Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

SERPINA6, BEX1, AGTR1, SLC26A3, and LAPTM4B are markers of resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer

  • Clinical trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Response rates to chemotherapy remain highly variable in breast cancer patients. We set out to identify genes associated with chemotherapy resistance. We analyzed what is currently the largest single-institute set of gene expression profiles derived from breast cancers prior to a single neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen (dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide). We collected, gene expression-profiled, and analyzed 178 HER2-negative breast tumor biopsies (“NKI dataset”). We employed a recently developed approach for detecting imbalanced differential signal (DIDS) to identify markers of resistance to treatment. In contrast to traditional methods, DIDS is able to identify markers that show aberrant expression in only a small subgroup of the non-responder samples. We found a number of markers of resistance to anthracycline-based chemotherapy. We validated our findings in three external datasets, totaling 456 HER2-negative samples. Since these external sets included patients who received differing treatment regimens, the validated markers represent markers of general chemotherapy resistance. There was a highly significant overlap in the markers identified in the NKI dataset and the other three datasets. Five resistance markers, SERPINA6, BEX1, AGTR1, SLC26A3, and LAPTM4B, were identified in three of the four datasets (p value overlap < 1 × 10−6). These five genes identified resistant tumors that could not have been identified by merely taking ER status or proliferation into account. The identification of these genes might lead to a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in (clinically) observed chemotherapy resistance and could possibly assist in the recognition of breast cancers in which chemotherapy does not contribute to response or survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ateeq B, Tomlins SA, Chinnaiyan AM (2009) AGTR1 as a therapeutic target in ER-positive and ERBB2-negative breast cancer cases. Cell Cycle 8(23):3794–3795

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Borst P (2012) Cancer drug pan-resistance: pumps, cancer stem cells, quiescence, epithelial to mesenchymal transition, blocked cell death pathways, persisters or what? Open Biol 2(5):120066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Breitling R, Armengaud P, Amtmann A, Herzyk P (2004) Rank products: a simple, yet powerful, new method to detect differentially regulated genes in replicated microarray experiments. FEBS Lett 573(1–3):83–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Denkert C, Loibl S, Noske A, Roller M, Muller BM, Komor M, Budczies J, Darb-Esfahani S, Kronenwett R, Hanusch C, von Törne C, Weichert W, Engels K, Solbach C, Schrader I, Dietel M, von Minckwitz G (2010) Tumor-associated lymphocytes as an independent predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(1):105–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. de Ronde JJ, Rigaill G, Rottenberg S, Rodenhuis S, Wessels LFA Identifying subgroup markers in heterogeneous populations. Nucleic Acids Res (submitted)

  6. Ghazoui Z, Buffa FM, Dunbier AK, Anderson H, Dexter T, Detre S, Salter J, Smith IE, Harris AL, Dowsett M (2011) Close and stable relationship between proliferation and a hypoxia metagene in aromatase inhibitor-treated ER-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 17(9):3005–3012

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gillet JP, Calcagno AM, Varma S, Marino M, Green LJ, Vora MI, Patel C, Orina JN, Eliseeva TA, Singal V, Padmanabhan R, Davidson B, Ganapathi R, Sood AK, Rueda BR, Ambudkar SV, Gottesman MM (2011) Redefining the relevance of established cancer cell lines to the study of mechanisms of clinical anti-cancer drug resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(46):18708–18713

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hatzis C, Pusztai L, Valero V, Booser DJ, Esserman L, Lluch A, Vidaurre T, Holmes F, Souchon E, Wang H, Martin M, Cotrina J, Gomez H, Hubbard R, Chacon JI, Ferrer-Lozano J, Dyer R, Buxton M, Gong Y, Wu Y, Ibrahim N, Andreopoulou E, Ueno NT, Hunt K, Yang W, Nazario A, DeMichele A, O’Shaughnessy J, Hortobagyi GN, Symmans WF (2011) A genomic predictor of response and survival following taxane–anthracycline chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer. JAMA 305(18):1873–1881

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Henley DE, Lightman SL (2011) New insights into corticosteroid-binding globulin and glucocorticoid delivery. Neuroscience 180:1–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Iwamoto T, Lee JS, Bianchini G, Hubbard RE, Young E, Matsuoka J, Kim SB, Symmans WF, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L (2011) First generation prognostic gene signatures for breast cancer predict both survival and chemotherapy sensitivity and identify overlapping patient populations. Breast Cancer Res Treat 130(1):155–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jensen LJ, Kuhn M, Stark M, Chaffron S, Creevey C, Muller J, Doerks T, Julien P, Roth A, Simonovic M, Bork P, von Mering C (2009) STRING 8—a global view on proteins and their functional interactions in 630 organisms. Nucleic Acids Res 37(Database issue):D412–D416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Koziol JA (2010) Comments on the rank product method for analyzing replicated experiments. FEBS Lett 584(5):941–944

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li Y, Zou L, Li Q, Haibe-Kains B, Tian R, Li Y, Desmedt C, Sotiriou C, Szallasi Z, Iglehart JD, Richardson AL, Wang ZC (2010) Amplification of LAPTM4B and YWHAZ contributes to chemotherapy resistance and recurrence of breast cancer. Nat Med 16(2):214–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Li L, Wei XH, Pan YP, Li HC, Yang H, He QH, Pang Y, Shan Y, Xiong FX, Shao GZ, Zhou RL (2010) LAPTM4B: a novel cancer-associated gene motivates multidrug resistance through efflux and activating PI3K/AKT signaling. Oncogene 29(43):5785–5795

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lian H (2008) MOST: detecting cancer differential gene expression. Biostatistics 9(3):411–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lips EH, Mulder L, de Ronde JJ, Mandjes IA, Vincent A, Vrancken Peeters MT, Nederlof PM, Wesseling J, Rodenhuis S (2012) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+. Breast Cancer Res Treat 131(3):827–836

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lissner S, Nold L, Hsieh CJ, Turner JR, Gregor M, Graeve L, Lamprecht G (2010) Activity and PI3-kinase dependent trafficking of the intestinal anion exchanger downregulated in adenoma depend on its PDZ interaction and on lipid rafts. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 299(4):G907–G920

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Loo CE, Straver ME, Rodenhuis S, Muller SH, Wesseling J, Vrancken Peeters MJ, Gilhuijs KG (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging response monitoring of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: relevance of breast cancer subtype. J Clin Oncol 29(6):660–666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. MacDonald JW, Ghosh D (2006) COPA—cancer outlier profile analysis. Bioinformatics 22(23):2950–2951

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM (2006) REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Breast Cancer Res Treat 100(2):229–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Naderi A, Teschendorff AE, Beigel J, Cariati M, Ellis IO, Brenton JD, Caldas C (2007) BEX2 is overexpressed in a subset of primary breast cancers and mediates nerve growth factor/nuclear factor-kappaB inhibition of apoptosis in breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 67(14):6725–6736

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Perreard L, Fan C, Quackenbush JF, Mullins M, Gauthier NP, Nelson E, Mone M, Hansen H, Buys SS, Rasmussen K, Orrico AR, Dreher D, Walters R, Parker J, Hu Z, He X, Palazzo JP, Olopade OI, Szabo A, Perou CM, Bernard PS (2006) Classification and risk stratification of invasive breast carcinomas using a real-time quantitative RT-PCR assay. Breast Cancer Res 8(2):R23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Popovici V, Chen W, Gallas BG, Hatzis C, Shi W, Samuelson FW, Nikolsky Y, Tsyganova M, Ishkin A, Nikolskaya T, Hess KR, Valero V, Booser D, Delorenzi M, Hortobagyi GN, Shi L, Symmans WF, Pusztai L (2010) Effect of training-sample size and classification difficulty on the accuracy of genomic predictors. Breast Cancer Res 12(1):R5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Qureshi AC, Bahri A, Breen LA, Barnes SC, Powrie JK, Thomas SM, Carroll PV (2007) The influence of the route of oestrogen administration on serum levels of cortisol-binding globulin and total cortisol. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 66(5):632–635

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rhodes DR, Ateeq B, Cao Q, Tomlins SA, Mehra R, Laxman B, Kalyana-Sundaram S, Lonigro RJ, Helgeson BE, Bhojani MS, Rehemtulla A, Kleer CG, Hayes DF, Lucas PC, Varambally S, Chinnaiyan AM (2009) AGTR1 overexpression defines a subset of breast cancer and confers sensitivity to losartan, an AGTR1 antagonist. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(25):10284–10289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shimizu T, Sugiura T, Wakayama T, Kijima A, Nakamichi N, Iseki S, Silver DL, Kato Y (2011) PDZK1 regulates breast cancer resistance protein in small intestine. Drug Metab Dispos 39(11):2148–2154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tabchy A, Valero V, Vidaurre T, Lluch A, Gomez H, Martin M, Qi Y, Barajas-Figueroa LJ, Souchon E, Coutant C, Doimi FD, Ibrahim NK, Gong Y, Hortobagyi GN, Hess KR, Symmans WF, Pusztai L (2010) Evaluation of a 30-gene paclitaxel, fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy response predictor in a multicenter randomized trial in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 16(21):5351–5361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tibshirani R, Hastie T (2007) Outlier sums for differential gene expression analysis. Biostatistics 8(1):2–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G (2001) Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(9):5116–5121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Venet D, Dumont JE, Detours V (2011) Most random gene expression signatures are significantly associated with breast cancer outcome. PLoS Comput Biol 7(10):e1002240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu B (2007) Cancer outlier differential gene expression detection. Biostatistics 8(3):566–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zitvogel L, Kepp O, Kroemer G (2011) Immune parameters affecting the efficacy of chemotherapeutic regimens. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 8(3):151–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was performed within the framework of CTMM, the Center for Translational Molecular Medicine (www.ctmm.nl), project Breast CARE (Grant 03O-104). We thank Bernard Asselain, Frederique Spyratos, and Patricia de-Cremoux for sharing the Curie data with us.

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lodewyk F. A. Wessels.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 30,457 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Ronde, J.J., Lips, E.H., Mulder, L. et al. SERPINA6, BEX1, AGTR1, SLC26A3, and LAPTM4B are markers of resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 137, 213–223 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2340-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2340-x

Keywords

Navigation