Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Induction of a Pathological Complete Response by Four Courses of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer: Early Results of the Randomized Phase II COMPASS Trial

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The prognosis for stage 3 gastric cancer is not satisfactory, even with S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. A randomized phase II trial was conducted to compare two and four courses of neoadjuvant S-1/cisplatin (SC) and paclitaxel/cisplatin (PC) using a two-by-two factorial design for locally advanced gastric cancer. The primary endpoint was overall survival. We clarified the impact of these regimens on the secondary endpoints, including the clinical and pathological responses, chemotherapy-related toxicities, and surgical results.

Methods

Patients received S-1 (80 mg/m2 for 21 days with 1 week’s rest)/cisplatin (60 mg/m2 at day 8) or paclitaxel/cisplatin (80 and 25 mg/m2, respectively, on days 1, 8, and 15 with 1 week’s rest) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Results

Eighty-three patients were assigned to arm A (two courses of SC, n = 21), arm B (four courses of SC, n = 20), arm C (two courses of PC, n = 21), and arm D (four courses of PC, n = 21). Pathological response rate was 43 % in arm A, 40 % in arm B, 29 % in arm C, and 38 % in arm D. Pathological complete response was only observed in arms B (10 %) and D (10 %). Most bone marrow toxicities, nausea, vomiting, alopecia, and fatigue were slightly higher but acceptable in arms B and D. Grade 3/4 surgical morbidities were not commonly observed in all four arms.

Conclusions

Pathological complete response could be induced by four courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy without a marked increase of toxicities, regardless of a SC or PC regimen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–917.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yoshikawa T, Sasako M. Gastrointestinal cancer: adjuvant chemotherapy after D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012;9:192–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Association TJGC. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:113–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, Kinoshita T, Fujii M, Nashimoto A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1810–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bang YJ, Kim YW, Yang HK, Chung HC, Park YK, Lee KH, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): a phase 3 open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9813):315–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sasako M, Sakuramoto S, Katai H, Kinoshita T, Furukawa H, Yamaguchi T, et al. Five-year outcomes of a randomized phase III trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 versus surgery alone in stage II or III gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4387–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, Van de Velde CJ, Nicolson M, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Okines A, Verheij M, Allum W, Cunningham D, Cervantes A. Gastric cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(Suppl 5):v50–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ychou M, Boige V, Pignon JP, Conroy T, Bouche O, Lebreton G, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1715–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ng K, Meyerhardt JA, Fuchs CS. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant approaches in gastric cancer. Cancer J. 2007;13:168–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T, Takagane A, Akiya T, Takagi M, et al. S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:215–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Takahari D, Hamaguchi T, Yoshimura K, Katai H, Ito S, Fuse N, et al. Feasibility study of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin for gastric cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011;67:1423–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kodera Y, Ishiyama A, Yoshikawa T, Kinoshita T, Ito S, Yokoyama H, et al. A feasibility study of postoperative chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin (CDDP) for gastric carcinoma (CCOG0703). Gastric Cancer. 2010;13:197–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Inoue K, Nakane Y, Kogire M, Fujitani K, Kimura Y, Imamura H, et al. Phase II trial of preoperative S-1 plus cisplatin followed by surgery for initially unresectable locally advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38:143–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nashimoto A, Yabusaki H, Nakagawa S, Takii Y, Tsuchiya Y, Otsuo T. Preoperative chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin for highly advanced gastric cancer. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:4689–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoshikawa T, Omura K, Kobayashi O, Nashimoto A, Takabayashi A, Yamada T, et al. A phase II study of preoperative chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin followed by D2/D3 gastrectomy for clinically serosa-positive gastric cancer (JACCRO GC-01 study). Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010;36:546–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sakamoto J, Matsui T, Kodera Y. Paclitaxel chemotherapy for the treatment of gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2009;12:69–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nishikawa K, Morita S, Matsui T, Kobayashi M, Takeuchi Y, Takahashi I, et al. A randomized phase-II trial comparing sequential and concurrent paclitaxel with oral or parenteral fluorinated pyrimidines for advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2012;15:363–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsuburaya A, Sakamoto J, Morita S, Kodera Y, Kobayashi M, Miyashita Y, et al. A randomized phase III trial of post-operative adjuvant oral fluoropyrimidine versus sequential paclitaxel/oral fluoropyrimidine; and UFT versus S1 for T3/T4 gastric carcinoma: the Stomach Cancer Adjuvant Multi-institutional Trial Group (Samit) trial. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2005;35:672–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nagata N, Kimura M, Hirabayashi N, Tuburaya A, Murata T, Kondo K, et al. Phase II study of weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin combination therapy for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55:1846–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tsuburaya A, Nagata N, Cho H, Hirabayashi N, Kobayashi M, Kojima H, et al. Phase II trial of paclitaxel and cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;71:1309–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yoshikawa T, Sasako M, Yamamoto S, Sano T, Imamura H, Fujitani K, et al. Phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and extended surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96:1015–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yoshikawa T, Tsuburaya A, Morita S, Kodera Y, Ito S, Cho H, et al. A comparison of multimodality treatment: two or four courses of paclitaxel plus cisplatin or S-1 plus cisplatin followed by surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer, a randomized Phase II trial (COMPASS). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010;40:369–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Habermann CR, Weiss F, Riecken R, Honarpisheh H, Bohnacker S, Staedtler C, et al. Preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma: comparison of helical CT and endoscopic US. Radiology. 2004;230:465–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hasegawa S, Yoshikawa T, Shirai J, Fujikawa H, Cho H, Doiuchi T, et al. A prospective validation study to diagnose serosal invasion and nodal metastases of gastric cancer by multidetector-row CT. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(6):2016–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Simon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Witterkind CH. International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM classification of malignant tumors. 7th ed. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang LB, Teng RY, Jiang ZN, Hu WX, Dong MJ, Yuan XM, et al. Clinicopathologic variables predicting tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2012;105:293–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mansour JC, Tang L, Shah M, Bentrem D, Klimstra DS, Gonen M, et al. Does graded histologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predict survival for completely resected gastric cancer? Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:3412–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yoshikawa T, Nakamura K, Tsuburaya A, Sano T, Mizusawa J, Katai H, et al. A phase II study of preoperative chemotherapy with S-1 (S) and cisplatin (P) followed by D3 gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC) with extensive lymph node metastasis (ELM): survival results of JCOG0405. Presented at Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, San Francisco, CA, 2011.

  33. Kodera Y, Ito S, Mochizuki Y, Ohashi N, Tanaka C, Kobayashi D, et al. Long-term follow up of patients who were positive for peritoneal lavage cytology: final report from the CCOG0301 study. Gastric Cancer. 2012;15:335–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by Epidemiological & Clinical Research Information Network (ECRIN).

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takaki Yoshikawa MD, PhD.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (EPS 916 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 46 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoshikawa, T., Tanabe, K., Nishikawa, K. et al. Induction of a Pathological Complete Response by Four Courses of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer: Early Results of the Randomized Phase II COMPASS Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 21, 213–219 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3055-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3055-x

Keywords

Navigation