Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography in staging bladder cancer: a single-institution study and a systematic review with meta-analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose with positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG–PET–CT) to predict nodal metastases in patients with bladder cancer (BC) scheduled to undergo radical cystectomy (RC).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed records of patients diagnosed with BC and scheduled to undergo RC at our center from January 2011 through February 2015, who also underwent FDG–PET–CT at the time of diagnosis. All patients underwent RC and an extended pelvic lymph node dissection as the reference standard. The primary endpoints were the sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of FDG–PET–CT in detecting lymph node metastasis. We also examined its accuracy in identifying distant metastasis. In addition, we conducted a protocol-driven systematic review and meta-analysis of accuracy of FDG–PET–CT for preoperative staging of BC, as compared to CT alone, as reported in individual studies. To assess the methodological quality of eligible studies, we used the QUADAS-2 tool (a revised tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) and pooled diagnostic accuracy measures using Meta-DiSc statistical software.

Results

For detecting nodal metastases in 78 patients, the sensitivity of FDG–PET–CT was 0.56 (95 % CI 0.29–0.80) and the specificity, 0.98 (95 % CI 0.91–1.00). Pooled sensitivity and specificity for detecting lymph node metastasis were 0.57 and 0.95, respectively. Positive likelihood ratio was 9.02. All lesions that were suspicious for distant metastasis were found to be positive on biopsy.

Conclusion

FDG–PET–CT was more accurate than CT alone in staging BC in patients undergoing surgery. Standardization of FDG–PET–CT protocol and cost-effectiveness analysis are required before widespread implementation of this technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Herr HW, Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Donat SM, Reuter VE, Bajorin DF (2002) Impact of the number of lymph nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. J Urol 167(3):1295–1298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, Groshen S, Feng AC, Boyd S et al (2001) Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol 19(3):666–675

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mertens LS, Fioole-Bruining A, Vegt E, Vogel WV, van Rhijn BW, Horenblas S (2013) Impact of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) on management of patients with carcinoma invading bladder muscle. BJU Int 112(6):729–734

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Anjos DA, Etchebehere EC, Ramos CD, Santos AO, Albertotti C, Camargo EE (2007) 18F-FDG PET/CT Delayed Images After Diuretic for Restaging Invasive Bladder Cancer. J Nucl Med 48(5):764–770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thoeny HC, Triantafyllou M, Birkhaeuser FD et al (2009) Combined ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging reliably detect pelvic lymph node metastases in normal-sized nodes of bladder and prostate cancer patients. Eur Urol 55(4):761–769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kibel AS, Dehdashti F, Katz MD, Klim AP, Grubb RL, Humphrey PA, Siegel C, Cao D, Gao F, Siegel BA (2009) Prospective Study of [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Staging of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 27(26):4314–4320

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Grigsby PW, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F (2001) Lymph node staging by positron emission tomography in patients with carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol 19(17):3745–3749

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vansteenkiste J, Stroobants S, Dupont P, De Leyn PR, Verbeken EK, Deneffe GJ et al (1999) Prognostic importance of the standardized uptake value on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in non-small cell lung cancer: an analysis of 125 cases. J Clin Oncol 17(10):3201–3206

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Koh DM, Hughes M, Husband JE (2006) Crosssectional imaging of nodal metastases in the abdomen and pelvis. Abdom Imaging 31(6):632–643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zamora J, Abraira V, Muriel A, Khan K, Coomarasamy A (2006) Meta-DiSc: a software for meta analysis of test accuracy data. BMC Med Res Methodol 12(6):31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, Leeflang MM, Sterne JA, Bossuyt PM (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155(8):529–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lodde M, Lacombe L, Friede J, Morin F, Saourine A, Fradet Y (2010) Evaluation of fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography with computed tomography for staging of urothelial carcinoma. BJU Int 106(5):658–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nayak B, Dogra PN, Naswa N, Kumar R (2013) Diuretic 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for detection and locoregional staging of urinary bladder cancer: prospective evaluation of a novel technique. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 40(3):386–393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bouchelouche K, Turkbey B, Choyke PL (2012) PET/CT and MRI in Bladder Cancer. J Cancer Sci Ther S14(1):7692

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Goodfellow H, Viney Z, Hughes P, Rankin S, Rottenberg G, Hughes S, Evison F, Dasgupta P, O’Brien T, Khan MS (2013) Role of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET)–computed tomography (CT) in the staging of bladder cancer. BJU Int 114(3):389–395

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hitier-Berthault M, Ansquer C, Branchereau J, Renaudin K, Bodere F, Bouchot O, Rigaud J (2013) 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography for preoperative lymph node staging in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a prospective study. Int J Urol 20(8):788–796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Swinnen G, Maes A, Pottel H, Vanneste A, Billiet I, Lesage K, Werbrouck P (2010) FDG–PET/CT for the preoperative lymph node staging of invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol 57(4):641–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jensen TK, Holt P, Gerke O, Riehmann M, Svolgaard B, Marcussen N, Bouchelouche K (2011) Preoperative lymph-node staging of invasive urothelial bladder cancer with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed axial tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with histopathology. Scand J Urol Nephrol 45(2):122–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contribution

Soubra substantially contributed to project development, data collection and management, data analysis, manuscript writing and editing. Hayward contributed to data collection, data analysis and manuscript editing. Dahm substantially contributed to protocol and project development, data analysis, manuscript writing and editing. Goldfarb contributed to data collection and management and manuscript writing/editing. Froehlich contributed to protocol development and data analysis. Jha contributed to project development, data analysis and manuscript editing. Konety substantially contributed to protocol/project development, data analysis, manuscript writing and editing. We would like to thank Mary Knatterud, PhD, for her excellent editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Badrinath R. Konety.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have no actual or potential conflict of interest to disclose. The authors did not receive any funding for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Ethical standards

This research has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Institutional review board approval was obtained.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soubra, A., Hayward, D., Dahm, P. et al. The diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography in staging bladder cancer: a single-institution study and a systematic review with meta-analysis. World J Urol 34, 1229–1237 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1772-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1772-z

Keywords

Navigation