Skip to main content

03-01-2018 | Melanoma | Article

Follow-Up Recommendations after Diagnosis of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma: A Population-Based Study in New South Wales, Australia

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Authors: MBBS, DPhil, FRACS Rebecca L. Read, MPhil, DipHSci, BAppSci, MPH Christine M. Madronio, PhD, MPH (Hons), BSc, BA Anne E. Cust, MPH Chris Goumas, PhD Caroline G. Watts, MBBS, PhD Scott Menzies, MBBS, FRACS Austin M. Curtin, MBBS, PhD Graham Mann, MD, FRACS, FACS John F. Thompson, MScMed (Clin Epi) (Hons), PhD Rachael L. Morton

Publisher: Springer International Publishing



Follow-up practices after diagnosis and treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma vary considerably. We aimed to determine factors associated with recommendations for follow-up setting, frequency, skin surveillance, and concordance with clinical guidelines.


The population-based Melanoma Patterns of Care study documented clinicians’ recommendations for follow-up for 2148 patients diagnosed with primary cutaneous melanoma over a 12-month period (2006/2007) in New South Wales, Australia. Multivariate log binomial regression models adjusted for patient and lesion characteristics were used to examine factors associated with follow-up practices.


Of 2158 melanomas, Breslow thickness was < 1 mm for 57% and ≥ 1 mm for 30%, while in situ melanomas accounted for 13%. Follow-up was recommended for 2063 patients (96%). On multivariate analysis, factors associated with a recommendation for follow-up at a specialist center were Breslow thickness ≥ 1 mm [prevalence ratio (PR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.09] and initial treatment at a specialist center (PR 1.12, 95% CI 1.08–1.16). Longer follow-up intervals of > 3 months were more likely to be recommended for females, less likely for people living in rural compared with urban areas, and less likely for thicker (≥ 1 mm) melanomas compared with in situ melanomas. Skin self-examination was encouraged in 84% of consultations and was less likely to be recommended for patients ≥ 70 years (PR 0.88, 95% CI 0.84–0.93) and for those with thicker (≥ 1 mm) melanomas (PR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86–0.99). Only 1% of patients were referred for psychological care.


Follow-up recommendations were generally consistent with Australian national guidelines for management of melanoma, however some variations could be targeted to improve patient outcomes.

Please log in to get access to this content

Related topics