Skip to main content
Top

03-08-2017 | Multiple myeloma | Article

Improved survival in Medicare patients with multiple myeloma: findings from a large nationwide and population-based cohort

Journal: Medical Oncology

Authors: Ying Chen, David R. Lairson, Wenyaw Chan, Xianglin L. Du

Publisher: Springer US

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine whether novel agents proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and immunomodulatory drugs lenalidomide and thalidomide are effective in prolonging overall survival (OS) for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) in the real-world practice setting. A nationwide and population-based retrospective cohort of elderly patients with advanced newly diagnosed MM from 2000 to 2009 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare linked data. Survival was compared between cases in 2005–2009 and in 2000–2004, and between patients treated with anti-MM therapy and the untreated among cases in 2005–2009, using Cox proportional hazards models, Kaplan–Meier methods, and propensity score adjustment to further control for baseline confounding. Of 8839 patients, 4028 (45.6%) cases were in 2000–2004 and 4811 (54.4%) in 2005–2009. OS was significantly longer for patients in 2005–2009 than patients in 2000–2004 (27.9 vs. 20.0 months, P < 0.001). The hazard ratio for OS for cases in 2005–2009 compared with those in 2000–2004 was 0.78 (95% CI 0.74–0.82). Among 4811 cases in 2005–2009, 54% (n = 2587) received anti-MM therapy. Compared to those untreated, OS was significantly longer (41.1 vs. 27.9 months, P < 0.001) and hazard ratio was 0.58 (95% CI 0.54–0.62) in the treated patients. This study demonstrated improved survival in newly diagnosed MM patients in a more recent 5-year cohort compared with those in the previous 5 years. The survival benefit was significant across different demographic and patient characteristics. However, there were still a substantial number of MM patients not receiving anti-MM therapy.
Literature
1.
Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2012, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. http://​seer.​cancer.​gov/​csr/​1975_​2012/​ Based on November 2014 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2015.
3.
National Cancer Institute (NCI). http://​www.​cancer.​gov/​researchandfundi​ng/​snapshots/​myeloma. Accessed September 2016.
4.
Sergentanis TN, Zagouri F, et al. Risk factors for multiple myeloma: a systematic review of meta-analyses. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2015;15(10):563–77 (e1-3).CrossRefPubMed
5.
Eriksson M, Karlsson M. Occupational and other environmental factors and multiple myeloma: a population based case–control study. Br J Ind Med. 1992;49(2):95–103.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Barlogie B, Shaughnessy J, et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma. Blood. 2004;103(1):20–32.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Brenner H, Gondos A, Pulte D. Recent major improvement in long-term survival of younger patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2008;111:2521–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, et al. Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood. 2008;111:2516–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Palumbo A, Anderson K. Mulitple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1046–60.CrossRefPubMed
10.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) Version 1.2012, National Comprehensive Cancer Network.
11.
Mikhael JR, Dingli D, Roy V, et al. Management of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma: updated Mayo stratification of myeloma and risk-adapted therapy (mSMART) consensus guidelines 2013. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88(4):360–76.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Moreau J, San Miguel J, Ludwig H, et al. Multiple myeloma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(Suppl 6):vi133–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Warren JL, Harlan LC, Stevens J, Little RF, Abel GA. Multiple myeloma treatment transformed: a population-based study of changes in initial management approaches in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(16):1984–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
National Cancer Institute. Brochure for the SEER program. http://​seer.​cancer.​gov/​about/​factsheets/​SEER_​brochure.​pdf. Accessed September 2016.
15.
Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, et al. Use of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-Medicare data to conduct case–control studies of cancer among the US elderly. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174(7):860–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Potosky AL, Riley GF, Lubitz JD, et al. Potential for cancer related health services research using a linked Medicare tumor registry database. Med Care. 1993;31:732–48.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Schrag D, et al. Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Med Care. 2002;40(suppl 8):3–8.
18.
Du XL, Goodwin JS. Patterns of use of chemotherapy for breast cancer in older women: findings from Medicare claims data. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1455–61.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Du XL, Key CR, Dickie L, et al. External validation of Medicare claims for breast cancer chemotherapy compared with medical chart reviews. Med Care. 2006;44:124–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
National Cancer Institute. The SEER Program Code Manual, revised ed [NIH Publication No. 94-1999]. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 1994.
21.
U.S. Public Health Services. International classification of disease, 9th Revision, clinical modification, 5th ed. Los Angeles: Practice Management Information Corporation; 1996.
22.
American Medical Association. Physicians’ current procedural terminology: CPT 2000. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2000.
23.
Health Care Financing Administration. HCFA common procedure coding system (HCPCS): National level II Medicare codes. Los Angeles: Practice Management Information Corporation; 2000.
24.
Mandelblatt JS, Kerner JF, Hadley J, et al. Variations in breast carcinoma treatment in older Medicare beneficiaries: is it black or white? Cancer. 2002;95:1401–14.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Du XL, Chan W, Giordano S, et al. Variation in modes of chemotherapy administration for breast carcinoma and association with hospitalization for chemotherapy-related toxicity. Cancer. 2005;104:913–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Kleinbaum DG. Survival analysis: a self-learning text. New York: Springer; 1996.CrossRef
27.
Rubin DB, Thomas N. Matching using estimated propensity scores: relating theory to practice. Biometrics. 1996;52:249–64.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Cochran WG. The effectiveness of adjustment by subclassification in removing bias in observational studies. Biometrics. 1968;24:296–313.CrossRef
29.
Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J Am Stat Assoc. 1984;79:516–24.CrossRef
30.
Wijermans P, Schaafsma M, Termorshuizen F, Ammerlaan R, Wittebol S, Sinnige H, et al. Phase III study of the value of thalidomide added to melphalan plus prednisone in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the HOVON 49 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(19):3160–6.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Hulin C, Facon T, Rodon P, Pegourie B, Benboubker L, Doyen C, et al. Efficacy of melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide in patients older than 75 years with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: IFM 01/01 Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(22):3664–70. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2008.​21.​0948.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Facon T, Mary JY, Hulin C, Benboubker L, Attal M, Pegourie B, et al. Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide versus melphalan and prednisone alone or reduced-intensity autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma (IFM 99-06): a randomized trial. Lancet. 2007;370(9594):1209–18.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Caravita T, Merla E, Capparella V, Callea V, et al. Oral melphalan and prednisone chemotherapy plus thalidomide compared with melphalan and prednisone alone in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;367(9513):825–31.CrossRefPubMed
34.
San Miguel JF, Schlag R, Khuageva NK, Dimopoulos MA, Shpilberg O, Kropff M, et al. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(9):906–17.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Rohatgi N, Du XL, Coker AL, Moye LA, Wang M, Fang S. Chemotherapy and survival for patients with multiple myeloma: findings from a large nationwide and population-based cohort. Am J Clin Oncol. 2007;30(5):540–8.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Begg CB, Cohen JL, Ellerton J. Are the elderly predisposed to toxicity from cancer chemotherapy? An investigation using data from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Cancer Clin Trials. 1980;3:369–74.PubMed
37.
Christman K, Muss HB, Case LD, et al. Chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer in the elderly: the Piedmont Oncology Association experience. JAMA. 1992;268:57–62.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Du XL, Osborne C, Goodwin JS. Population-based assessment of hospitalizations for toxicity from chemotherapy in older women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:4636–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Du XL, Lairson DR, Begley CE, et al. Temporal and geographic variation in the use of hematopoietic growth factors in older women receiving breast cancer chemotherapy: findings from a large population-based cohort. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8620–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Jawed I, Lee CM, Tward JD, Macdonald OK, Martincic D, Vudarla N, Fairbanks RK, Kaya H. Survival outcomes for multiple myeloma over three decades: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(18W)((June 20 Supplement)):8019.
41.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). National drug code directory. https://​www.​accessdata.​fda.​gov/​scripts/​cder/​ndc/​. Accessed August 2016.
42.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS.gov). 2015 table of drugs. https://​www.​cms.​gov/​Medicare/​Coding/​HCPCSReleaseCode​Sets/​Downloads/​2015-Table-of-Drugs-.​pdf. Accessed August 2016.