Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Psychometric assessment and application of a questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with information on cancer treatment

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Pharmacy World and Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: Pharmaceutical care follows a needs-based approach. Cancer patients form a group with particular needs. Information about cancer treatment plays an important role in terms of coping strategies, initiation of self-care behaviour, and quality of life. In order to develop pharmaceutical care strategies for cancer patients, it is important to assess patients’ information needs. This survey aims at providing a suitable instrument to measure patient satisfaction with information on cancer treatment and to reveal the present situation in Germany.

Methods: Since there was no suitable German measure available, the Canadian ‘Patient Satisfaction with Cancer Treatment Education (PS-CaTE) questionnaire’ was translated into German and its test quality criteria were examined. Selected socio-demographic variables were added to the original version of the questionnaire to facilitate subgroup analysis. A pre-test was performed to assess the reliability of the adapted instrument.The questionnaire was distributed among patients of cooperating hospitals, oncology practices, and self-aid groups over Germany.

Results: The pre-test established a good reliability of the instrument. In the main survey, overall satisfaction, on a 5- point Likert scale, showed a median score of 3.5, where 5 represented the highest degree of satisfaction. A subscale analysis revealed that satisfaction with information provided on adverse events and complementary treatment options was lower compared to the information provided on cancer treatment. A stepwise multiple-regression analysis identified three significant predictors of satisfaction: a) diagnosis of a mammary carcinoma; b) recent diagnosis; and c) treatment by a primary-care oncologist. Patients with a mammary carcinoma and patients treated by a primary-care oncologist were less satisfied, and patients with a recent diagnosis were more satisfied compared to other patients. In comparison to other information sources, pharmacists still seem to play a minor role as a source of information for patients.

Conclusions: The version of the questionnaire with a total of 14 items seems to be suitable for measuring patient satisfaction with information. Additional research is needed to further verify the validity of the instrument. The questionnaire may help pharmaceutical-care providers to develop needs-based information strategies. The assessment of patient satisfaction can contribute to the outcome evaluation of pharmaceutical care. The fact that pharmacists are not yet being recognised by most patients as a source of information should support an intensified and more active offer of care by the pharmacist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CD Hepler LM. Strand (1990) ArticleTitleOpportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care Am J Hosp Pharm 47 533–43 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BC1MngtlU%3D Occurrence Handle2316538

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. International Conference on Health Promotion. World Health Organization, 1986. www. who.dk/aboutwho/policy/20010827_2

  3. BR Cassileth RV Zupkis K Sutton-Smith V. March (1980) ArticleTitleInformation and participation preferences among cancer patients Ann Intern Med 92 832–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi%2BB3MfkvF0%3D Occurrence Handle7387025

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. B. Molen Particlevan der (1999) ArticleTitleRelating information needs to the cancer experience:1Information as a key coping strategy Eur J Cancer Care 8 238–44 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2354.1999.00176.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. MJ. Dodd (1983) ArticleTitleSelf-care for side effects in cancer chemotherapy: an assessment of nursing interventions-Part II Cancer Nurs 6 63–7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiyC38fpvVI%3D Occurrence Handle6549932

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. MA Annunziata S Foladore MD Magri D Crivellari A Feltrin E. Bidoli et al. (1998) ArticleTitleDoes the information level of cancer patients correlate with quality of life? A prospective study Tumori 84 619–623 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7nvVOnuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10080664

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. KJ Pohar SCM. Taylor (2000) ArticleTitleAmbulatory Patient Satisfaction with Cancer Treatment Education J Oncol Pharm Pract 6 31

    Google Scholar 

  8. NK Aaronson S Ahmedzai B Bergman M Bullinger A Cull NJ. Duez et al. (1993) ArticleTitleThe European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology J Natl Cancer Inst 85 365–76 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC28vivVc%3D Occurrence Handle8433390

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. DL Streiner GR. Norman (2000) Health measurement scales- a practical guide to their development and use NumberInSeries2 Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. L Crocker J. Algina (1986) Introduction to classical and modern test theory Holt, Rinehart and Winston New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. FM Lord MP.MA Novick (1968) Statistical theories of mental test scores. Addison-Wesley Reading

    Google Scholar 

  12. RF. Devellis (1991) Scale development Theory and applications. Sage Publications Newbury Park CA

    Google Scholar 

  13. FL Pimentel JS Ferreira RM Vila NF Mesquita JP. Maia-Goncalves (1999) ArticleTitleQuantity and quality of information desired by Portuguese cancer patients Support Care Cancer 7 407–12 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s005200050301 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FgvFOkug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10541983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. V Bonnet C Couvreur P Demachy F Kimmel H Milan D Noel et al. (2000) ArticleTitleEvaluating radiotherapy patients’ need for information: a study using a patient information booklet Cancer Radiother 4 294–307 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvksFenug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10994394

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. S Hope AS Williams D. Lunn (2000) ArticleTitleInformation provision to cancer patients: a practical example of identifying the need for changes in practice from the Dorset Cancer Centre Eur J Cancer Care 9 238–42 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2354.2000.00234.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FpvFeltQ%3D%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. KA Luker K Beaver SJ Leinster RG. Owens (1996) ArticleTitleInformation needs and sources of information for women with breast cancer: a follow- up study J Adv Nurs 23 487–95 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.13617.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB3sjitVY%3D Occurrence Handle8655823

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. DH Gustafson JO Taylor S Thompson P. Chesney (1993) ArticleTitleAssessing the needs of breast cancer patients and their families Qual Manag Health Care 2 6–17 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuC3MrksVA%3D Occurrence Handle10131022

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. LD Ried F Wang H Young R. Awiphan (1999) ArticleTitlePatients’ satisfaction and their perception of the pharmacist J Am Pharm Assoc 39 835–42 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FnslCmsg%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Janel G, Sing D, Grochocka A, Pfaff AB. Probleme im Versorgungsprozess aus der Sicht von Brustkrebspatientinnen und Ärzten. [in German] Forum 2000; 15(4): 24–7.

  20. C Häggmark L Bohman K Ilmoni-Brandt I Näslund PO Sjödèn B. Nilsson (2001) ArticleTitleEffects of information supply on satisfaction with information and quality of life on cancer patients receiving curative radiation therapy Patient Educ Couns 45 173–9 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0738-3991(01)00116-1 Occurrence Handle11722852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, An der Immenburg 4, 53121, Bonn, Germany

    Andrea Liekweg, Meike Eckhardt & Ulrich Jaehde

  2. BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Ave., Vancouver, BC, Canada, V5Z 4E6

    Suzanne C. Malfair Taylor

  3. Department of Psychology III, University of Mannheim, 68131, Mannheim, Germany

    Edgar Erdfelder

Authors
  1. Andrea Liekweg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Meike Eckhardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Suzanne C. Malfair Taylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Edgar Erdfelder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ulrich Jaehde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich Jaehde.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liekweg, A., Eckhardt, M., Taylor, S.C.M. et al. Psychometric assessment and application of a questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with information on cancer treatment. Pharm World Sci 27, 96–103 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-004-5337-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-004-5337-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation