Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Classification of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving therapy: New primary cancer allows a good prognosis

  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To classify and assess ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences (IBTR) after breast-conserving therapy.

Methods

Between 1986 and 2001, 2,137 patients who had breast cancer underwent breast-conserving surgery with or without radiotherapy at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research. Of these patients, 83 (3.9%) had an IBTR. We classified the IBTR as a new primary cancer (NP) if the primary tumor had completely negative margins at first operation by detailed pathological examination and if the IBTR had an intraductal component. All other IBTRs were judged true local recurrence (TR).

Results

Of the 83 patients, 42 patients were classified as TR (29 had no radiotherapy) and 41 as NP (40 had no radiotherapy). Mean time to disease recurrence was 37 months for TR (52% were within 2 years) versus 55 months for NP (19% were within 2 years) (p= 0.031). Six patients (14%) with TR did not receive re-operation, and 67% received salvage mastectomy and 19% re-lumpectomy. All cases of NP were operable, 78% underwent salvage mastectomy and 22% underwent re-lumpectomy. Distant metastases were observed in 33% of patients with TR and 5% of patients with NP, and cause-specific death occurred in 6 cases with TR and in one with NP. The patients with NP had improved 5-year rates of overall survival (NP 91% vs. TR 76%,P= 0.0627) and distant disease-free survival (NP 93% vs. TR 61%,P= 0.0028). Patients with NP more often developed contralateral breast cancer (NP 37% vs. TR 12%,P= 0.018)

Conclusions

Patients with NP had better survival rates than those with TR. Distinguishing new primary breast carcinomas from local disease recurrences may have importance in therapeutic decisions and chemoprevention strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A, Aguilar M, Marubini E: Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer.N Engl J Med 347:1227–1232, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, Jeong JH, Wolmark N: Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer.N Engl J Med 347:1233–1241, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Harris JR, Vicini FA: 45th Annual meeting of the American Society Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology ASTRO breast cancer: Multidisciplinary breast cancer management — part II : Radiation Issues, Course 309, 2003.

  4. Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Craig PH, Waisman JR, Lewinsky BS, Colburn WJ, Poller DN: A prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.Cancer 77:2267–2274, 1996.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang E, Buchholz TA, Meric F, Krishnamurthy S, Mirzab NQ, Ames FC, Feig BW, Kuerer HM, Ross MI, Singletary SE, McNeese MD, Strom EA, Hunt KK: Classifying local disease recurrences after breast coservation therapy based on location and histology.Cancer 95:2059–2067, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith TE, Daesung L, Turner BC, Carter D, Haffty BG: True recurrence vs. new primary ipsilateral breast tumor relapse: an analysis of clinical and pathological differences and their implications in natural history, prognosis, and therapeutic management.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 48:1281–1289, 2000.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Takahashi K, Makita M, Tada T, Yoshimoto M, Kasumi F, Akiyama F, Sakamoto G: Breast conseving treatment without radiotherapy.Biomed Pharmac 56:201–204, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Salvadori B, Marubini E, Miceli R, Conti AR, Cusumano F, Adnreola S, Zucali R, Veroneci U: Reoperation for locally recurrent breast cancer in patients previously treated with conservative surgery.Bri J Surg 86:84–87, 1999.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kurtz JM, Amalric R, Brandone H, Ayme Y, Jacquemier J, Pietra JC, Hans D, Pollet JF, Bressac C, Spitalier JM: Local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy. Frequency, time course, and prognosis.Cancer 63:1912–1917, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seiichiro Nishimura.

About this article

Cite this article

Nishimura, S., Takahashi, K., Akiyama, F. et al. Classification of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving therapy: New primary cancer allows a good prognosis. Breast Cancer 12, 112–117 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2325/jbcs.12.112

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2325/jbcs.12.112

Key words

Navigation