Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic Impact of RT-PCR-Based Detection of Peritoneal Micrometastases in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Curative Resection

  • Pancreatic Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Positive peritoneal fluid cytology predicts poor outcome in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. Reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) has been proposed as a more sensitive means of detection of peritoneal micrometastases than conventional cytology. The clinical significance of RT-PCR positivity in the absence of other evidence of peritoneal disease is unknown. The purpose of the current study was to determine the outcome RT-PCR positive/cytology-negative patients who underwent potentially curative resection.

Methods

Peritoneal washings were collected prospectively from 115 patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy at a single institution. Specimens were analyzed by a cytopathologist and by RT-PCR for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA).

Results

Of the 115 patients, 62 (54%) underwent R0 resection. Eleven of the 62 patients (18%) had peritoneal washings that were negative by conventional cytology but positive for CEA by RT-PCR. Those 11 patients experienced early peritoneal and overall disease recurrence versus those who were RT-PCR negative (P = 0.001, P = 0.003, respectively) independent of nodal status.

Conclusions

RT-PCR for CEA is a sensitive and specific method for the detection of clinically significant peritoneal micrometastases from pancreatic cancer and it might identify a subgroup of patients with otherwise negative findings at staging laparoscopy who might respond better to treatment other than primary surgical resection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. House MG, Fong Y, Arnaoutakis DJ, et al. Preoperative predictors for complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: impact of BMI and body fat distribution. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(2):270–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Williams TK, Rosato EL, Kennedy EP, et al. Impact of obesity on perioperative morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208(2):210–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bentrem DJ, Brennan MF. Outcomes in oncologic surgery: does volume make a difference? World J Surg. 2005;29(10):1210–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mayo SC, Austin DF, Sheppard BC, et al. Evolving preoperative evaluation of patients with pancreatic cancer: does laparoscopy have a role in the current era? J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208(1):87–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Soriano A, Castells A, Ayuso C, et al. Preoperative staging and tumor resectability assessment of pancreatic cancer: prospective study comparing endoscopic ultrasonography, helical computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(3):492–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Howard TJ, Chin AC, Streib EW, et al. Value of helical computed tomography, angiography, and endoscopic ultrasound in determining resectability of periampullary carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1997;174(3):237–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. White R, Winston C, Gonen M, et al. Current utility of staging laparoscopy for pancreatic and peripancreatic neoplasms. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(3):445–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tani M, Kawai M, Miyazawa M, et al. Liver metastasis as an initial recurrence has no impact on the survival of patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009;394(2):249–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jimenez RE, Warshaw AL, Fernandez-Del Castillo C. Laparoscopy and peritoneal cytology in the staging of pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000;7(1):15–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferrone CR, Haas B, Tang L, et al. The influence of positive peritoneal cytology on survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(10):1347–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yachida S, Fukushima N, Sakamoto M, et al. Implications of peritoneal washing cytology in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2002;89(5):573–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Merchant NB, Conlon KC, Saigo P, et al. Positive peritoneal cytology predicts unresectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;188(4):421–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Greene FL. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th ed.

  14. Katsuragi K, Yashiro M, Sawada T, et al. Prognostic impact of PCR-based identification of isolated tumour cells in the peritoneal lavage fluid of gastric cancer patients who underwent a curative R0 resection. Br J Cancer. 2007;97(4):550–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dalal KM, Woo Y, Kelly K, et al. Detection of micrometastases in peritoneal washings of gastric cancer patients by the reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Gastric Cancer. 2008;11(4):206–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mori K, Aoyagi K, Ueda T, et al. Highly specific marker genes for detecting minimal gastric cancer cells in cytology negative peritoneal washings. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;313(4):931–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Reis-Filho JS, de Lander Schmitt FC. Fluorescence in situ hybridization, comparative genomic hybridization, and other molecular biology techniques in the analysis of effusions. Diagn Cytopathol. 2005;33(5):294–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dalal KM, Woo Y, Galanis C, et al. Detection of micrometastases in peritoneal washings of pancreatic cancer patients by the reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11(12):1598–606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shah D, Fisher WE, Hodges SE, et al. Preoperative prediction of complete resection in pancreatic cancer. J Surg Res. 2008;147(2):216–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ahmed SI, Bochkarev V, Oleynikov D, Sasson AR. Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma benefit from staging laparoscopy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2006;16(5):458–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yonemura Y, Endou Y, Fujimura T, et al. Diagnostic value of preoperative RT-PCR-based screening method to detect carcinoembryonic antigen-expressing free cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity from patients with gastric cancer. ANZ J Surg. 2001;71(9):521–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nishiyama M, Takashima I, Tanaka T, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen levels in the peritoneal cavity: useful guide to peritoneal recurrence and prognosis for gastric cancer. World J Surg. 1995;19(1):133–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank all participating attending surgeons at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (Dr. William Jarnagin, Dr. Vivian Strong, Dr. Michael D’Angelica, and Dr. Ronald Dematteo), as well as the operating room nurses and staff for their coordinated and diligent effort in specimen collection and processing, which made this study possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Coit MD, FACS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelly, K.J., Wong, J., Gladdy, R. et al. Prognostic Impact of RT-PCR-Based Detection of Peritoneal Micrometastases in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Curative Resection. Ann Surg Oncol 16, 3333–3339 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0683-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0683-2

Keywords

Navigation