Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ocular manipulation reduces both ipsilateral and contralateral electroretinograms

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the electroretinogram (ERG) changes in eyes manipulated in the course of local ablative therapy (transpupil thermotherapy (TTT), cryotherapy or both) or scleral depression and in un-manipulated fellow, healthy eyes.

Methods

This prospective observational report summarizes 73 ERG studies in 42 patients with retinoblastoma; a study consisted of ERGs of one or both eyes (if present) followed by ocular manipulation (scleral depression, cryotherapy, transpupillary thermotherapy, pressure applied to orbital implant in an anophthalmic socket, or a 5- or 10-min delay without mechanical manipulation) followed by a repeat of the ERGs. Each patient was studied with only a single manipulation modality on any given date: 23 patients were studied only once, and 19 patients were included in more than one study occasion.

Results

Following local ablative treatment of patients with unilateral retinoblastoma, the photopic response decreased significantly in both the treated eye and the untouched fellow, healthy eye. Following scleral depression of the diseased eye, the photopic response immediately decreased in the diseased eye by a mean of 16 μV (21 %, p = .006) and, in the fellow, healthy eye by 40 μV (23 %, p = .0005). Following scleral depression of the fellow, healthy eye, the photopic response immediately decreased by a mean of 11 μV (4 %, p = .37) in the fellow, healthy eye, and by 16 μV (28 %, p = .01) in the diseased eye.

Conclusions

Following physical ocular manipulation, the amplitude of the photopic response decreased in the manipulated, but also the untouched healthy, fellow eyes. These findings may account for some of the variation in clinical ERG recordings, particularly that observed following ocular manipulation by TTT, laser or even scleral depression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Falsini B, Focosi F, Molle F, Manganelli C, Iarossi G, Fadda A, Dorin G, Mainster MA (2003) Monitoring retinal function during transpupillary thermotherapy for occult choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:2133–2140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ishikawa K, Nishihara H, Ozawa S, Piao CH, Ito Y, Kondo M, Terasaki H (2009) Focal macular electroretinograms after photodynamic therapy combined with posterior juxtascleral triamcinolone acetonide. Retina 29:803–810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Prager TP, Mincher CA, Marshak DW, Garcia AC (1992) The effect of laser on the pattern electroretinogram: a primate model. Clin Vision Sci 7:349–356

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ciavarella P, Moretti G, Falsini B, Porciatti V (1997) The pattern electroretinogram (PERG) after laser treatment of the peripheral or central retina. Curr Eye Res 16:111–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lövestam-Adrian M, Andréasson S, Ponjavic V (2004) Macular function assessed with mfERG before and after panretinal photocoagulation in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Doc Ophthalmol 109:115–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lai TY, Chan WM, Lam DS (2004) Transient reduction in retinal function revealed by multifocal electroretinogram after photodynamic therapy. Am J Ophthalmol 137:826–833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Greenstein VC, Chen H, Hood DC, Holopigian K, Seiple W, Carr RE (2000) Retinal function in diabetic macular edema after focal laser photocoagulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:3655–3664

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Imai M, Iijima H (1995) Effects of panretinal photocoagulation on photopic ERG in normal rabbit eyes. Jpn J Ophthalmol 39:120–123

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wallenten KG, Malmsjo M, Andreasson S, Wackenfors A, Johansson K, Ghosh F (2007) Retinal function and PKC alpha expression after focal laser photocoagulation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245:1815–1834

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brodie SE, Pierre Gobin Y, Dunkel IJ, Kim JW, Abramson DH (2009) Persistence of retinal function after selective ophthalmic artery chemotherapy infusion for retinoblastoma. Doc Ophthalmol 119:13–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nair G, Kim M, Nagaoka T, Olson DE, Thule PM, Pardue MT, Duong TQ (2011) Effects of common anesthetics on eye movement and electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 122:163–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mojumder DK, Wensel TG (2010) Topical mydriatics affect light-evoked retinal responses in anesthetized mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:567–576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Li RS, Tay DK, Chan HH, So KF (2006) Changes of retinal functions following the induction of ocular hypertension in rats using argon laser photocoagulation. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 34:575–583

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sandalon S, Ofri R (2009) The effect of topical anesthesia on the rat electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 118:101–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Andréasson S, Tornqvist K, Ehinger B (1993) Full-field electroretinograms during general anesthesia in normal children compared to examination with topical anesthesia. Acta Ophthalmol 71:491–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Iohom G, Whyte A, Flynn T, O’Connor G, Shorten G (2004) Postoperative changes in the full-field electroretinogram following sevoflurane anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 21:272–278

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Iohom G, Gardiner C, Whyte A, O’Connor G, Shorten G (2004) Abnormalities of contrast sensitivity and electroretinogram following sevoflurane anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 21:646–652

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahmed B, el-Wafai S, Bana L (1989) Effect of elevation of body temperature on the electroretinogram of the rat. Int J Hyperthermia 5:675–682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kong J, Gouras P (2003) The effect of body temperature on the murine electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 106:239–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tazawa Y, Seaman AJ (1972) The electroretinogram of the living extracorporeal bovine eye. The influence of anoxia and hypothermia. Invest Ophthalmol 11:691–698

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by The Fund for Ophthalmic Knowledge, The New York Community Trust and Research to Prevent Blindness.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott E. Brodie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Francis, J.H., Abramson, D.H., Marr, B.P. et al. Ocular manipulation reduces both ipsilateral and contralateral electroretinograms. Doc Ophthalmol 127, 113–122 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-013-9391-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-013-9391-0

Keywords

Navigation