Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognosis of metachronous contralateral breast cancer according to stage at diagnosis: The importance of early detection

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Detection of metachronous contralateral breast cancer (MCBC) is an important aspect of follow-up among the many women previously diagnosed with first primary breast cancer (FPBC). While randomized studies have demonstrated the efficacy of early detection of FPBC, such findings cannot be generalized to women previously diagnosed with breast cancer since they were specifically excluded from participation. In this study, we determined if detection of MCBC at stage 0–I improves prognosis among women diagnosed with stage 0–III FPBC. Using data from the 1990–2000 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, we defined MCBC as contralateral breast cancer that occurred at least 6 months after stage 0–III FPBC diagnosis. Women who developed a MCBC were categorized as having stage 0–I versus stage II–IV. To avoid lead-time bias, survival of MCBC was measured from the date of FPBC. Among 170,453 women who had been diagnosed with stage 0–III FPBC, 2904 were subsequently diagnosed with MCBC. Of these 2904 women, 329 died from breast cancer and 194 died from other causes. Seventy percent of women were diagnosed with stage 0–I MCBC. An 81% survival benefit existed for stage 0–I MCBC relative to those with stage II–IV MCBC in multivariable analysis (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.19; 95% confidence interval: 0.15–0.25). The findings are robust for various subpopulations. Unmeasured confounding was unlikely to explain the observed results in sensitivity analysis. For women with stage 0–III FPBC, diagnosis of stage 0–I MCBC is associated with an 81% reduction in risk of breast cancer death.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chu KC, Tarone RE, Kessler LG, Reis LA, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Edwards BK, et al.: Recent trends in U.S. breast cancer incidence, survival, and mortality rates J Natl Cancer Inst 88:1571–1579, 1996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. National Cancer Institute. Estimated U.S. cancer prevalence. Available from: http://dccps.nci.nih.gov/ocs/prevalence/prevalence.html#survivor. accessed 1/24/2005

  3. Palli D, Russo A, Saieva C, Ciatto S, Roselli Del Turco M, Distante V, Pacini P et al.: for the National Research Council Project on Breast Cancer Follow-up: Intensive vs clinical follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer: 10-year update of a randomized trial JAMA 281:1586–1592, 1999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. de Bock GH, Bonnema J, van Der Hage J, Kievit J, van de Velde CJH Effectiveness of routine visits and routine tests in detecting isolated locoregional recurrences after treatment for early-stage invasive breast cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic Review J Clin Oncol 22:4010–4018, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin SM, Sandrock C, Ernster VL Efficacy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis JAMA 273:149–254, 1995

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Broet P, de la Rochefordiere A, Scholl SM, Fourquet A, De RyKe Y, Pouillart P, Mosseri V, Asselian B et al.: Analyzing prognostic factors in breast cancer using a multistate model Breast Cancer Res Treat 54:83–89, 1999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Robinson E, Rennert G, Rennert HS, Neugut AI Survival of first and second primary breast cancer Cancer 71:172–176, 1993

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Grunfeld E, Noorani H, McGahan L, Paszat L, Coyle D, Van Walraven C, Joyce J, Sawka C et al.: Surveillance mammography after treatment of primary breast cancer: a systematic review Breast 11:228–235, 2002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ciatto S, Guido M, Marco Z Prognostic impact of the early detection of metachronous contralateral breast cancer Eur J Cancer 40:1496–1501, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jacobs HJ, van Dijck JA, de Kleijn EM, Kiemeney LA, Verbeek AL Routine follow-up examinations in breast cancer patients have minimal impact on life expectancy: a simulation study Ann Oncol 12(8):1107–1113, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen Y, Semenciw R, Kliewer E, Shi Y, Mao Y Incidence of second primary breast cancer among women with a first primary in Manitoba, Canada Breast Cancer Res Treat 67:35–40, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Claus EB, Stowe M, Carter D, Holford T The risk of a contralateral breast cancer among women diagnosed with ductal and lobular breast carcinoma in situ: data from the Connecticut Tumor Registry The Breast 12:451–456, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Day NE, Williams DRR, Khaw KT Breast cancer screening programmes: the development of a monitoring and evaluation system Br J Cancer 59:954–958, 1989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin DY, Psaty BM, Kronmal RA Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies Biometrics 54: 948–963, 1998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghali WA, Quan H, Brant R, Van Melle G, Norris CM, Faris PD, Galbarith PD, Knudtson ML et al.: for the APPROACH Investigators Comparison of 2 methods for calculating adjusted survival curves from proportional hazards models JAMA 286:1494–1497, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith TJ, Davidson NE, Schapira DV American Society of Clinical Oncology 1998 update of recommended Breast Cancer Surveillance Guidelines J Clin Oncol 17:1080–1089, 1999

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Temple LKF, Wang EEL, McLeod RS Preventive health care, 1999 update: 3. Follow-up after breast cancer CMAJ 161:1001–1008, 1999

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. National Cancer Institute. Breast cancer PDQ: Treatment. 11/19/2004. Available from: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/breast/healthprofessional#Section_8

  19. Loong S, Wilkins M, Bliss JM, Davidson J, Ebbs SR, Regan J, Yarnold JR et al.: The effectiveness of the routine clinic visit in the follow-up of breast cancer patients: analysis of a defined patient cohort Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 10:103–106, 1998

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hiramanek N Breast cancer recurrence: follow up after treatment for primary breast cancer Postgrad Med J 80:172–176, 2004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mertens WC, Hilbert V, Makari-Judson G Contralateral breast cancer: factors associated with stage and size at presentation Breast J 10:304–312, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wickerham L. Tamoxifen – an update on current data and where it can now be used. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 75(Suppl 1): S7-12; discussion S33-15, 2002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bergh J, Jonsson PE, Glimelius B, Nygren P A systematic overview of chemotherapy effects in breast cancer Acta Oncol 40:253–281, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Read WL, Tierney RM, Page NC, Costas I, Govindan R, Spitznagel ELJ, Piccirillo JF et al.: Differential prognostic impact of comorbidity. J Clin Oncol 22: 3099–3103, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rutqvist L, Cedermark B, Glas U, Mattsson A, Skoog L, Somell A, Theve T, Wilking N, Askergen J, Hajlmar M et al.: Contralateral primary tumors in breast cancer patients in a randomized trial of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy J Natl Cancer Inst 83:1299–1306, 1991

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schapira MM, McAuliffe TL, Nattinger AB Underutilization of mammography in older breast cancer survivors Med Care 38: 281–289, 2000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes–Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri, for the use of the Health Behavior and Outreach Core, especially James Struthers, for data management and selected statistical services. This research was supported in part by grants from the National Cancer Institute (CA91842; CA91734; CA98594; CA100760; CA10712) and the Agency for Health Research and Quality (HS 14095).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Schootman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schootman, M., Fuortes, L. & Aft, R. Prognosis of metachronous contralateral breast cancer according to stage at diagnosis: The importance of early detection. Breast Cancer Res Treat 99, 91–95 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-006-9185-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-006-9185-0

Keywords

Navigation