Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Psychological Distress in U.S. Women Who Have Experienced False-Positive Mammograms

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In the United States, approximately 10.7% of all screening mammograms lead to a false-positive result, but the overall impact of false-positives on psychological well-being is poorly understood.

Materials and methods

Data were analyzed from the 2000 U.S. National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), the most recent national survey that included a cancer control module. Study subjects were 9,755 women who ever had a mammogram, of which 1,450 had experienced a false-positive result. Psychological distress was assessed using the validated K6 questionnaire and logistic regression was used to discern any association with previous false-positive mammograms.

Results

In a multivariate analysis, women who had indicated a previous false-positive mammogram were more likely to report feeling sad (OR = 1.18, 95% CI, 1.03–1.35), restless (OR = 1.23, 95% CI, 1.08–1.40), worthless (OR = 1.27, 95% CI, 1.04–1.54), and finding that everything was an effort (OR = 1.27, 95% CI, 1.10–1.47). These women were also more likely to have seen a mental health professional in the 12 months preceding the survey (OR = 1.28, 95% CI, 1.03–1.58) and had a higher composite score on all items of the K6 scale (P < 0.0001), a reflection of increased psychological distress. Analyses by age and race revealed that, among women who had experienced false-positives, younger women were more likely to feel that everything was an effort, and blacks were more likely to feel restless.

Conclusion

In a random sampling of the U.S. population, women who had previously experienced false-positive mammograms were more likely to report symptoms of anxiety and depression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ghafoor A, Jemal A, Ward E et al (2003) Trends in breast cancer by race and ethnicity. CA Cancer J Clin 53(6):342–355

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jatoi I. (1999) Breast cancer screening. Am J Surg 177:518–524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fletcher SW, Elmore JG (2003) Mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 348:1672–1680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, Polk S, Arena PJ, Fletcher SW (1998) Ten-year risk of false-positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J␣Med 338:1089–1096

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gram IT, Slenker SE (1992) Cancer anxiety and attitudes toward mammography among screening attenders, nonattenders, and women never invited. Am J Public Health 82:249–251

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lerman C, Trock B, Rimer BK et al (1991) Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms. Ann Intern Med 114:657–661

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lowe JB, Balanda KP, Del Mar C, Hawes E (1999) Psychological distress in women with abnormal findings in mass mammography screening. Cancer 85:1114–1118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brett J, Bankhead C, Henderson B, Watson E, Austoker J␣(2005) The psychological impact of mammographic screening. Syst Rev Psycho-Oncol 14(11):917–938

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Asbetz P, Aro AR, Sutton S (2003) Experience with breast cancer pre-screening perceived susceptibility and the psychological impact of screening. Psycho-Oncology 12:305–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dolan NC, Feinglass J, Priyanath A et al (2001) Measuring satisfaction with mammography results reporting. J Gen Intern Med 16:157–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. National Center for Health Statistics. NCHS Research Data Center. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/r&d/rdc.html

  12. Kessler RC, Barker PR, Colpe LJ et al (2003) Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatr 60:184–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Massey JT, Moore TF, Parsons VL, Tadros W (1989) Design and estimation of the National Health Interview Survey, 1985–1994. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2(110)

  14. Fontaine KR, Heo M, Allison DB (2001) Body weight and cancer screening among women. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 10:463–470

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. American College of Radiology. (1998) Illustrated Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 3rd edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fletcher SW, Elmore SG (2005) False positive mammograms—can the USA learn from Europe? Lancet 365(9453):7–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rimer BK, Bluman LG (1997) The psychosocial consequences of mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 22:131–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gilbert FJ, Cordiner CM, Affleck IR et al (1998) Breast screening: the psychological sequelae of false-positive recall in women with and without a family history of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 34:2010–2014

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cockburn J, Staples M, Hurley SF, De Luise T (1994) Psychological consequences of screening mammography. J Med Screen 1:7–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Walker LG, Cordiner CM, Gilbert FJ et al (1994) How distressing is attendance for routine breast screening? Psycho-Oncology 3:299–304

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sutton S, Saidi G, Bickler G, Hunter J (1995) Does routine screening for breast cancer raise anxiety? Results from a three-wave prospective study in England. J Epidemiol Commun Health 49:413–418

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Olsson P, Armelius K, Nordahl G et al (1999) Women with false positive screening mammograms: how do they cope? J␣Med Screen 6:89–93

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Aro AR, Absetz SP, van Elderen TM et al (2000) False-positive findings in mammography screening induces short-term distress—breast cancer-specific concern prevails longer. Eur J Cancer 36(9):1089–1097

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lampic C, Thurfjell E, Bergh J, Sjoden PO (2001) Short- and long-term anxiety and depression in women recalled after breast cancer screening. Eur J Cancer 37(4):463–469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Scalf-Klomp W, Sanderman R, van de Wiel HB et al (1997) Distressed or relieved? Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Com Health 51:705–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen CC, David A, Thampson K et al (2002) Coping strategies and psychiatric morbidity in women attending breast assessments clinics. J Psychosom Res 40:265–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Meystre-Agustoni G, Paccaud F, Jeannin A, Dubois-Arber R (2001) Anxiety in a cohort of Swiss women participating in a mammographic screening programme. J Med Screen 8:213–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Haas J, Kaplan C, McMillan A, Esserman LJ (2001) Does timely assessment affect the anxiety associated with an abnormal mammogram result? J Women Health Gen – B Med 10(6):599–605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lindfors KK, O’Connor J, Parker RA (2001) False-positive screening mammograms: effect of immedicate versus later work-up on patient stress. Radiology 218:247–253

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Loken K, Steine S, Laerum E (1998) Mammography: influence of departmental practice and women’s characteristics on patient satisfaction: comparison of six departments in Norway. Quality in Health Care 7:136–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Barton MB, Moore S, Polk S et al (2001) Increased patient concern after false-positive mammograms: clinician documentation and subsequent ambulatory visits. J Gen Intern Med 163(3):150–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Barton MB, Morley DS, Moore S et al (2004) Decreasing women’s anxieties after abnormal mammograms: a controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(7):529–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Burman ML, Taplin SH, Herta DF, Elmore JG (1999) Effect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organization. Ann Intern Med 131:1–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Pisano ED, Earp JA, Schell M, Vokaty K, Denham A (1998) Screening behavior of women after a false-positive mammogram. Radiology 208:245–249

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK et al (2005) Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353:1784–1792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, National Naval Medical Center and the Uniformed Services University, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA

    Ismail Jatoi

  2. United States Military Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA

    Kangmin Zhu & Mona Shah

  3. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA

    William Lawrence

Authors
  1. Ismail Jatoi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kangmin Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mona Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. William Lawrence
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ismail Jatoi.

Additional information

The opinions and assertions contained in this article represent the private views of the authors and should not be construed as reflecting the official views of the U.S. Departments of the Army, Navy, or Defense, or the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, or the Department of Health and Human Services

Appendix

Appendix

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jatoi, I., Zhu, K., Shah, M. et al. Psychological Distress in U.S. Women Who Have Experienced False-Positive Mammograms. Breast Cancer Res Treat 100, 191–200 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-006-9236-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-006-9236-6

Key words

Search

Navigation