Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Myeloma

Extensive bone marrow infiltration and abnormal free light chain ratio identifies patients with asymptomatic myeloma at high risk for progression to symptomatic disease

Abstract

Asymptomatic multiple myeloma (AMM) is characterized by a constant risk of progression to symptomatic myeloma. To evaluate previously recognized risk factors and to identify high-risk features we analyzed 96 patients with AMM and at least 18 months of follow-up. The progression rate at 1,2, and 3 years was 8%, 15% and 26%, respectively, and the projected 5-year progression rate was 38%. Extensive bone marrow (BM) infiltration, abnormal free light chain (FLC) ratio and serum monoclonal (M)-protein3 gr/dl were the most significant factors for progression, whereas the type of heavy (IgG vs IgA) or light chain or immunoparesis of the uninvolved immunoglobulins were not. Abnormal marrow signal of magnetic resonance imaging of the spine was associated with a significant risk of progression (median 15 months, P=0.001). Extensive BM infiltration 60% (hazard ratio, HR: 13.7, P<0.001) and FLC ratio100 (HR: 9, P=0.003) independently identified a ‘very high-risk’ group, which included 12.5% of patients with AMM and who progressed 18 months from initial diagnosis. Development of anemia and/or lytic bone lesions were the most common features of symptomatic progression. In conclusion, there is a subgroup of patients who have a substantial risk of progression to symptomatic disease that can be detected at diagnosis (either by extensive BM infiltration60% or FLC ratio100) and may be considered for immediate treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Myeloma Working Group. Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group. Br J Haematol 2003; 121: 749–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kyle RA, Remstein ED, Therneau TM, Dispenzieri A, Kurtin PJ, Hodnefield JM et al. Clinical course and prognosis of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 2582–2590.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kyle RA, Durie BG, Rajkumar SV, Landgren O, Blade J, Merlini G et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: IMWG consensus perspectives risk factors for progression and guidelines for monitoring and management. Leukemia 2010; 24: 1121–1127.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Blade J, Dimopoulos M, Rosinol L, Rajkumar SV, Kyle RA . Smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: current diagnostic criteria, new predictors of outcome, and follow-up recommendations. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 690–697.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dispenzieri A, Kyle RA, Katzmann JA, Therneau TM, Larson D, Benson J et al. Immunoglobulin free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. Blood 2008; 111: 785–789.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Perez-Persona E, Vidriales MB, Mateo G, Garcia-Sanz R, Mateos MV, de Coca AG et al. New criteria to identify risk of progression in monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance and smoldering multiple myeloma based on multiparameter flow cytometry analysis of bone marrow plasma cells. Blood 2007; 110: 2586–2592.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hillengass J, Fechtner K, Weber MA, Bauerle T, Ayyaz S, Heiss C et al. Prognostic significance of focal lesions in whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in patients with asymptomatic multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 1606–1610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosinol L, Blade J, Esteve J, Aymerich M, Rozman M, Montoto S et al. Smoldering multiple myeloma: natural history and recognition of an evolving type. Br J Haematol 2003; 123: 631–636.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moulopoulos LA, Dimopoulos MA, Smith TL, Weber DM, Delasalle KB, Libshitz HI et al. Prognostic significance of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with asymptomatic multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 251–256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Moulopoulos LA, Dimopoulos MA, Christoulas D, Kastritis E, Anagnostou D, Koureas A et al. Diffuse MRI marrow pattern correlates with increased angiogenesis, advanced disease features and poor prognosis in newly diagnosed myeloma treated with novel agents. Leukemia 2010; 24: 1206–1212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Moulopoulos LA, Dimopoulos MA, Kastritis E, Christoulas D, Gkotzamanidou M, Roussou M et al. Diffuse pattern of bone marrow involvement on magnetic resonance imaging is associated with high risk cytogenetics and poor outcome in newly diagnosed, symptomatic patients with multiple myeloma: a single center experience on 228 patients. Am J Hematol 2012; 87: 861–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE . Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Stat Med 1999; 18: 695–706.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Musto P, Petrucci MT, Bringhen S, Guglielmelli T, Caravita T, Bongarzoni V et al. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing zoledronic acid versus observation in patients with asymptomatic myeloma. Cancer 2008; 113: 1588–1595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mateos M-V, Lopez-Corral L, Hernandez M, Giraldo P, De La Rubia J, de Arriba F et al. Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) at high-risk of progression to symptomatic disease: a phase III, randomized, multicenter trial based on lenalidomide-dexamethasone (len-dex) as induction therapy followed by maintenance therapy with len alone vs no treatment. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 2011; 118: 991.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Terpstra WE, Lokhorst HM, Blomjous F, Meuwissen OJ, Dekker AW . Comparison of plasma cell infiltration in bone marrow biopsies and aspirates in patients with multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 1992; 82: 46–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Joshi R, Horncastle D, Elderfield K, Lampert I, Rahemtulla A, Naresh KN . Bone marrow trephine combined with immunohistochemistry is superior to bone marrow aspirate in follow-up of myeloma patients. J Clin Pathol 2008; 61: 213–216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stifter S, Babarovic E, Valkovic T, Seili-Bekafigo I, Stemberger C, Nacinovic A et al. Combined evaluation of bone marrow aspirate and biopsy is superior in the prognosis of multiple myeloma. Diagn Pathol 2010; 5: 30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rajkumar SV, Larson D, Kyle RA . Diagnosis of smoldering multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 474–475.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Larsen JT, Kumar S, Rajkumar SV . Serum free light chain ratio in distinguishing smoldering multiple myeloma from active multiple myeloma. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 2011; 118: 3948.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D’Arena G, Gobbi PG, Broglia C, Sacchi S, Quarta G, Baldini L et al. Pamidronate versus observation in asymptomatic myeloma: final results with long-term follow-up of a randomized study. Leuk Lymphoma 2011; 52: 771–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Heuck C, Sexton R, Dhodapkar M, Zhang Q, Usmani S, Nair B et al. SWOG S0120 observational trial for MGUS and asymptomatic multiple myeloma (AMM): imaging predictors of progression for patients treated at UAMS. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 118: 3955.

  22. Zamagni E, Patriarca F, Nanni C, Zannetti B, Englaro E, Pezzi A et al. Prognostic relevance of 18-F FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with up-front autologous transplantation. Blood 2011; 118: 5989–5995.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zamagni E, Nanni C, Patriarca F, Englaro E, Castellucci P, Geatti O et al. A prospective comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and whole-body planar radiographs in the assessment of bone disease in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2007; 92: 50–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M A Dimopoulos.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kastritis, E., Terpos, E., Moulopoulos, L. et al. Extensive bone marrow infiltration and abnormal free light chain ratio identifies patients with asymptomatic myeloma at high risk for progression to symptomatic disease. Leukemia 27, 947–953 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2012.309

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2012.309

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links