Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Response to Therapy as a Criterion for Awarding Priority to Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Awaiting Liver Transplantation

  • Hepatobiliary Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

How to prioritize patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for liver transplantation (LT) remains controversial. This study was designed to assess the effectiveness of a policy for prioritizing HCC patients according to their response to pre-LT therapy.

Methods

The study period was from 2000 to 2008. Dropout criteria included macroscopic vascular invasion, metastases, and poorly differentiated grade at pre-LT biopsy. A specific treatment algorithm was adopted to treat HCC before LT, and the effect of treatment was evaluated 3 months after listing or after the diagnosis of HCC for patients diagnosed while already on the waiting list. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1, patients with disease that completely or partially responded to therapy; and group 2, patients with stable, progressive, or untreatable disease. Group 2 patients were prioritized for LT unless full restaging and repeat biopsy identified dropout criteria.

Results

At the 3-month visit, 62 HCC patients (42%) were assigned to group 2 and 85 (58%) to group 1. Eleven of 12 dropouts due to tumor progression came from group 2 (P < 0.01). Response to therapy was the sole predictor of dropout probability, independent of tumor stage (competing risk analysis). The 42 patients in group 2 who were transplanted had much the same 3-year post-LT survival rate as the 57 transplanted patients in group 1 (with survival rates of 82% and 83%, respectively; P > 0.05), but a slightly higher risk of post-LT HCC recurrence (13% and 2%, respectively; P = 0.04).

Conclusions

Response to therapy is a potentially effective tool for prioritizing HCC patients for LT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harper AM, Edwards EB, Eleison MD. The OPTN waiting list, 1988–2000. Clin Transpl. 2001;73–85.

  2. Llovet JM, Fuster J, Bruix J. Intention-to-treat analysis of surgical treatment for early hepatocellular carcinoma: resection versus transplantation. Hepatology. 1999;30:1434–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yao FY, Bass NM, Nikolai B, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Analysis of survival according to the intention-to-treat principle, and drop-out from the waiting list. Liver Transplant. 2002;8:873–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Malinchoc M, Karnath PS, Gordon FD, et al. A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Hepatology. 2000;31:864–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Freeman RB Jr. The model for end-stage liver disease comes of age. Clin Liver Dis. 2007;11:249–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Freeman RB, Edwards EB, Harper AM. Waiting list removal rates among patients with chronic and malignant liver disease. Am J Transplant. 2006;6:1416–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ioannou GN, Perkins JD, Carithers RL. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: impact of the MELD allocation system and predictors of survival. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1342–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Poon RTP, Fan ST, Lo CM, Liu CL, Wong J. Difference in tumor invasiveness in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma fulfilling the Milan criteria treated by resection and transplantation. Ann Surg. 2007;245:51–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lo CM, Fan ST, Liu CL, et al. Living donor versus deceased donor liver transplantation for early irresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2007;94:78–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher RA, Kulik LM, Freise CE, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence and death following living and deceased donor liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2007;7:1601–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005;42:1208–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yao FY, Bass NM, Nikolai B, et al. A follow-up analysis of the pattern and predictors of dropout from the waiting list for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for the current organ allocation policy. Liver Transplant. 2003;9:684–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yao FY, Bass NM, Ascher NL, Roberts JP. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: lessons from the first year under the model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) organ allocation policy. Liver Transplant. 2004;10:621–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jonas S, Bechstein WO, Steinmuller T, et al. Vascular invasion and histopathologic grading determine outcome after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2001;33:1080–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Klintmalm GB. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a registry report of the impact of the tumor characteristics on outcome. Ann Surg. 1998;228:479–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Marsh JW, Dvorichik I, Subotin M, et al. The prediction of risk of recurrence and time to recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after orthotopic liver transplantation: a pilot study. Hepatology. 1997;26:444–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Graziadei IW, Sandmueller H, Waldenberger P, et al. Chemoembolization followed by liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma impedes tumor progression while on the waiting list and leads to excellent outcome. Liver Transplant. 2003;9:557–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lu DSK, Yu NC, Raman SS, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma as a bridge to liver transplantation. Hepatology. 2005;41:1130–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Belghiti J, Cortes A, Abdalla EK, et al. Resection prior to liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2003;238:885–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yao FY, Kinkhabwala M, La Berge JM, et al. The impact of pre-operative loco-regional therapy on outcome after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:795–804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Merion RM, Schaubel DE, Dykstra DM, et al. The survival benefit of liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:307–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cillo U, Vitale A, Grigoletto F, et al. Intention-to-treat analysis of liver transplantation in selected, aggressively treated HCC patients exceeding the Milan criteria. Am J Transplant. 2007;7:972–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cillo U, Vitale A, Bassanello M, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of moderately or well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2004;239:150–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cillo U, Vitale A, Grigoletto F, et al. Prospective validation of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system. J Hepatol. 2006;44:723–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bassanello M, Cillo U, Vitale A, et al. Multimodal approach and its impact on survival for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2003;23:4047–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cillo U, Bassanello M, Vitale A, et al. The critical issue of hepatocellular carcinoma prognostic classification: which is the best tool available? J Hepatol. 2004;40:124–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vitale A, Brolese A, Zanus G, et al. Multimodal therapy before liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res. 2005;31:112–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cillo U, Vitale A, Brolese A, et al. Partial hepatectomy as first line treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2007;95:213–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Park JO, Lee SII, Song SY, et al. Measuring response in solid tumors: comparison of RECIST and WHO response criteria. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2003;33:533–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM, et al. Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusion of the Barcelona-2000 EASL Conference. J Hepatol. 2001;35:421–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Volk M, Marrero JA. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: who benefits and who is harmed? Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1612–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Volk ML, Vijan S, Marrero JA. A novel model measuring the harm of transplanting hepatocellular carcinoma exceeding Milan criteria. Am J Transplant. 2008;8:839–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:693–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Majno PE, Sarasin FP, Mentha G, Hadengue A. Primary liver resection and salvage transplantation or primary liver transplantation in patients with single, small hepatocellular carcinoma and preserved liver function: an outcome-oriented decision analysis. Hepatology. 2000;31:899–906.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Belghiti J, Durand F. Hepatectomy vs. liver transplantation: a combination rather than an opposition. Liver Transplant. 2007;13:636–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Otto G, Herber S, Heise M, et al. Response to transarterial chemoembolization as a biological selection criterion for liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transplant. 2006;12:1260–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Millonig G, Graziadei IW, Freund MC, et al. Response to preoperative chemoembolization correlates with outcome after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transplant. 2007;13:272–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mazzaferro V, Llovet JM, Miceli R, et al. Predicting survival after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: a retrospective, exploratory analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:35–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Vitale MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vitale, A., D’Amico, F., Frigo, A.C. et al. Response to Therapy as a Criterion for Awarding Priority to Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Awaiting Liver Transplantation. Ann Surg Oncol 17, 2290–2302 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-0993-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-0993-4

Keywords

Navigation