In this chapter, Collettini and Hamm review the use of different imaging techniques in the management of cervical cancer. Collettini F., Hamm B. In: . Medical Radiology . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 2017. doi: 10.1007/174_2017_54

This article reviews a decade of data on human papilloma virus vaccine safety, efficacy, disparities, and interventions to improve vaccination rates, focusing on the most recent year of published data. Beavis AL et al. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep . 2017; 6: 219. doi:10.1007/s13669-017-0216-0

Pap screening and human papillomavirus vaccination are effective preventative measures for cervical cancer. However, access to care remains an important barrier and May and Ware suggest immunization in the emergency department as a potential solution. May L & Ware C. In: Oncologic Emergency Medicine. Edited by Todd KH & Thomas Jr CR. Springer International Publishing, 2016. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26387-8_9

This article reviews the exciting promise and current pitfalls of using recently developed advanced MRI techniques for the non-invasive assessment of cervical cancer. Dappa E et al. Insights Imaging 2017; 8: 471-481. doi:10.1007/s13244-017-0567-0

In this chapter, Halaska and Rob discuss pregnancy-preserving management approaches in patients with cervical cancer. Halaska MJ & Rob L. In:  Managing Cancer during Pregnancy . Edited by Azim Jr HA. Springer International Publishing, 2016. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28800-0_12

In this article, the authors discuss indications for fertility-sparing methods available to women with gynecological cancer, and up-to-date data on safety and efficacy as regards oncologic outcomes and reproductive outcomes. Feichtinger M & Rodriguez-Wallberg KA. Gynaecol Oncol Res Pract 2016;3:8. doi:10.1186/s40661-016-0029-2

This chapter illustrates clinical case examples that demonstrate the clinical utility and diagnostic performance of fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT scans in gynecologic neoplasms. Desai B & Jadvar H. In: PET-CT. Edited by Conti PS & Kaushik A. Springer New York, 2016. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-5811-2_7

This chapter provides an overview of the role of radical hysterectomy in the management of cervical cancer. Cibula D. In: Pelvic Cancer Surgery . Edited by Patel HRH, Mould T, Joseph JV, Delaney CP. Springer London, 2015. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-4258-4_33

This chapter analyzes the impact of gynecologic cancer on women’s sexuality and discusses how to improve psychosexual and quality of life outcomes in the context of standardized treatments versus minimally invasive oncologic surgery. Graziottin A & Lukasiewicz M. In:  Functional Urologic Surgery in Neurogenic and Oncologic Diseases . Edited by Carbone A, Palleschi G, Pastore AL, Messas A. Springer International Publishing, 2016. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-29191-8_9

Woo et al review the literature published since 2012 to review the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting parametrial invasion in patients with cervical cancer. Woo S et al. Eur Radiol . 2017. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4958-x

Urological complications are common after radical hysterectomy for the treatment of cervical cancer, and this review article provides an overview on how to optimally manage these cases. Nat Rev Urol  2014; 11: 110–117. doi:10.1038/nrurol.2013.323

Fields and Weiss review the benefit of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for radiotherapy of cervical cancer and provide recommendations for the use of MRI that are applicable to daily practice. Fields EC & Weiss E. Radiat Oncol 2016; 11: 15. doi:10.1186/s13014-016-0591-0