Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ovarian cancer surgery: health and coping during the perioperative period

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The study objective was to survey general health and coping in women undergoing ovarian cancer surgery, and subsequently to develop and test a supportive care intervention.

Methods/materials

Women who underwent surgery on the suspicion of ovarian cancer participated in a follow-up questionnaire study in which the Short Form-36 Questionnaire was used to survey general health twice during the perioperative period and the Life Orientation Questionnaire (SOC) was used once to define the postoperative coping capacity. An evidence-based, preoperative supportive care programme was subsequently developed and tested. This consisted of lean methodology applied to clinical pathways, preoperative optimisation, and psychosocial care and support.

Results

From 294 women allocated to three study groups, a total of 546 Short Form-36 questionnaires and 253 SOC questionnaires were available for analysis. The overall response rate was 86 %.

The presence of ascites, a pelvic mass, and a Risk of Malignancy Index >200 proved to be appropriate clinical markers for intensified preoperative care. Concerning physical health, levels were low throughout the perioperative period; the majority however stayed within standard levels. Concerning mental health, levels were below standard during the entire period, but did improve with time, also in women in whom the potential cancer diagnosis was refuted. The preoperative differences between these groups leveled out postoperatively in terms of physical health. At the end of the perioperative period, the coping capacity was close to normal.

Conclusions

A need for supportive care during the perioperative period was identified. This should be adjusted to the nature of the disease and the extent of the treatment. Participation in a preoperative supportive programme supported physical health during the perioperative period; however, further support of mental health seemed required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coleman MP, Forman D, Bryant H, Butler J, Rachet B, Maringe C et al (2011) Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995–2007 (the international cancer benchmarking partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data. Lancet 377:127–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hannibal CG, Cortes R, Engholm G, Kjaer SK (2008) Survival of ovarian cancer patients in Denmark: excess mortality risk analysis of five-year relative survival in the period 1978–2002. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87:1353–1360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. The Danish Ministry of Welfare. Copenhagen. Law on health (2006) [In Danish] §§ 88 and §§ 89

  4. Marx C, Rasmussen T, Jakobsen DH, Ottosen C, Lundvall L, Ottesen B et al (2006) The effect of accelerated rehabilitation on recovery after surgery for ovarian malignancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85:488–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fago-Olsen CL, Hogdall C, Kehlet H, Christensen IJ, Ottesen B (2011) Centralized treatment of advanced stages of ovarian cancer improves survival: a nationwide Danish survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90(3):273–279

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hogdall CK, Nielsen NLS, Taaning L (2008) The Danish Gynaecological Cancer Database. Copenhagen. Annual report

  7. Grann AF, Norgaard M, Blaakaer J, Sogaard-Andersen E, Jacobsen JB (2011) Survival of patients with ovarian cancer in central and northern Denmark, 1998–2009. Clin Epidemiol 3(Suppl 1):59–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tetsche MS, Dethlefsen C, Pedersen L, Sorensen HT, Norgaard M (2008) The impact of comorbidity and stage on ovarian cancer mortality: a nationwide Danish cohort study. BMC Cancer 8:31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tetsche MS, Norgaard M, Jacobsen J, Wogelius P, Sorensen HT (2008) Comorbidity and ovarian cancer survival in Denmark, 1995–2005: a population-based cohort study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 18:421–427

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Henriksen MG, Jensen MB, Hansen HV, Jespersen TW, Hessov I (2002) Enforced mobilization, early oral feeding, and balanced analgesia improve convalescence after colorectal surgery. Nutrition 18:147–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Norlyk A, Harder I (2009) After colonic surgery: the lived experience of participating in a fast-track programme. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-Being 4:170–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schulman-Green D, Ercolano E, Dowd M, Schwartz P, McCorkle R (2008) Quality of life among women after surgery for ovarian cancer. Palliat Support Care 6:239–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. von Gruenigen VE, Frasure HE, Jenison EL, Hopkins MP, Gil KM (2006) Longitudinal assessment of quality of life and lifestyle in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients: the roles of surgery and chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol 103:120–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun CC, Ramirez PT, Bodurka DC (2007) Quality of life for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 4:18–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bjorner JB, Thunedborg K, Kristensen TS, Modvig J, Bech P (1998) The Danish SF-36 health survey: translation and preliminary validity studies. J Clin Epidemiol 51:991–999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Eriksson M, Lindstrom B (2006) Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale and the relation with health: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health 60:376–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Antonovsky A (1993) The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Soc Sci Med 36:725–733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Antonovsky A (1993) Coping with cancer stressors: a salutogenic approach. Eur J Cancer 29:S262–S268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. World Medical Association (1964) The World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. World Medical Association, Ferney-Voltaire

    Google Scholar 

  21. CONSORT Statement Website. http://clinicaltrials.gov/. 02.08.2012

  22. Mitchell M (2007) Psychological care of patients undergoing elective surgery. Nurs Stand 21:48–55, quiz 58, 60

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cox K, Wilson E (2003) Follow-up for people with cancer: nurse-led services and telephone interventions. J Adv Nurs 43:51–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Langius A, Björvell H (1996) Den salutogena modellen och använding av KASAM-formuläret i omvårdnadsforskning–en metodredovisning [The salutogenetic model and the use of the SOC questionnaire in nursing research]. Vård i Norden [Nordic Caring Science] 16:28–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. McCorkle R, Dowd M, Ercolano E, Schulman-Green D, Williams AL, Siefert ML et al (2009) Effects of a nursing intervention on quality of life outcomes in post-surgical women with gynecological cancers. Psychooncology 18:62–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully thank the women who completed the questionnaires. As part of a larger study, the study has been funded by grants from: the Danish Cancer Society, Psychosocial Research Committee; the Danish Nurses’ Organisation; the Research Foundation of Health Science in Central Denmark Region; the Research Foundation of Aarhus University Hospital; the Hede Nielsen Foundation; the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lene Seibaek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seibaek, L., Blaakaer, J., Petersen, L.K. et al. Ovarian cancer surgery: health and coping during the perioperative period. Support Care Cancer 21, 575–582 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1556-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1556-y

Keywords

Navigation