Skip to main content
Log in

Gastric Cancer: Tumor Markers as Predictive Factors for Preoperative Staging

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

CEA, CA 19-9, and CA 72-4 are tumor markers commonly used for gastric neoplasms. The clinical importance of the preoperative serum levels of these tumor markers in gastric cancer (GC) is not well known. Even less is known about the predictive value of the preoperative serum levels of the β-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCGβ).

Aims and Methods

We designed a prospective study to evaluate the significance of the preoperative values of these tumor markers in GC. The serum levels that we considered as positive are as follows: CA 72-4, >4 U/ml; CEA, >5 ng/ml; CA 19-9, >37 U/ml; hCGβ-free subunit, <5 mUI/ml. These levels were correlated by pathological stage, lymph node status, and histology.

Results

We studied 66 (42 male and 24 female) patients prospectively. Twenty-seven patients had stage I and stage II GCs, while 39 patients had stage III and stage IV GCs. Two patients tested positive for hCGβ. The preoperative positivity rates of CA 72-4 in patients at the early stages (stages I and II) and in patients with advanced disease (stages III and IV) were 0 and 28 patients, respectively. The preoperative positivity rates of CEA/CA 19.9 were 0/5 and 7/12 patients in early stages and advanced disease, respectively. The serum levels of these markers were not correlated with the histological type or tumoral grade of GC.

Conclusion

The preoperative serum level of CA 72-4 has the best predictive value in indicating advanced disease in patients diagnosed with GC. A combination of these four markers is better in predicting this situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Thomas A, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:23–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ries LA, Kosary CL, Hankey BF. SEER cancer statistics review 1973–1995. Bethesda: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 1998.

  3. Allum WH, Powell DJ, McConkey CC, Fielding JW. Gastric cancer: a 25-year review. Br J Surg. 1989;76:535–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wanebo HJ, Kennedy BJ, Chmiel J, Steele Jr G, Winchester D, Osteen R. Cancer of the stomach. A patient care study by the American College of Surgeons. Ann Surg. 1993;218:583–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Akoh JA, Macintyre IM. Improving survival in gastric cancer: review of 5-year survival rates in English language publications from 1970. Br J Surg. 1992;79:293–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Catalano V, Labianca R, Beretta GD, Gatta G, De Braud F, Van Cutsem E. Gastric cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2009;71:127–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Takahashi Y, Takeuchi T, Sakamoto J, Touge T, Masayoshi M, Ohkura H, et al. The usefulness of CEA and/or CA 19.9 in monitoring for recurrence in gastric cancer patients: a prospective clinical study. Gastric Cancer. 2003;6:142–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakane Y, Okamura S, Akehira K, Boku T, Okusa T, Tanaka K, et al. Correlation of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels and prognosis of gastric cancer patients. Cancer. 1994;73:2703–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tachibana M, Takemoto Y, Nakashima Y, Kinugasa S, Coto T, Dhar DK, et al. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen as a prognostic factor in resectable gastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:64–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sakamoto J, Nakazato H, Teramukai S, Ohashi Y, Takahashi Y, Mai M, et al. Association between preoperative plasma CEA levels and the prognosis of gastric cancer following curative resection. Tumor Marker Committee, Japanese Foundation for Multidisciplinary Treatment of Cancer, Tokyo, Japan. Surg Oncol. 1996;5:133–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Maehara Y, Kusumoto T, Takahashi I, Kakeji Y, Baba H, Akazawa K, et al. Predictive value of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels for the prognosis of patients with well-differentiated gastric cancer. A multivariate analysis. Oncology. 1994;51:234–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rakic S, Jagodic M, Adanja-Grujic G. Levels of tumor markers and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in intestinal and diffuse gastric cancer. Arch Gastroenterol. 1997;16(1):5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ychou M, Duffour J, Kramar A, Gourgou S, Grenier J. Clinical significance and prognostic value of CA 72.4 compared with CEA and CA 19.9 in patients with gastric cancer. Dis Markers. 2000;16(3–4):105–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gaspar MJ, Arribas I, Coca MC, Díez-Alonso M. Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA 19.9 and CA 72.4 in gastric carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2001;22(5):318–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lai IR, Lee WJ, Huang MT, Lin HH. Comparison of serum CA 72.4, CEA, TPA, CA 19.9 and CA 125 levels in gastric cancer patients and correlation with recurrence. Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;49(46):1157–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Marrelli D, Roviello F, De Stefano A, Farnetani M, Garosi L, Messano A, et al. Prognostic significance of CEA, CA 19.9 and CA 72.4 preoperative serum levels in gastric carcinoma. Oncology. 1999;57(1):55–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Louhimo J, Kokkola A, Alfthan H, Stenman U, Haglund C. Preoperative hCGbeta and CA 72.4 are prognostic factors in gastric cancer. Int J Cancer. 2004;111:939–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Webb A, Scott-Mackie P, Cunningham D, Norman A, Andreyev J, O'Brien M, et al. The prognostic value of serum and immunohistochemical tumour markers in advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1996;32A:63–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. International Union Against Cancer. In: Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch, editors. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 6th ed. New York: Wiley-Liss Book; 2002.

  20. Yano T, Nakatani K, Watanabe A, Sawada H, Okumura T, Yamada Y, et al. Utility of measurement of tumor markers for preoperative staging of gastric cancer. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1993;94(9):977–87.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wobbes T, Thomas CMG, Segers MFG. Evaluation of seven tumour markers (CA 50, CA 19.9, CA 19.9 TruQuant, CA 72.4, CA 195, carcinoembryonic antigen, and tissue polypeptide antigen) in the pretreatment sera of patients with gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 1992;69:2036–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Guadagni F, Roselli M, Cosimelli M, Ferroni P, Spila A, Casaldi V, et al. Correlation between positive CA 72.4 serum levels and lymph node involvement in patients with gastric carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 1993;13(6B):2409–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Duraker N, Çelik AN. The prognostic significance of preoperative serum CA 19.9 in patients with resectable gastric carcinoma: comparison with CEA. J Surg Oncol. 2001;76:266–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Marrelli D, Roviello F, De Stefano A, Farnetani M, Garosi L, Messano A, et al. Prognostic significance of CEA, CA 19.9 and CA 72.4 preoperative serum levels in gastric carcinoma. Oncology. 1999;57(1):55–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rakic S, Jagodic M, Adanja-Grujic G. Levels of tumor markers and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in intestinal and diffuse gastric cancer. Arch Gastroenterol. 1997;16(1):5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kodera Y, Yamamura Y, Torii A, Uesaka K, Hirai T, Yasui K, et al. The prognostic value of preoperative serum levels of CEA and CA 19.9 in patients with gastric cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;91(1):49–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Goral V, Yesilbagdan H, Kaplan A, Sit D, Celik M. The role of CA 72.4, a new tumor marker in gastric cancer. Turk Klin Tip Bilim Derg. 2006;26(1):3–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gaspar MJ, Arribas I, Coca MC, Díez-Alonso M. Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen, CA 19.9 and CA 72.4 in gastric carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2001;22(5):318–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tachibana M, Takemoto Y, Nakashima Y. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen as a prognostic factor in resectable gastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:64–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Nakane Y, Okamura S, Akehira K, Boku T, Okusa T, Tanaka K, et al. Correlation of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels and prognosis of gastric cancer patients. Cancer. 1994;73(11):2703–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Louhimo J, Kokkola A, Alfthan H, Stenman U, Haglund C. Preoperative hCGbeta and CA 72.4 are prognostic factors in gastric cancer. Int J Cancer. 2004;111:939–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all members of the General Surgery and Digestive Services of the Clinical University Hospital of Valladolid and the Medina del Campo Hospital for their contribution to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esther Uña Cidón.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cidón, E.U., Bustamante, R. Gastric Cancer: Tumor Markers as Predictive Factors for Preoperative Staging. J Gastrointest Canc 42, 127–130 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-010-9161-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-010-9161-0

Keywords

Navigation