Skip to main content
Top

14-07-2017 | Sarcoma | Article

Complete response of mediastinal clear cell sarcoma to pembrolizumab with radiotherapy

Journal: Clinical Sarcoma Research

Authors: Samuel Marcrom, Jennifer F. De Los Santos, Robert M. Conry

Publisher: BioMed Central

Abstract

Background

Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is a rare, aggressive soft tissue sarcoma thought to derive from neural crest and characterized by a 12;22 translocation. The resulting fusion protein directly activates expression of the melanocyte master transcription factor and drives the same down-stream pathways in CCS and melanoma leading to significant clinical parallels between these malignancies. Striking success of immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma has promoted interest in immunotherapy of CCS.

Case presentation

We report the first complete clinical response of a bulky chest wall recurrence of mediastinal CCS in a young woman to anti-PD1 checkpoint blockade with pembrolizumab combined with standard fractionation radiotherapy to enhance regional control and potentially boost the systemic immune response. The treatment was well tolerated with grade 2 skin toxicity within the range expected with radiation alone. Significant reduction in tumor bulk occurred after only 2 radiation fractions and complete response was achieved at 50 Gray.

Conclusion

The complete clinical response observed in our patient suggests synergy between concurrent radiotherapy and PD1 blockade in CCS. This case and the striking parallels between CCS and melanoma indicate the need for prospective trials of immune checkpoint blockade combined with radiotherapy in this rare malignancy.
Literature
1.
Jin L, Sui Y, Zhu H, et al. Primary mediastinal clear cell sarcoma: a case report and review of the literature. Diagn Pathol. 2017;12:5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Goldberg JM, Fisher DE, Demetri GD, et al. Biologic activity of autologous, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor secreting alveolar soft-part sarcoma and clear cell sarcoma vaccines. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:3178–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Negri T, Brich S, Conca E, et al. Receptor tyrosine kinase pathway analysis sheds light on similarities between clear-cell sarcoma and metastatic melanoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2012;51:111–26.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Segal NH, Pavlidis P, Noble WS, et al. Classification of clear-cell sarcoma as a subtype of melanoma by genomic profiling. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:1775–81.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Cornillie J, van Cann T, Wozniak A, et al. Biology and management of clear cell sarcoma: state of the art and future perspectives. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2016;16:839–45.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Kropp L, De Los Santos JF, Conry RM. Advanced melanoma treated with radiation therapy after limited progression following ipilimumab. Annual meeting of the American society for radiation oncology; 25–28 September 2016; Boston, MA. Poster presentation.
7.
Nitzan E, Pfaltzgraff ER, Labosky PA, et al. Neural crest and Schwann cell progenitor-derived melanocytes are two spatially segregated populations similarly regulated by Foxd3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:12709–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Handoko HY, Boyle GM, Ferguson B, et al. Plasticity of melanoma in vivo: murine lesions resulting from Trp53, but not Cdk4 or Arf deregulation, display neural transdifferentiation. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2013;26:731–4.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Mahalingam M. NF1 and neruofibromin: emerging players in the genetic landscape of demoplastic melanoma. Adv Anat Pathol. 2017;24:1–14.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Azumi N, Turner RR. Clear cell sarcoma of tendons and aponeuroses: electron microscopic findings suggesting Schwann cell differentiation. Hum Pathol. 1983;14:1084–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Schadendorf D, Hodi FS, Robert C, et al. Pooled analysis of long-term survival data from phase ii and phase iii trials of ipilimumab in unresectable or metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1889–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Robert C, Long GV, Brady B, et al. Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:320–30.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2521–32.CrossRefPubMed
14.
D’Angelo SP, Larkin J, Sosman JA, et al. Efficacy and safety of nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab in patients with mucosal melanoma: a pooled analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:226–35.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Tawbi HA, Burgess MA, Crowlet J, et al. Safety and efficacy of PD-1 blockade using pembrolizumab in patients with advanced soft tissues (STS) and bone sarcomas (BS): results of SARC028—a multicenter phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34 (suppl; abstr 11006).
16.
Jacobs IA, Chang CK, Guzman G, et al. Clear cell sarcoma: an institutional review. Am Surg. 2004;70:300–3.PubMed
17.
Ribeiro Gomes J, Schmerling RA, Haddad CK, et al. Analysis of the abscopal effect with anti-PD1 therapy in patients with metastatic solid tumors. J Immunother. 2016;39:367–72.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Weichselbaum RR, Liang H, Deng L, et al. Radiotherapy and immunotherapy: a beneficial liaison? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14(6):365–79.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Shabason JE, Minn AJ. Radiation and immune checkpoint blockade: from bench to clinic. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2017;27(3):289–98.CrossRefPubMed