Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening Rates Vary by Etiology of Cirrhosis and Involvement of Gastrointestinal Sub-specialists

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Regular screening of cirrhotic patients for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been suboptimal, but there is little data regarding specific risk factors for reduced screening.

Methods

From 1996 to 2010, patients with cirrhosis were retrospectively identified from outpatient gastroenterology and primary care practices. Data was obtained from the diagnosis of cirrhosis until the time of elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) or lesion suspicious for HCC, death, liver transplantation, or end of the data collection period. Recommended screening was defined as abdominal imaging (ultrasound, contrast-enhanced CT, or MRI) with or without serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) at least once every 12 months based on professional guidelines.

Results

One hundred fifty-six patients with cirrhosis were identified. The etiologies of cirrhosis were viral hepatitis (n = 65), alcohol (n = 40), non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (n = 27), and non-viral, non-alcoholic, non-NASH cirrhosis (n = 24). Of the 156 patients, 51% received recommended screening for HCC. Patients with NASH cirrhosis received recommended screening significantly less (p = 0.016) than cirrhotics with viral hepatitis, alcoholic cirrhosis, or non-viral, non-alcoholic, non-NASH cirrhosis and were less likely to receive gastroenterology referral (p < 0.001). Additionally, 20 patients were diagnosed with cirrhosis incidentally during a surgical procedure. These patients were significantly less likely to receive recommended HCC screening than those diagnosed non-surgically (10.0 vs. 56.6%; p < 0.001). Screening was significantly more likely to occur in patients seen regularly by a gastrointestinal subspecialist (66.7 vs. 22.8%; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Patients with NASH cirrhosis and incidentally discovered cirrhosis have low rates of HCC screening and are referred less often to gastroenterologists. These data suggest a need for increased education about NASH cirrhosis and better systems of communication among general practitioners, surgeons, and gastroenterologists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

HBV:

Hepatitis B virus

HCV:

Hepatitis C virus

NAFLD:

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

NASH:

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

References

  1. Parkin DM. Global cancer statistics in the year 2000. Lancet Oncol. 2001;2:533–543.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sangiovanni A, Del Ninno E, Fasani P, et al. Increased survival of cirrhotic patients with a hepatocellular carcinoma detected during surveillance. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:1005–1014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Degos F, Christidis C, Ganne-Carrie N, et al. Hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis: time to occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma and death. Gut. 2000;47:131–136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Benvegnu L, Gios M, Boccato S, Alberti A. Natural history of compensated viral cirrhosis: a prospective study on the incidence and hierarchy of major complications. Gut. 2004;53:744–749.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. El Serag HB, Davila JA, Peteren NJ, McGlynn KA. The continuing increase in the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States: an update. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:817–823.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanyal A, Poklepovic A, Moyneur E, Barghout V. Population-based risk factors and resource utilization for HCC: US perspective. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26:2183–2191.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu JH, Chen PW, Asch SM, Busutill RW, Ko CY. Surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma: does it improve survival? Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11:298–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bruix J, Llovet JM. Prognostic prediction and treatment strategy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2002;35:519–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang BH, Yang BH, Tang Zy. Randomized controlled trial of screening for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2004;130:417–422.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bruix J, Sherman M, Practice Guidelines Committee, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005;42:1208–1236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bruix J, Sherman M, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology. 2011;53:1020–1022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Davila JA, Weston A, Smalley W, El-Serag HB. Utilization of screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;41:777–782.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leykum LK, El-Serag HB, Cornell J, Papadopoulos KP. Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma among veterans with hepatitis C on disease stage, treatment received, and survival. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:508–512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Davila JA, Morgan RO, Richardson PA, Du XL, McGlynn KA, El-Serag HB. Use of surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with cirrhosis in the United States. Hepatology. 2010;52:132–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marrero JA, Fontana RJ, Su GL, Conjeevaram HS, Emick DM, Lok AS. NAFLD may be a common underlying liver disease in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. Hepatology. 2002;36:1349–1354.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ascha MS, Hanouneh IA, Lopez R, Tamimi TA, Feldstein AF, Zein NN. The incidence and risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2010;51:1972–1978.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tokushige K, Hashimoto E, Yatsuji, et al. Prospective study of hepatocellular carcinoma in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in comparison with hepatocellular carcinoma caused by chronic hepatitis C. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:960–967.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mandel JS, Church TR, Bond JH, et al. The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1603–1607.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Costantino JP, Gail MH, Pee D, et al. Validation studies for models projecting the risk of invasive and total breast cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:1541–1548.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jenkins TC, Price CS, Sabel AL, Mehler PS, Burman WJ. Impact of routine infectious diseases service consultation on the evaluation, management, and outcomes of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:1000–1008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Honda H, Krauss MJ, Jones JC, Olsen MA, Warren DK. The value of infectious diseases consultation in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Am J Med. 2010;123:631–637.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Leffler DA, Neeman N, Rabb JM, et al. An alerting system improves adherence to follow-up recommendations from colonoscopy examinations. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:116–1173.e3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Feldstein AC, Perrin N, Rosales AG, et al. Effect of a multimodal reminder program on repeat mammogram screening. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37:94–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Brien PE. Bariatric surgery: mechanisms, indications and outcomes. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:1358–1365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pannain S, Mokhlesi B. Bariatric surgery and its impact on sleep architecture, sleep-disordered breathing, and metabolism. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;24:745–761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Trevisani F, D’Intino PE, Morselli-Labate AM, et al. Serum alpha-fetoprotein for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: influence of HBsAg and anti-HCV status. J Hepatol. 2001;34:570–575.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Kathleen Finn and Dr. Daniel Hunt for their critical reading of this manuscript and their suggestions. Part of this work was presented at a poster session at the 61st Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases; 2010 November 2; Boston, MA. Raymond T. Chung was supported by NIH DK078772.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raymond T. Chung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patwardhan, V., Paul, S., Corey, K.E. et al. Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening Rates Vary by Etiology of Cirrhosis and Involvement of Gastrointestinal Sub-specialists. Dig Dis Sci 56, 3316–3322 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-011-1836-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-011-1836-2

Keywords

Navigation