Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations in an urban population of Black women

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information on the prevalence of deleterious BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutations in clinic-based populations of Black women is limited. In order to address this gap, we performed a retrospective study to determine the prevalence of deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations, predictors of having a mutation, and acceptance of risk-reducing surgeries in Black women. In an urban unselected clinic-based population, we evaluated 211 self-identified Black women who underwent genetic counseling for hereditary breast–ovarian cancer syndrome. BRCA1/2 mutations were identified in 13.4 % of the participants who received genetic testing. Younger age at diagnosis, higher BRCAPRO score, significant family history, and diagnosis of triple-negative breast cancer were associated with identification of a BRCA1/2 mutation. Of the affected patients found to have a deleterious mutation, almost half underwent prophylactic measures. In our study population, 1 in 7 Black women who underwent genetic testing harbored a deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation independent of age at diagnosis or family history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD (2007) Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer Registry. Cancer 109(9):1721–1728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kwan ML, Kushi LH, Weltzien E et al (2009) Epidemiology of breast cancer subtypes in two prospective cohort studies of breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res 11(3):R31. doi:10.1186/bcr2261

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Peshkin BN, Alabek ML, Isaacs C (2010) BRCA1/2 mutations and triple negative breast cancers. Breast Dis 32(1–2):25–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Young SR, Pilarski RT, Donenberg T et al (2009) The prevalence of BRCA1 mutations among young women with triple-negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer 9:86. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-9-86

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Atchley DP, Albarracin CT, Lopez A et al (2008) Clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients with BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:4282–4288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Couch FJ, Hart SN, Sharma P et al (2015) Inherited mutations in 17 breast cancer susceptibility genes among a large triple-negative breast cancer cohort unselected for family history of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 33:304–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Althuis MD, Brogan DD, Coates RJ (2003) Breast cancers among very young premenopausal women (United States). Cancer Causes Control 14(2):151–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pal T, Bonner D, Kim J et al (2013) Early onset Breast Cancer in a Registry-based sample of African-American women: BRCA mutation prevalence, and other personal and system-level clinical characteristics. Breast J 19(2):189–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. John EM, Miron A, Gong G et al (2007) Prevalence of pathogenic BRCA1 mutation carriers in 5 U.S. racial/ethnic groups. JAMA 298(24):2869–2876

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Malone KE, Daling JR, Doody DR et al (2006) Prevalence and predictors of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based study of breast cancer in white and black American women ages 35 to 64 years. Cancer Res 66(16):8297–8308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Haffty BG, Silber A, Matloff E et al (2006) Racial differences in the incidence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a cohort of early onset breast cancer patients: African American compared to white women. J Med Genet 43:133–137

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nanda R, Schumm LP, Cummings S et al (2005) Genetic testing in an ethnically diverse cohort of high-risk women: a comparative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in American families of European and African ancestry. JAMA 294(15):1925–1933

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hall MJ, Reid JE, Burbidge LA et al (2009) BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women of different ethnicities undergoing testing for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. Cancer 115(10):2222–2233

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Judkins T, Rosenthal E, Arnell C et al (2012) Clinical significance of large rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cancer 118(21):5210–5216

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Greenup R, Buchanan A, Lorizio W et al (2013) Prevalence of BRCA mutations among women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in a genetic counseling cohort. Ann Surg Oncol 20(10):3254–3258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Inc. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®). Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian. Version 2.2015. www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/genetics_screening.pdf, Accessed 8 July 2015

  17. Stuckey A, Febbraro T, Laprise J, et al (2014) Adherence patterns to National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines for referral of women with breast cancer to genetics professionals. Am J Clin Oncol 2014 [Epub ahead of print]

  18. Pal T, Bonner D, Cragun D et al (2014) BRCA sequencing and large rearrangement testing in young Black women with breast cancer. J Commun Genet 5(2):157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Laurent-Puig P, Essioux L et al (1997) BRCA1 sequence variations in 160 individuals referred to a breast/ovarian family cancer clinic. Institut Curie Breast Cancer Group. Am J Hum Genet 60(5):1021–1030

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shatavi SV, Dohany, L, Chisti MM, et al. (2013) Unique genetic characteristics of BRCA mutation carriers in a cohort of Arab American women. J Clin Oncol 31, (suppl;aabstr 1541)

  21. Eggington JM, Burbidge LA, Roa B, et al (2012) Current variant of uncertain significance rates in BRCA1/2 and Lynch syndrome testing (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, EPCAM) American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics annual meeting, Charlotte

  22. Ricker CN, Sturgeon JD, Gruber SB (2014) Mutation and uncertain variant findings in ethnic minority patients undergoing multi-gene panel testing for cancer risk assessment at a safety-net public hospital (Abstract 3428S). Presented at the 64th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Human Genetics, on October 2014 in San Diego

  23. LaDuca H, Stuenkel AJ, Dolinsky JS et al (2014) Utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2,000 patients. Gene Med 16(11):830–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tung N, Battelli C, Allen B et al (2015) Frequency of mutations in individuals with breast cancer referred for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing using next-generation sequencing with a 25-gene panel. Cancer 121(1):25–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schwartz MD, Isaacs C, Graves KD et al (2012) Long-term outcome of BRCA1/BRCA2 testing: risk reduction and surveillance. Cancer 118(2):510–517

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bradbury AR, Comfort NI, Dignam JJ et al (2008) Uptake and timing of bilateral prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Genet Med 10:161–166

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kinney AY, Simonsen SE, Baty BJ (2006) Risk reduction behaviors and provider communication following genetic counseling and BRCA1 mutation testing in an African American kindred. J Genet Couns 15:293–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Salant T, Ganschow PS, Olopade OI (2006) ”Why take it if you don’t have anything?” breast cancer risk perceptions and prevention choices at a public hospital. J Gen Intern Med 21:779–785

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Thompson HS, Sussner K, Schwartz MD et al (2012) Receipt of genetic counseling recommendations among black women at high risk for BRCA mutations. Genet Test Molec Biomark 16(11):1257–1262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Halbert CH, Brewster K, Collier A et al (2005) Recruiting African American women to participate in hereditary breast cancer research. J Clin Oncol 23(31):7967–7973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Glenn BA, Chawla N, Bastani R (2012) Barriers to genetic testing for breast cancer risk among ethnic minority women: an exploratory study. Ethn Dis 22(3):267–273

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Susswein LR, Skrzynia C, Lange LA et al (2008) Increased uptake of BRCA1/2 genetic testing among African American women with a recent diagnosis of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:32–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sussner KM, Edwards TA, Thompson HS et al (2011) Ethnic, racial and cultural identity and perceived benefits and barriers related to genetic testing for breast cancer among at-risk women of African descent in New York City. Public Health Genomics 14(6):356–370

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Armstrong K, Putt M, Halbert CH et al (2012) The influence of health care policies and health care system disrupt on willingness to undergo genetic testing. Med Care 50(5):381–387

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Affordable Care Act Implementation FAQs–Set 12. http://www.cms.gov/CCIIO/Resources/Fact-Sheets-and-FAQs/aca_implementation_faqs12.html. Accessed on April 15 2015

  36. Churpek JE, Walsh T, Zheng Y et al (2015) Inherited predispostion to breast cancer among African American women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 149(1):31–39

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Heikkinen T, Kärkkäinen H, Aaltonen K et al (2009) The breast cancer susceptibility mutation PALB2 1592delT is associated with an aggressive tumor phenotype. Clin Cancer Res 15(9):3214–3222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Antoniou AC, Casadei S, Heikkinen T et al (2014) Breast-cancer risk in families with mutations in PALB2. N Engl J Med 371(6):497–506

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the following genetic counselors who saw the patients who participated in this study (besides TD and BNP): Rachel Nusbaum MS, CGC, Gillian Hooker PhD, MS, and Morgan Similuk, MGC, CGC. We thank the endowed Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, and Genentech for the grant received for genetic counseling and testing.

Funding

This study was supported by the Familial Cancer Registry and Nontherapeutic Subject Registry Shared Resource at Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, and was partially supported by the National Institutes of Health Grant P30-CA-51008. Study data were collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at Georgetown University Medical Center. Ms. Peshkin and Dr. Isaacs received support from the endowed Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filipa Lynce.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lynce, F., Smith, K.L., Stein, J. et al. Deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations in an urban population of Black women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 153, 201–209 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3527-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3527-8

Keywords

Navigation