW, Westerhoff K, Rabinovitz H, Kopf AW, McCarthy WH, Katz B. Surface microscopy of pigmented basal cell carcinoma. Arch Dermatol. 2000;136:1012–6.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Altamura D, Menzies SW, Argenziano G, et al. Dermatoscopy of basal cell carcinoma: morphologic variability of global and local features and accuracy of diagnosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62:67–75.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Peris K, Altobelli E, Ferrari A, et al. Interobserver agreement on dermoscopic features of pigmented basal cell carcinoma. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28:643–5.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Demirtasoglu M, Ilknur T, Lebe B, Kusku E, Akarsu S, Ozkan S. Evaluation of dermoscopic and histopathologic features and their correlations in pigmented basal cell carcinomas. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20:916–20.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Scalvenzi M, Lembo S, Francia MG, Balato A. Dermoscopic patterns of superficial basal cell carcinoma. Int J Dermatol. 2008;47:1015–8.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Giacomel J, Zalaudek I. Dermoscopy of superficial basal cell carcinoma. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31:1710–3.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Micantonio T, Gulia A, Altobelli E, et al. Vascular patterns in basal cell carcinoma. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011;25:358–61.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Zalaudek I, Ferrara G, Broganelli P, et al. Dermoscopy patterns of fibroepithelioma of pinkus. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142:1318–22.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Zamberk-Majlis P, Velazquez-Tarjuelo D, Aviles-Izquierdo JA, Lazaro-Ochaita P. Dermoscopic characterization of 3 cases of fibroepithelioma of Pinkus. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2009;100:899–902.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Zalaudek I, Giacomel J, Argenziano G, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Micantonio T, Di Stefani A, et al. Dermoscopy of facial nonpigmented actinic keratosis. Br J Dermatol. 2006;155(5):951–6.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Cuellar F, Vilalta A, Puig S, Palou J, Salerni G, Malvehy J. New dermoscopic pattern in actinic keratosis and related conditions. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145(6):732.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Zalaudek I, Ferrara G, Leinweber B, Mercogliano A, D’Ambrosio A, Argenziano G. Pitfalls in the clinical and dermoscopic diagnosis of pigmented actinic keratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53(6):1071–4.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Cameron A, Rosendahl C, Tschandl P, Riedl E, Kittler H. Dermatoscopy of pigmented Bowen’s disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62(4):597–604.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Segura S, Carrera C, Ferrando J, Mascaró Jr JM, Palou J, Malvehy J, et al. Dermoscopy in epidermodysplasia verruciformis. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32(1):103–6.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, Mordente I, et al. Nevus type in dermoscopy is related to skin type in white persons. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143:351–6.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Aguilera P, Puig S, Guilabert A, et al. Prevalence study of nevi in children from Barcelona: dermoscopy, constitutional and environmental factors. Dermatology. 2009;218:203–14.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Goulart JM, Malvehy J, Puig S, Martin G, Marghoob AA. Dermoscopy in skin self-examination: a useful tool for select patients. Arch Dermatol. 2011;147(1):53–8.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Argenziano G, Puig S, Zalaudek I, Sera F, Corona RM, Alsina M, et al. Dermoscopy improves accuracy of primary care physicians to triage suspicious skin tumours. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(12):1877–82.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Lallas A, Kyrgidis A, Tzellos TG, Apalla Z, Karakyriou E, Karatolias A, et al. Accuracy of dermoscopic criteria for the diagnosis of psoriasis, dermatitis, lichen planus and pityriasis rosea. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166:1198–205. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1365-2133.​2012.​10868.​x.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Segura S, Puig S, Carrera C, Lecha M, Borges V, Malvehy J. Non-invasive management of non-melanoma skin cancer in patients with cancer predisposition genodermatosis: a role for confocal microscopy and photodynamic therapy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011;25(7):819–27.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Scope A, Busam KJ, Malvehy J, Puig S, McClain SA, Braun RP, et al. Ex vivo dermoscopy of melanocytic tumors: time for dermatopathologists to learn dermoscopy. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(12):1548–52.PubMedCrossRef