Skip to main content
Latest news
Browse specialties
Breast cancer Genitourinary cancers Lung & thoracic cancers
In focus
Next-generation sequencing: Emerging biomarkers in thyroid and NSCLCs ctDNA and bladder cancer: Current understanding and beyond ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC NSCLC driver mutations: Discussing the importance of RET, ALK and ROS1 alterations in NSCLC Early-stage NSCLC management: Surgery, targeted treatment and immunotherapy ALK fusion-positive NSCLC: International approaches to management RET fusion-positive NSCLC: Informing on the use of pralsetinib for patients with RET fusion-positive, advanced NSCLC COVID-19 & cancer
Conferences
SABCS 2022 ESMO 2022 2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
About us
Medicine Matters Oncology
EXTENDED SEARCH
Top

18-04-2017 | Sarcoma | Article

Uterine Adenosarcoma: a Review

Journal: Current Oncology Reports

Authors: Michael J. Nathenson, Vinod Ravi, Nicole Fleming, Wei-Lien Wang, Anthony Conley

Publisher: Springer US

Login to get access

Abstract

Adenosarcomas are rare malignancies of the female genital tract, accounting for approximately 5 % of uterine sarcomas. Occasionally, adenosarcoma occurs in the ovaries or in extra-uterine tissue, which may be related to endometriosis. These tumors are characterized by benign epithelial elements and a malignant mesenchymal component. Pathologic diagnosis is dependent on the identification of the characteristic morphologic features. The most common immunohistochemical markers for adenosarcoma are CD10 and WT1, but these are not specific. The most frequent presenting symptom is abnormal uterine bleeding. The majority of patients present with stage I disease, with a 5-year overall survival of 60 to 80 %. Survival is influenced by the presence of myometrial invasion, sarcomatous overgrowth, lymphovascular invasion, necrosis, and the presence of heterologous elements including rhabdomyoblastic differentiation. Patients with sarcomatous overgrowth have significantly increased risk of recurrence 23 versus 77 % and decreased 5-year overall survival 50 to 60 %. Standard of care treatment is total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy without lymphadenectomy, as the incidence of lymph node metastasis is rare. Retrospective data does not support the use of adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy in uterine adenosarcomas as no survival benefit is seen. Insufficient data exists to recommend routinely neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy for uterine adenosarcomas. Limited evidence exists for the role of hormonal therapy in uterine adenosarcomas. The PIK3/AKT/PTEN pathway is mutated in ∼70 % of adenosarcomas, and this may represent a possible therapeutic target. This article reviews the current state of knowledge concerning uterine adenosarcoma and discusses the management of this rare tumor.
Literature
1.
Major FJ, Blessing JA, Silverberg SG, Morrow CP, Creasman WT, Currie JL, et al. Prognostic factors in early-stage uterine sarcoma. Gynecol Oncol Group Study Cancer. 1993;71(4 Suppl):1702–9.
2.
D’Angelo E, Prat J. Uterine sarcomas: a review. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116(1):131–9.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Brooks SE, Zhan M, Cote T, Baquet CR. Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis of 2677 cases of uterine sarcoma 1989–1999. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;93(1):204–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Abeler VM, Royne O, Thoresen S, Danielsen HE, Nesland JM, Kristensen GB. Uterine sarcomas in Norway. A histopathological and prognostic survey of a total population from 1970 to 2000 including 419 patients. Histopathology. 2009;54(3):355–64.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Clement PB, Scully RE. Mullerian adenosarcoma of the uterus: a clinicopathologic analysis of 100 cases with a review of the literature. Hum Pathol. 1990;21(4):363–81.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Shi Y, Liu Z, Peng Z, Liu H, Yang K, Yao X. The diagnosis and treatment of Mullerian adenosarcoma of the uterus. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;48(6):596–600.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Benito V, Lubrano A, Arencibia O, Andujar M, Alvarez E, Medina N, et al. Clinicopathologic analysis of uterine sarcomas from a single institution in the Canary Islands. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;107(1):44–9.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Clement PB, Scully RE. Mullerian adenosarcoma of the uterus. A clinicopathologic analysis of ten cases of a distinctive type of Mullerian mixed tumor. Cancer. 1974;34(4):1138–49.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Kaku T, Silverberg SG, Major FJ, Miller A, Fetter B, Brady MF. Adenosarcoma of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group clinicopathologic study of 31 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1992;11(2):75–88.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Blom R, Guerrieri C. Adenosarcoma of the uterus: a clinicopathologic, DNA flow cytometric, p53 and mdm-2 analysis of 11 cases. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1999;9(1):37–43.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Chin PS, Chia YN, Lim YK, Yam KL. Diagnosis and management of Mullerian adenosarcoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;121(3):229–32.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Tanner EJ, Toussaint T, Leitao Jr MM, Hensley ML, Soslow RA, Gardner GJ, et al. Management of uterine adenosarcomas with and without sarcomatous overgrowth. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;129(1):140–4.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Krivak TC, Seidman JD, McBroom JW, MacKoul PJ, Aye LM, Rose GS. Uterine adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth versus uterine carcinosarcoma: comparison of treatment and survival. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;83(1):89–94.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Clement PB, Scully RE. Extrauterine mesodermal (Mullerian) adenosarcoma: a clinicopathologic analysis of five cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 1978;69(3):276–83.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Clement PB. Mullerian adenosarcomas of the uterus with sarcomatous overgrowth. A clinicopathological analysis of 10 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1989;13(1):28–38.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Clement PB, Scully RE. Mullerian adenosarcomas of the uterus with sex cord-like elements. A clinicopathologic analysis of eight cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 1989;91(6):664–72.PubMedCrossRef
17.
•• Carroll A, Ramirez PT, Westin SN, Soliman PT, Munsell MF, Nick AM, et al. Uterine adenosarcoma: an analysis on management, outcomes, and risk factors for recurrence. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;135(3):455–61. Largest single institution series of uterine adenosarcoma patients which showed that the presence of sarcomatous overgrowth was associated with a higer risk of recurrence.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
Bernard B, Clarke BA, Malowany JI, McAlpine J, Lee CH, Atenafu EG, et al. Uterine adenosarcomas: a dual-institution update on staging, prognosis and survival. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;131(3):634–9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Gallardo A, Prat J. Mullerian adenosarcoma: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 55 cases challenging the existence of adenofibroma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(2):278–88.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Verschraegen CF, Vasuratna A, Edwards C, Freedman R, Kudelka AP, Tornos C, et al. Clinicopathologic analysis of Mullerian adenosarcoma: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Oncol Rep. 1998;5(4):939–44.PubMed
21.
Arend R, Bagaria M, Lewin SN, Sun X, Deutsch I, Burke WM, et al. Long-term outcome and natural history of uterine adenosarcomas. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;119(2):305–8.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Carleton C, Houghton OP, McCluggage WG. Juvenile granulosa cell tumor arising in ovarian adenosarcoma: an unusual form of sarcomatous overgrowth. Hum Pathol. 2015;46(4):614–9.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Czernobilsky B, Gillespie JJ, Roth LM. Adenosarcoma of the ovary. A light- and electron-microscopic study with review of the literature. Diagn Gynecol Obstet. 1982;4(1):25–36.PubMed
24.
Garalejic E, Arsic B, Perovic M, Vasiljevic M, Usaj SK, Stanojevic D. Adenosarcoma ovarii in a 51-year-old woman: case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2012;33(5):543–5.PubMed
25.
Hirakawa E, Yamamoto Y, Fujimoto C, Kobayashi S, Haba R, Ishikawa M, et al. Aggressive adenosarcoma of the ovary. Histopathology. 2003;42(2):202–3.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Litta P, Pozzan C, Sacco G, Merlin F, Saccardi C, Ambrosini A. Adenosarcoma of the ovary. A case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2004;25(4):507–8.PubMed
27.
Manipadam MT, Munemane A, Emmanuel P, McCluggage WG. Ovarian adenosarcoma with extensive deciduoid morphology arising in endometriosis: a case report. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2008;27(3):398–401.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Mikami M, Tanaka K, Onouchi M, Komiyama S, Ishikawa M, Hirose T. A case of ovarian adenosarcoma with a heterologous rhabdomyosarcoma component: a brief case report. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;117(1):112–4.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Shah A, Rekhi B, Maheshwari A, Jambhekar NA. Low-grade Mullerian adenosarcoma with prominent decidualization, involving bilateral ovaries against a background of endometriosis: a diagnostic and treatment challenge. J Postgrad Med. 2013;59(2):149–52.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Shetty M, Lal N, Vu NH. Mullerian adenosarcoma of the ovary: case report and review of the literature. Ultrasound Q. 2007;23(3):189–91.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Kao GF, Norris HJ. Benign and low grade variants of mixed mesodermal tumor (adenosarcoma) of the ovary and adnexal region. Cancer. 1978;42(3):1314–24.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Fukunaga M, Nomura K, Endo Y, Ushigome S, Aizawa S. Ovarian adenosarcoma. Histopathology. 1997;30(3):283–7.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Chen ZW, Saad RS. Ovarian adenosarcoma arising from benign cystadenoma and associated intraoperative consultation pitfalls. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2010;29(5):415–8.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Chen YL, Hsiao SM, Lin MC, Lin HH. Bone metastasis as the initial presentation in one case of ovarian cancer with two components of endometrioid adenocarcinoma and adenosarcoma. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;48(3):298–301.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Giarenis I, Peat D, Nieto JJ. Combined malignant ovarian tumour consisting of angiosarcoma, adenosarcoma, cystadenofibroma and granulosa cell tumour. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;28(1):121–3.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Hirakawa E, Kobayashi S, Miki H, Haba R, Saoo K, Yamakawa K, et al. Ascitic fluid cytology of adenosarcoma of the ovary: a case report. Diagn Cytopathol. 2001;24(5):343–6.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Lee TY, Lee C, Choi WJ, Lee JY, Kim HY. Synchronous occurrence of primary malignant mixed mullerian tumor in ovary and uterus. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2013;56(4):269–72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
Patel T, Gupta A, Trivedi P, Shah M. Osteoid differentiation in mesodermal (mullerian) adenosarcoma of ovary. J Cancer Res Ther. 2013;9(3):529–31.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Petrovichev NN. Mesodermal (Muller) mixed ovarian tumor. Arkh Patol. 1983;45(7):76–9.PubMed
40.
Recinos-Money E, Escobar-Alfaro G, Contreras J, Zepeda-Castilla E, Parra-Torres C, Di Castro P. Ovarian adenosarcoma with elevated CA125 antigen. Case report and literature review. Cir Cir. 2008;76(1):71–5.PubMed
41.
Shakuntala P, Umadevi K, Usha A, Abhilasha N, Bafna U. Primary ovarian adenosarcoma with elevated Ca-125 levels and normal ascitic fluid cytology: a case report and review of literature. Ecancermedicalscience. 2012;6:284.PubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Shintaku M, Mise Y. Mullerian adenosarcoma with a neuroectodermal component associated with an endometriotic cyst of the ovary: a case report. Pathol Int. 2012;62(4):271–5.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Takeuchi K, Kitazawa S, Deguchi M, Maruo T. Adenofibromasarcoma originating from a mural nodule of ovarian serous cystadenoma. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2005;26(5):511–3.PubMed
44.
Touraud JP, Lentz N, Dutronc Y, Mercier E, Sagot P, Lambert D. Umbilical cutaneous metastasis (or Sister Mary Joseph’s nodule) disclosing an ovarian adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2000;28(10):719–21.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Yasuoka H, Tsujimoto M, Fujita S, Yamasaki T, Kashihara H, Nishio Y, et al. Coexistence of a clear cell adenocarcinoma and an adenosarcoma with a heterologous rhabdomyosarcoma in an endometriotic cyst of the ovary: a case study. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2009;28(4):362–6.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Valdez VA, Planas AT, Lopez VF, Goldberg M, Herrera NE. Adenosarcoma of uterus and ovary: a clinicopathologic study of two cases. Cancer. 1979;43(4):1439–47.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Eichhorn JH, Young RH, Clement PB, Scully RE. Mesodermal (mullerian) adenosarcoma of the ovary: a clinicopathologic analysis of 40 cases and a review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26(10):1243–58.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Gal D, Kerner H, Beck D, Peretz BA, Eyal A, Paldi E. Mullerian adenosarcoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 1988;31(3):445–53.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Kerner H, Lichtig C. Mullerian adenosarcoma presenting as cervical polyps: a report of seven cases and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81(5 (Pt 1)):655–9.PubMed
50.
Patrelli TS, Gizzo S, Di Gangi S, Guidi G, Rondinelli M, Nardelli GB. Cervical Mullerian adenosarcoma with heterologous sarcomatous overgrowth: a fourth case and review of literature. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:236.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
51.
Jones MW, Lefkowitz M. Adenosarcoma of the uterine cervix: a clinicopathological study of 12 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1995;14(3):223–9.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Manoharan M, Azmi MA, Soosay G, Mould T, Weekes AR. Mullerian adenosarcoma of uterine cervix: report of three cases and review of literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;105(1):256–60.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Seagle BL, Falter 2nd KJ, Lee SJ, Frimer M, Samuelson R, Shahabi S. Mullerian adenosarcoma of the cervix: report of two large tumors with sarcomatous overgrowth or heterologous elements. Gynecol Oncol Case Rep. 2014;9:7–10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
54.
Ali M, Fayemi AO. Mullerian adenosarcoma of uterine cervix. Report of a case with rapidly fatal outcome. Diagn Gynecol Obstet. 1980;2(2):135–8.PubMed
55.
Bagga R, Keepanasseril A, Srinivasan R, Dey P, Gainder S, Saha SC, et al. Adenosarcoma of the uterine cervix with heterologous elements: a case report and review of literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;281(4):669–75.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Bhandare D, Madiwale C, Kothari K, Pandit A, Kane S. Mullerian adenosarcoma of the uterine cervix. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2001;44(3):371–2.PubMed
57.
Charfi S, Kallel R, Mnif H, Ellouze S, Dhouib M, Guermazi M, et al. Mullerian adenosaroma of the cervix with sarcomatous overgrowth and heterologous elements presenting as a recurrent cervical polyp. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2012;2012:358302.PubMedPubMedCentral
58.
Comunoglu N, Comunoglu C, Bassullu N, Somunkiran A, Calay Z. Mullerian adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth of the cervix: unusual large polypoid mass. Ups J Med Sci. 2007;112(1):67–72.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Duggal R, Nijhawan R, Aggarwal N, Sikka P. Mullerian adenosarcoma (heterologous) of the cervix with sarcomatous overgrowth: a case report with review of literature. J Gynecol Oncol. 2010;21(2):125–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
60.
Edinger Jr DD, Safaii H, Tak W, Anderson B, Watring WG. Cervical mullerian adenosarcoma: case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1982;3(2):69–73.PubMed
61.
Fayemi AO, Ali M, Braun EV. Mullerian adenosarcoma of the uterine cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;130(6):734–5.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Feroze M, Aravindan KP, Thomas M. Mullerian adenosarcoma of the uterine cervix. Indian J Cancer. 1997;34(2):68–72.PubMed
63.
Fleming NA, Hopkins L, de Nanassy J, Senterman M, Black AY. Mullerian adenosarcoma of the cervix in a 10-year-old girl: case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2009;22(4):e45–51.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Garcia R, Troyas RG, Bercero EA. Mullerian adenosarcoma of the cervix: differential diagnosis, histogenesis and review of the literature. Pathol Int. 1995;45(11):890–4.CrossRef
65.
Gast MJ, Radkins LV, Jacobs AJ, Gersell D. Mullerian adenosarcoma of the cervix with heterologous elements: diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Gynecol Oncol. 1989;32(3):381–4.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Hino A, Hirose T, Seki K, Uehara H, Sano N. Adenosarcoma of the uterine cervix presenting as a cervical polyp. Pathol Int. 1998;48(8):649–52.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Koshiyama M, Ueta M, Okamoto T, Yamamoto K. Mullerian adenosarcoma arising from the uterine cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83(3):315–6.PubMed
68.
Limaiem F, Bouraoui S, Azouz H, Lahmar A, Ben Fadhel C, Zouari F, et al. Adenosarcoma of the cervix with heterologous elements masquerading as a benign polyp: case report. Tunis Med. 2008;86(7):725–6.PubMed
69.
Niculescu M, Simionescu C, Novac L, Mogoanta L, Mindrila I. Adenosarcoma of the uterine cervix: positive and differential diagnosis. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2007;48(1):79–82.PubMed
70.
Park HM, Park MH, Kim YJ, Chun SH, Ahn JJ, Kim CI, et al. Mullerian adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth of the cervix presenting as cervical polyp: a case report and review of the literature. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004;14(5):1024–9.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Ramos P, Ruiz A, Carabias E, Pinero I, Garzon A, Alvarez I. Mullerian adenosarcoma of the cervix with heterologous elements: report of a case and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;84(1):161–6.PubMedCrossRef
72.
Rossi G, Cavazza A, Longo L, Maiorana A. Localized pleural metastatic adenosarcoma of the uterine cervix mimicking a malignant solitary fibrous tumour: CD10 has no value in differential diagnosis. Histopathology. 2002;41(1):82–3.PubMedCrossRef
73.
Roth LM, Pride GL, Sharma HM. Mullerian adenosarcoma of the uterine cervix with heterologous elements: a light and electron microscopic study. Cancer. 1976;37(4):1725–36.PubMedCrossRef
74.
Tang CK, Toker C, Harriman B. Mullerian adenosarcoma of the uterine cervix. Hum Pathol. 1981;12(6):579–81.PubMedCrossRef
75.
Tomaszewski A, Michels JJ. Rare case of a cervix of uterus adenosarcome reported on a primipara 29 years old woman. Ann Pathol. 2013;33(3):222–4.PubMedCrossRef
76.
Anderson J, Behbakht K, De Geest K, Bitterman P. Adenosarcoma in a patient with vaginal endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(5 Pt 2):964–6.PubMed
77.
Wang Y, Huang YW, Li YF. Primary vaginal sarcoma: experience of a regional cancer center in China. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(9):1463–8.PubMedCrossRef
78.
Han X, Leng J, Guo L, Xiang Y, Lang J. Vaginal adenosarcoma arising from refractory endometriosis: a case report. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;50(6):574–6.PubMedCrossRef
79.
Judson PL, Temple AM, Fowler Jr WC, Novotny DB, Funkhouser Jr WK. Vaginal adenosarcoma arising from endometriosis. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;76(1):123–5.PubMedCrossRef
80.
Toyoshima M, Akahira J, Moriya T, Hayakawa S, Yaegashi N. Primary vaginal adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;95(3):759–61.PubMedCrossRef
81.
Lyle P, Evans R, Jarboe E, Fong D, Behbakht K, Davidson S, et al. Biphasic tumors of the female genital tract. Oncology (Williston Park). 2005;19(9):1178. 83, 88, 90, 95–6 passim.
82.
de Jonge MJ, van Dam PA, Van Marck E, Prove A, van Oosterom AT. Primary extrauterine mullerian adenosarcoma of the peritoneum. Gynecol Oncol. 1995;57(1):126–30.PubMedCrossRef
83.
Dincer AD, Timmins P, Pietrocola D, Fisher H, Ambros RA. Primary peritoneal mullerian adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth associated with endometriosis: a case report. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2002;21(1):65–8.PubMedCrossRef
84.
Kanngurn S, Somran J, Art-Ong C, Lamlertthon W, Porncharoenpong S. Primary peritoneal adenosarcoma with stromal overgrowth and fetal type cartilage: a case report and literature review. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005;88(6):849–54.PubMed
85.
Kar R, Verma SK, Papa D, Sylvia MT. Extrauterine adenosarcoma arising in omental endometriosis: rare site of occurrence of a rare tumor. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2014;57(4):640–1.PubMedCrossRef
86.
Karateke A, Kahramanoglu I, Bilgic R. Extragenital mullerian adenosarcoma in the pouch of douglas. Balkan Med J. 2014;31(1):100–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
87.
Kato N, Zhe J, Endoh Y, Motoyama T. Extrauterine Mullerian adenosarcoma of the peritoneum with an extensive rhabdomyosarcomatous element and a marked myxoid change. Pathol Int. 2000;50(4):347–51.PubMedCrossRef
88.
Kerner H, Lichtig C, Beck D. Extrauterine mullerian adenosarcoma of the peritoneal mesothelium: a clinicopathologic and electron microscopic study. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;73(3 Pt 2):510–3.PubMed
89.
Murugasu A, Miller J, Proietto A, Millar E. Extragenital mullerian adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth arising in an endometriotic cyst in the pouch of Douglas. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003;13(3):371–5.PubMedCrossRef
90.
Ostor AG, Nirenberg A, Ashdown ML, Murphy DJ. Extragenital adenosarcoma arising in the pouch of Douglas. Gynecol Oncol. 1994;53(3):373–5.PubMedCrossRef
91.
Patrelli TS, Silini EM, Gizzo S, Berretta R, Franchi L, Thai E, et al. Extragenital Mullerian adenosarcoma with pouch of Douglas location. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:171.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
92.
Raffaelli R, Piazzola E, Zanconato G, Fedele L. A rare case of extrauterine adenosarcoma arising in endometriosis of the rectovaginal septum. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(4):1142–4.PubMedCrossRef
93.
Thylan S. Primary extrauterine mullerian adenosarcoma of the peritoneum. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;60(2):333.PubMed
94.
Toral JA. Extraendometrial mullerian adenosarcoma. Philipp J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;22(3):87–97.PubMed
95.
Visvalingam S, Jaworski R, Blumenthal N, Chan F. Primary peritoneal mesodermal adenosarcoma: report of a case and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;81(3):500–5.PubMedCrossRef
96.
Yang C, Oh HK, Kim D. Mullerian adenosarcoma arising from rectal endometriosis. Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(5):232–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
97.
Russell P, Slavutin L, Laverty CR, Cooper-Booth J. Extrauterine mesodermal (mullerian) adenosarcoma. A case report. Pathology. 1979;11(3):557–60.PubMedCrossRef
98.
Lazar RI, Straja T, Bratucu B. Uterine adenosarcoma metastasizing to the retroperitoneum. The impact of vascular involvement. J Med Life. 2012;5(2):145–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
99.
Marco V, Forcada P. Mesonephric adenosarcoma of the renal pelvis with heterologous elements. Am J Surg Pathol. 1985;9(8):610–4.PubMedCrossRef
100.
Michal M, Hes O, Bisceglia M, Simpson RH, Spagnolo DV, Parma A, et al. Mixed epithelial and stromal tumors of the kidney. A report of 22 cases. Virchows Arch. 2004;445(4):359–67.PubMedCrossRef
101.
Picken MM, Curry JL, Lindgren V, Clark JI, Eble JN. Metanephric adenosarcoma in a young adult: morphologic, immunophenotypic, ultrastructural, and fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25(11):1451–7.PubMedCrossRef
102.
Sameshima N, Marutsuka K, Tsukino H, Kamoto T, Kono S, Asada Y. So-called ‘adenosarcoma’ of the kidney a novel adult renal tumor with a cystic appearance. Pathol Int. 2011;61(5):313–8.PubMedCrossRef
103.
Su T, Yan F, Zhu P. Metanephric adenosarcoma: a rare case with immunohistochemistry and molecular analysis. Diagn Pathol. 2014;9:179.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
104.
Vara AR, Ruzics EP, Moussabeck O, Martin DC. Endometrioid adenosarcoma of the bladder arising from endometriosis. J Urol. 1990;143(4):813–5.PubMed
105.
Volkov VP, Lazdin OA, Sadikov ID. Adenosarcoma of the liver in patient with liver cirrhosis. Klin Med (Mosk). 1979;57(3):105–7.
106.
N’Senda P, Wendum D, Balladur P, Dahan H, Tubiana JM, Arrive L. Adenosarcoma arising in hepatic endometriosis. Eur Radiol. 2000;10(8):1287–9.PubMedCrossRef
107.
Jelovsek JE, Winans C, Brainard J, Falcone T. Endometriosis of the liver containing mullerian adenosarcoma: case report. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(5):1725–7.PubMedCrossRef
108.
Yang F, Yang KX, Yao XY, Gong J, Song B. Adenosarcoma arising in abdominal scar endometriosis: report of a case. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2008;37(9):643–4.PubMed
109.
Milam MR, Atkinson JB, Currie JL. Adenosarcoma arising in inguinal endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(3 Pt 2):753–5.PubMedCrossRef
110.
Kondi-Pafiti A, Spanidou-Carvouni H, Papadias K, Hatzistamou-Kiari I, Kontogianni K, Liapis A, et al. Malignant neoplasms arising in endometriosis: clinicopathological study of 14 cases. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2004;31(4):302–4.PubMed
111.
Stern RC, Dash R, Bentley RC, Snyder MJ, Haney AF, Robboy SJ. Malignancy in endometriosis: frequency and comparison of ovarian and extraovarian types. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2001;20(2):133–9.PubMedCrossRef
112.
Higashiura Y, Kajihara H, Shigetomi H, Kobayashi H. Identification of multiple pathways involved in the malignant transformation of endometriosis (review). Oncol Lett. 2012;4(1):3–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
113.
Akhavan A, Akhavan Tafti M, Aghili F, Navabii H. Uterine adenosarcoma in a patient with history of breast cancer and long-term tamoxifen consumption. BMJ Case Rep. 2012;2012.
114.
Arenas M, Rovirosa A, Hernandez V, Ordi J, Jorcano S, Mellado B, et al. Uterine sarcomas in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16(2):861–5.PubMedCrossRef
115.
Arici DS, Aker H, Yildiz E, Tasyurt A. Mullerian adenosarcoma of the uterus associated with tamoxifen therapy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2000;264(2):105–7.PubMedCrossRef
116.
Farhat F, Fakhruddine N. A case of synchronous relapse of breast cancer and uterine mullerian adenosarcoma post tamoxifen in a premenopausal woman. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2008;29(1):95–7.PubMed
117.
Jagavkar RS, Shakespeare TP, Stevens MJ. Endometrial adenosarcoma with adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for primary breast carcinoma. Australas Radiol. 1998;42(2):157–8.PubMedCrossRef
118.
Jessop FA, Roberts PF. Mullerian adenosarcoma of the uterus in association with tamoxifen therapy. Histopathology. 2000;36(1):91–2.PubMedCrossRef
119.
Le Bouedec G, Penault-Llorca F, de Latour M, Tortochaux J, Dauplat J. Mixed mullerian tumours of the endometrium. About four cases developed on tamoxifen treatment. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2003;31(9):733–8.PubMedCrossRef
120.
Martin-Loeches M, Rius J, Orti RM. Uterine sarcoma associated with tamoxifen use: case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2003;24(2):202–3.PubMed
121.
Soh E, Eleti A, Jimenez-Linan M, Arends MJ, Latimer J, Sala E. Magnetic resonance imaging findings of tamoxifen-associated uterine Mullerian adenosarcoma: a case report. Acta Radiol. 2008;49(7):848–51.PubMed
122.
Chung YW, Bae HS, Han SI, Song JY, Kim IS, Kang JS. Endometrial mullerian adenosarcoma after toremifene treatment in breast cancer patients: a case report. J Gynecol Oncol. 2010;21(4):269–72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
123.
Kennedy MM, Baigrie CF, Manek S. Tamoxifen and the endometrium: review of 102 cases and comparison with HRT-related and non-HRT-related endometrial pathology. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1999;18(2):130–7.PubMedCrossRef
124.
Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, Redmond CK, Kavanah M, Cronin WM, et al. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90(18):1371–88.PubMedCrossRef
125.
Press MF, Scully RE. Endometrial “sarcomas” complicating ovarian thecoma, polycystic ovarian disease and estrogen therapy. Gynecol Oncol. 1985;21(2):135–54.PubMedCrossRef
126.
Lai CR, Hsu CY, Li AF. Uterine adenosarcoma detected by conventional papanicolaou smear: a case report with emphasis on integrating the immunocytochemical staining. Diagn Cytopathol. 2012;40(10):920–4.PubMedCrossRef
127.
Pasternak S, MacIntosh R. Uterine adenosarcoma detected by Papanicolaou smear: a case report. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006;34(7):495–8.PubMedCrossRef
128.
Shah SH, Jagannathan JP, Krajewski K, O’Regan KN, George S, Ramaiya NH. Uterine sarcomas: then and now. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(1):213–23.PubMedCrossRef
129.
Santos P, Cunha TM. Uterine sarcomas: clinical presentation and MRI features. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2015;21(1):4–9.PubMedCrossRef
130.
Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Yoshida S, Kudo E, Bando Y, Hasebe H, et al. Adenosarcoma of the uterus: magnetic resonance imaging characteristics. Clin Imaging. 2009;33(3):244–7.PubMedCrossRef
131.
Tirumani SH, Ojili V, Shanbhogue AK, Fasih N, Ryan JG, Reinhold C. Current concepts in the imaging of uterine sarcoma. Abdom Imaging. 2013;38(2):397–411.PubMedCrossRef
132.
McCluggage WG. Mullerian adenosarcoma of the female genital tract. Adv Anat Pathol. 2010;17(2):122–9.PubMedCrossRef
133.
Pinto A, Howitt B. Uterine adenosarcoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016;140(3):286–90.PubMedCrossRef
134.
Friedlander ML, Covens A, Glasspool RM, Hilpert F, Kristensen G, Kwon S, et al. Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) consensus review for mullerian adenosarcoma of the female genital tract. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24(9 Suppl 3):S78–82.PubMedCrossRef
135.
Howitt BE, Quade BJ, Nucci MR. Uterine polyps with features overlapping with those of Mullerian adenosarcoma: a clinicopathologic analysis of 29 cases emphasizing their likely benign nature. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39(1):116–26.PubMedCrossRef
136.
Soslow RA, Ali A, Oliva E. Mullerian adenosarcomas: an immunophenotypic analysis of 35 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32(7):1013–21.PubMedCrossRef
137.
Van Mieghem T, Abeler VM, Moerman P, Verbist L, Vergote I, Amant F. CD10, estrogen and progesterone receptor expression in ovarian adenosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;99(2):493–6.PubMedCrossRef
138.
Mikami Y, Hata S, Kiyokawa T, Manabe T. Expression of CD10 in malignant mullerian mixed tumors and adenosarcomas: an immunohistochemical study. Mod Pathol. 2002;15(9):923–30.PubMedCrossRef
139.
Aggarwal N, Bhargava R, Elishaev E. Uterine adenosarcomas: diagnostic use of the proliferation marker Ki-67 as an adjunct to morphologic diagnosis. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2012;31(5):447–52.PubMedCrossRef
140.
Abeler VM, Nenodovic M. Diagnostic immunohistochemistry in uterine sarcomas: a study of 397 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2011;30(3):236–43.PubMedCrossRef
141.
D’Angelo E, Prat J. Diagnostic use of immunohistochemistry in uterine mesenchymal tumors. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2014;31(3):216–22.PubMedCrossRef
142.
Erdogan G, Bassorgun CI, Pestereli HE, Simsek T, Karaveli S. C-kit protein expression in uterine and ovarian mesenchymal tumours. APMIS. 2007;115(3):204–9.PubMedCrossRef
143.
Kildal W, Pradhan M, Abeler VM, Kristensen GB, Danielsen HE. Beta-catenin expression in uterine sarcomas and its relation to clinicopathological parameters. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(13):2412–7.PubMedCrossRef
144.
Ioffe YJ, Li AJ, Walsh CS, Karlan BY, Leuchter R, Forscher C, et al. Hormone receptor expression in uterine sarcomas: prognostic and therapeutic roles. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;115(3):466–71.PubMedCrossRef
145.
•• Howitt BE, Sholl LM, Dal Cin P, Jia Y, Yuan L, MacConaill L, et al. Targeted genomic analysis of Mullerian adenosarcoma. J Pathol. 2015;235(1):37–49. First targeted genomic analysis of uterine adenosarcoma, showing mutations in the PTEN/AKT/PI3K pathway in ∼ 70% of patients.PubMedCrossRef
146.
•• Howitt BE, Dal Cin P, Nucci MR, Quade BJ. Involvement of Chromosome 8 in Mullerian Adenosarcoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2016. Cytogenetic characterization of uterine adenosarcomas, with first description of chromosome 8 abnormalities in 71% of cases.
147.
Swisher EM, Gown AM, Skelly M, Ek M, Tamimi HK, Cain JM, et al. The expression of epidermal growth factor receptor, HER-2/Neu, p53, and Ki-67 antigen in uterine malignant mixed mesodermal tumors and adenosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;60(1):81–8.PubMedCrossRef
148.
Kerner H, Levy R, Friedman M, Beck D. Uterine and extrauterine Mullerian adenosarcoma: a histopathologic and flow cytometric study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1997;7(4):318–24.CrossRef
149.
Amant F, Vloeberghs V, Woestenborghs H, Debiec-Rychter M, Verbist L, Moerman P, et al. ERBB-2 gene overexpression and amplification in uterine sarcomas. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;95(3):583–7.PubMedCrossRef
150.
Hoang LN, Ali RH, Lau S, Gilks CB, Lee CH. Immunohistochemical survey of mismatch repair protein expression in uterine sarcomas and carcinosarcomas. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2014;33(5):483–91.PubMedCrossRef
151.
Zaloudek CJ, Norris HJ. Adenofibroma and adenosarcoma of the uterus: a clinicopathologic study of 35 cases. Cancer. 1981;48(2):354–66.PubMedCrossRef
152.
Corrigendum to “FIGO staging for uterine sarcomas” [Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;104(3):179]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009; 106(3):277.
153.
Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT, Nam JH. The impact of tumor morcellation during surgery on the outcomes of patients with apparently early low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma of the uterus. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(12):3453–61.PubMedCrossRef
154.
Park JY, Park SK, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT, et al. The impact of tumor morcellation during surgery on the prognosis of patients with apparently early uterine leiomyosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;122(2):255–9.PubMedCrossRef
155.
Han XY, Xiang Y, Guo LN, Sheng K, Wan XR, Huang HF, et al. Mullerian adenosarcoma of the uterus: a clinicopathologic analysis of 9 cases. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2010;32(1):44–7.PubMed
156.
Koh WJ, Greer BE, Abu-Rustum N, Apte SM, Campos SM, Cho KR, et al. NCCN Clinical Practure Guidelines in Oncology Uterine Neoplams Version 2.2015: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2015 [cited 2015 9/15/2015]. Available from: http://​www.​nccn.​org/​professionals/​physician_​gls/​pdf/​uterineneoplams.​pdf.
157.
Michener CM, Simon NL. Ovarian conservation in a woman of reproductive age with mullerian adenosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;83(2):424–7.PubMedCrossRef
158.
Ozmen B, Uzum N, Unlu C, Ortac F, Ataoglu O. Surgical conservation of both ovaries in an adolescent with uterine mullerian adenosarcoma: a case report. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14(3):375–8.PubMedCrossRef
159.
Klopp A, Smith BD, Alektiar K, Cabrera A, Damato AL, Erickson B, et al. The role of postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer: executive summary of an American Society for Radiation Oncology evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014;4(3):137–44.PubMedCrossRef
160.
Reed NS, Mangioni C, Malmstrom H, Scarfone G, Poveda A, Pecorelli S, et al. Phase III randomised study to evaluate the role of adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy in the treatment of uterine sarcomas stages I and II: an European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gynaecological Cancer Group Study (protocol 55874). Eur J Cancer. 2008;44(6):808–18.PubMedCrossRef
161.
Viswanathan AN, Lee LJ, Eswara JR, Horowitz NS, Konstantinopoulos PA, Mirabeau-Beale KL, et al. Complications of pelvic radiation in patients treated for gynecologic malignancies. Cancer. 2014;120(24):3870–83.PubMedCrossRef
162.
Maki RG, Wathen JK, Patel SR, Priebat DA, Okuno SH, Samuels B, et al. Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and docetaxel compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas: results of sarcoma alliance for research through collaboration study 002 [corrected]. J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2007;25(19):2755–63.CrossRef
163.
Hensley ML, Blessing JA, Mannel R, Rose PG. Fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus docetaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group phase II trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109(3):329–34.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
164.
Hensley ML, Ishill N, Soslow R, Larkin J, Abu-Rustum N, Sabbatini P, et al. Adjuvant gemcitabine plus docetaxel for completely resected stages I-IV high grade uterine leiomyosarcoma: results of a prospective study. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;112(3):563–7.PubMedCrossRef
165.
Hensley ML, Wathen JK, Maki RG, Araujo DM, Sutton G, Priebat DA, et al. Adjuvant therapy for high-grade, uterus-limited leiomyosarcoma: results of a phase 2 trial (SARC 005). Cancer. 2013;119(8):1555–61.PubMedCrossRef
166.
Kanjeekal S, Chambers A, Fung MF, Verma S. Systemic therapy for advanced uterine sarcoma: a systematic review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;97(2):624–37.PubMedCrossRef
167.
Odunsi K, Moneke V, Tammela J, Ghamande S, Seago P, Driscoll D, et al. Efficacy of adjuvant CYVADIC chemotherapy in early-stage uterine sarcomas: results of long-term follow-up. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004;14(4):659–64.PubMedCrossRef
168.
Huang GS, Arend RC, Sakaris A, Hebert TM, Goldberg GL. Extragenital adenosarcoma: a case report, review of the literature, and management discussion. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;115(3):472–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
169.
Guidozzi F, Smith T, Koller AB, Reinecke L. Management of uterine Mullerian adenosarcoma with extrauterine metastatic deposits. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;77(3):464–6.PubMedCrossRef
170.
Yamagami W, Susumu N, Ninomiya T, Kuwahata M, Takigawa A, Nomura H, et al. A retrospective study on combination therapy with ifosfamide, adriamycin and cisplatin for progressive or recurrent uterine sarcoma. Mol Clin Oncol. 2014;2(4):591–5.PubMedPubMedCentral
171.
Verschraegen CF, Arias-Pulido H, Lee SJ, Movva S, Cerilli LA, Eberhardt S, et al. Phase IB study of the combination of docetaxel, gemcitabine, and bevacizumab in patients with advanced or recurrent soft tissue sarcoma: the Axtell regimen. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(3):785–90.PubMedCrossRef
172.
del Carmen MG, Lovett D, Goodman A. A case of Mullerian adenosarcoma of the uterus treated with liposomal doxorubicin. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;88(3):456–8.PubMedCrossRef
173.
Maeda M, Mabuchi S, Matsumoto Y, Hisamatsu T, Ohashi H, Kimura T. Activity of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for extragenital mullerian adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth: a case report and a review of the literature. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2011;32(5):542–6.PubMed
174.
Schroeder BA, Rodler ET, Loggers ET, Pollack SM, Jones RL. Clinical benefit of trabectedin in uterine adenosarcoma. Med Oncol. 2013;30(2):501.PubMedCrossRef
175.
Roman LD, Mitchell MF, Tornos C, Glover A, Kavanagh JJ. Dedifferentiated extrauterine adenosarcoma responsive to chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;49(3):389–94.PubMedCrossRef
176.
Hines BJ, Porges RF, Mittal K, Muggia FM, Curtin JP. Use of medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of Mullerian adenosarcoma: a case report. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;85(1):192–5.PubMedCrossRef
177.
Lee SJ, Bae JH, Kim DC, Park JS, Namkoong SE. Oral progesterone treatment in a young woman with mullerian adenosarcoma whose ovary was preserved: a case report. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010;20(7):1222–4.PubMedCrossRef
178.
Gruber TJ, Fabiano AJ, Deeb G, Lele SB, Fenstermaker RA. Intracranial meningiomas in patients with uterine sarcoma treated with long-term megestrol acetate therapy. World Neurosurg. 2011;76(5):477.e16–20.CrossRef
179.
Tasaka N, Matsumoto K, Satoh T, Minaguchi T, Onuki M, Ochi H, et al. Therapeutic effect of dienogest on adenosarcoma arising from endometriosis: a case report. Springerplus. 2013;2:618.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
180.
Moinfar F, Azodi M, Tavassoli FA. Uterine sarcomas. Pathology. 2007;39(1):55–71.PubMedCrossRef