Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Building the infrastructure for nationwide cancer surveillance and control – a comparison between The National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (United States)

  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: In preparation for jointly publishing official government cancer statistics, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) compared incidence rates from NCI's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program and CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). Methods: Data for 1999 covering 78% of the US population were obtained from SEER and selected NPCR registries that met high quality data criteria. incidence rates (per 100,000 population) were age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population, and 95% gamma confidence intervals were estimated Results: NPCR rates for all sites combined were higher than SEER rates (males: NPCR 553.6, SEER 538.7; females: NPCR 420.8, SEER 412.5), but rates for specific cancer sites varied by registry program. Rates for colon cancer (males: NPCR 47.0, SEER 42.7; females: NPCR 36.5, SEER 33.8) and tobacco-related cancers were higher in NPCR than SEER. In contrast, NPCR rates were lower than SEER rates for cancers of the female breaset (NPCR 134.0, SEER 135.9), prostate (NPCR 162.0, SEER 170.2), and melanoma as well as for cancers more common among Asians and Pacific Islanders (e.g., stomach cancer).Conclusions: Rate differences may arise from population difference in socio-demographic characteristics, screening use, health behaviors, exposure to cancer causing agents or registry operations factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thacker SB,Berkelman RL (1988) Public health surveillance in the United States. Epidemiol Rev 10: 164-190.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hiatt RA,Rimer BK (1999) A new strategy for cancer control research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8: 957-964.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control (2001) Atlanta, GA: Comprehensive Cancer Control: A Model Public Health Strategy.

  4. Abrams DB (1997) A New Agenda for Cancer Control Research: Report of the Cancer Control Review Group. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The National Cancer Act of 1971, Pub L 92-218, 85 Stat 1828 (December 23, 1971). Available from: http://www3.cancer.gov/ legis/1971canc.html, accessed August 2002.

  6. Ries LAG,Eisner MP,Kosary CL, et al. (eds) (2002) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973-1999. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. Available from http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1973-1999/.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hutton MD,Simpson LD,Miller DS,Weir HK,McDavid K,Hall HI (2001) Progress toward nationwide cancer surveillance: an evaluation of the national program of cancer registries, 1994-1999. J Registry Manage 28(3): 113-120.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hultstrom D (ed.) (2001) Standards for Cancer Registries, Volume II: Data Standards and Data Dictionary, version 9.1., 6th edn. Springfield (IL): North American Association of Central Cancer Registries.

    Google Scholar 

  9. North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) (2000) Standards for Cancer Registries, Volume III: Standards for Completeness, Quality, Analysis, and Management of Data. Springfield (IL): North American Association of Central Cancer Registries.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (1994) State cancer registries: status of authorizing legislation and enabling regulations-United States, October 1993. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 43(4): 71-75.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Senate and House of Representatives of the United States (October 24, 1992). Public Law 102-515, Cancer Registries Amendment Act. Diseases. Health and Health Care. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Swan J,Wingo PA,Clive R, et al. (1998) Cancer surveillance in the U.S.: can we have a national system? Cancer 83: 1282-1291.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hutchison CL,Roffers SC,Fritz AG (1997) Cancer Registry Management: Principles and Practice. Lenexa, KS: National Cancer Registrars Association.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fritz A,Ries L (eds) (1998) The SEER Program Code Manual, 3rd edn. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tucker T,Howe HL,Weir HK (1999) Certification for population-based cancer registries. J Registry Manage February: 24-27.

  16. North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. NAACCR Certification Criteria and Standards for High Quality Data. Available from: http://www.naaccr.org, accessed May 2002.

  17. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health News Release (March 17,2000). Bethesda, MD: NCI and CDC collaborate on a comprehensive cancer surveillance and control system.

    Google Scholar 

  18. U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group (2002) U.S. Cancer Statistics: Incidence, 1999. Atlanta (GA): Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wu XC,Hotes JL,Fulton PJ, et al. (2002) Cancer in North America, 1995-1999. Volume One: Incidence. Springfield, IL: North American Association of Central Cancer Registries.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tucker TC,Howe HL (2001) Measuring the quality of central cancer registries: the NAACCR perspective. J Registry Manage 28: 41-4.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Howe HL (2001) Conclusions of the Workgroup for High Quality Criteria for Data Use: The NAACCR Narrative. Springfield (IL): North American Association of Central Cancer Registries.

    Google Scholar 

  22. SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program) (1998) The SEER Program Code Manual, 3rd edn. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute, NIH Publication No. 98-1999.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Percy C,Van Holten V,Muir C, (eds). (1990) International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 2nd edn. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  24. National Center for Health Statistics (1994) Vital Statistics of the United States, 1994. Vol. II, Part A: Mortality, 'Technical Appendix'. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rosenberg HM,Maurer JD,Sorlie PD, et al. (1999) Quality of Death Rates by Race and Hispanic Origin: A Summary of Current Research. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Poe GS,Powell-Griner E,McLaughlin JK,Placek PJ,Thompson GB,Robinson K (1993) Comparability of the Death Certificate and the 1986 National Mortality Followback Survey. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hogan H (1993) The 1990 post-enumeration survey: operations and results. J Am Stat Assoc 88: 1047-1060.

    Google Scholar 

  28. O'Malley C, Hu KU, West DW. North American Association of Central Cancer Registries: Race and Ethnicity Identifier Assessment Project. Available from: http://www.naaccr.org, accessed August 2002.

  29. National Cancer Institute. SEER*Stat 4.2, Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. Available from: http://www.seer.cancer.gov, accessed April 2002.

  30. Bureau of the Census. Population Estimates. Available from http:// eire.census.gov/popest/data/countiesl.php, accessed January 2002.

  31. Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York: John Wiley &; Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Anderson RN,Rosenberg HM (1998) Report of the Second Workshop on Age Adjustment. In: Vital and Health Statistics. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics, HHS Publication No. (PHS) Vol. 4, no. 30, pp. 99-1467.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Anderson RN,Rosenberg HM (1998) Age standardization of death rates: implementation of the year 2000 standard. In: National Vital Statistics Reports. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics. HHS Publication No. (PHS) Vol. 47, no. 3, pp 99-1120.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fay MP,Feuer EJ (1997) Confidence intervals for directly standardized rates: a method based on the gamma distribution. Stat Med 16: 791-801.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schenker N,Gentleman JF (2001) On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals. The Am Stat 55(3): 182-186.

    Google Scholar 

  36. US Department of Health and Human Services (1989) Reducing the Health Consequences of Smoking: 25 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Introducing the Third U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Article originally in Am J Prev Med 2001; 20(3S): 3-4. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http:// www.ahrq.gov/clinic/ajpmsuppl/berg.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lengerich EJ (ed). (Novembe 1999) Indicators for Chronic Disease Surveillance: Consensus of CSTE, ASTCDPD, and CDC. Atlanta, GA: Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Clegg LX,Midthune DN,Feuer EJ,Fay MP,Hankey BF (2000) Cancer incidence rates adjusted for reporting delay. In: Ries LAG,Eisner MP,Kosary CL, et al. (eds) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973-1997. Bethesda MD: National Cancer Institute, pp. 483-489.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ries LAG,Wingo PA,Miller DS, et al. (2000) The annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973-1997, with a special section on colorectal cancer. Cancer 88: 2398-2424.

    Google Scholar 

  41. American Association of Central Cancer Registries (April 1991) Cancer Incidence in the U.S.A., 1987. Sacramento, CA: American Association of Central Cancer Registries.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Coordinators(2000) State-specific prevalence of current cigarette smoking among adults and the proportion of adults who work in a smoke-free environments-United States, 1999. MMWR 49(43): 978-982.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, State Tobacco Activities Tracking and Evaluation (STATE) System (2002) Tobacco agriculture, 1997. Available from http://www2.cdc.gov/ nccdphp/osh/state/rpt_tob_display.asp?rpt_id=T1, accessed May 2002.

  44. Hankey BF,Ries LA,Edwards BK (1999) The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program: a national resource. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8: 1117-1121.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Frey CM,McMillen MM,Cowan CD,Horm JW,Kessler LG (1992) Representativeness of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program data: recent trends in cancer mortality rates. J Natl Cancer Inst 84: 872-877.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Nattinger AB,McAuliffe TL,Schapira MM (1997) Generalizability of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registry population: factors relevant to epidemiologic and health care research. J Clin Epidemiol 50: 939-945.

    Google Scholar 

  47. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1996) The effects of physical activity on health and disease-cancer. In: Physical Activity and Health: a Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, pp. 112-125.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Colditz GA,Cannuscio CC,Frazier AL (1997) Physical activity and reduced risk of colon cancer: implications for prevention. Cancer Causes Control 8: 649-667.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Winawer SJ,Zauber AG,Ho MN, et al. (1991) Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 325: 1593-1596.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Thomas DB (2002) Alternatives to a national system of population-based state cancer registries. Am J Public Health 92: 1064-1066.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Working together for comprehensive cancer control: an institute for state leaders. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/cancer, accessed August 2002.

  52. National Dialogue on Cancer, NDC Teams, State Cancer Plans. Available from: http://www.ndoc.org, accessed August 2002.

  53. Edwards BK,Howe HL,Ries LAG, et al. (2002) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973-1999, featuring implications of age and aging on U.S. cancer burden. Cancer 94: 2766-2792.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

    Phyllis A. Wingo, Patricia M. Jamison, Hannah K. Weir, Paul M. Gargiullo, Mary Hutton, Nancy C. Lee & H. Irene Hall

  2. Division of Cancer Control and Population Science, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

    Robert A. Hiatt

Authors
  1. Phyllis A. Wingo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patricia M. Jamison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert A. Hiatt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hannah K. Weir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Paul M. Gargiullo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mary Hutton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Nancy C. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. H. Irene Hall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phyllis A. Wingo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wingo, P.A., Jamison, P.M., Hiatt, R.A. et al. Building the infrastructure for nationwide cancer surveillance and control – a comparison between The National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (United States). Cancer Causes Control 14, 175–193 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023002322935

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023002322935

Search

Navigation