Skip to main content
Top

29-12-2015 | Gynecologic cancers | Article

Appropriate Recommendations for Surgical Debulking in Stage IV Ovarian Cancer

Journal: Current Treatment Options in Oncology

Authors: Jing-Yi Chern, ScM, MD, John P. Curtin, MD

Publisher: Springer US

Abstract

Epithelial ovarian cancer continues to be the leading cause of death due to gynecologic malignancy, and it is the fifth leading cause of cancer death in women in the USA and seventh worldwide. In most women with ovarian cancer, the disease is diagnosed at an advanced stage and primary cytoreductive surgery is considered standard of care. Traditionally, the gynecologic oncology literature supports the dictum that aggressive radical debulking to reduce intra-abdominal tumor burden to minimal or less than 1 cm of disease has significant impact on overall survival. However, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial found that survival after neoadjuvant followed by interval debulking surgery was similar to survival with the standard approach of primary surgery followed by chemotherapy. Many gynecologic oncologists have now adopted neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of stage IV ovarian cancer given the complex nature of this disease. Currently, there are conflicting results in the literature with regards to neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary debulking for stage IV ovarian cancer. While there is evidence that neoadjuvant treatment is not inferior to primary debulking, the literature also supports that maximizing debulking efforts with radical surgery can provide a survival benefit in patients with stage IV ovarian carcinoma.
Literature
2.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(1):5–29.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray, F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2014. http://​www.​wcrf.​org/​int/​cancer-facts-figures/​worldwide-data, searched 1 Aug 2015
4.
National Cancer Institute, Surveillance, epidemiology and end result program. www.​cancer.​gov/​statfacts/​html/​ovary.​html, searched 11 Jul 2015
5.
Aletti G, Dowdy SC, Podratz KC, Cliby WA. Analysis of factors impacting operability in stage IV ovarian cancer: rationale use of a triage system. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;105:84–9.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Winter WE, Maxwell L, Tian C, Sundborg MJ, Rose GS, Rose PG, et al. Tumor residual after surgical reduction in prediction of clinical outcome in stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(1):83–9.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Fader AN, Rose PG. Role of surgery in ovarian carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(20):2873–83.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Butler-Manuel S, Lippiatt J, Madhuri TK. Interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage IVB ovarian cancer using neutral argon plasma (Plasmajet). Gynecol Oncol. 2014;135(3):622–3.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Juretzka MM, Abu-Rustem NR, Sonoda Y, Downey RJ, Flores RM, Park BJ, et al. The impact of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in patients with suspected ovarian malignancies and pleural effusions. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;104:670–4.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Miegs JV. Tumors of the pelvic organs. New York: Macmillian; 1934.
11.
Griffiths CT. Surgical resection of tumor bulk in the primary treatment of ovarian carcinoma. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1975;42:101–4.PubMed
12.
Makar AP, Baekelandt M, Trope CG, Kristensen GB. The prognostic significance of residual disease, FIGO substage, tumor histology, and grade in patients with FIGO stage III ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1995;56:175–80.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Hoskins WJ, Bundy BN, Thigpen JT, Omura GA. The influence of cytoreductive surgery on the recurrence free interval and survival in small volume stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol. 1992;47:159–66.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Akahira J, Yoshikawa H, Shimizu Y, Tsunematsu R, Hirakawa T, Kuramoto H, et al. Prognostic factors of stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer: a multicenter retrospective study. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;81:398–03.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Hoskins WJ, McGuire WP, Brady MF, Homesley HD, Creasman WT, Berman M, et al. The effect of diameter of largest residual disease on survival after primary cytoreductive surgery in patients with suboptimal residual epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170(4):974–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Yang XJ, Zheng FY, Xu YS, Ou RY. Ovarian cancer initially presenting with isolated ipsilateral superficial inguinal lymph node metastasis: a case study and review of the literature. J Ovarian Res. 2014;7:20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Pereira A, Perez-Medina T, Magrina JF, Magtibay PM, Rodriguez-Tapia A, Perez-Milan F, et al. The impact of pelvic retroperitoneal invasion and distant nodal metastases in epithelial ovarian cancer. Surg Oncol. 2014;23:40–4.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Curtin JP, Malik R, Venkatraman ES, Barakat RR, Hoskins WJ. Stage IV ovarian cancer: impact of surgical debulking. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;64:9–12.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Munkarah AR, Hallum AV, Morris M, Burke TW, Levenback C, Atkinson EN, et al. Prognostic significance of residual disease in patients with stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;64:13–7.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Liu PC, Benjamin I, Morgan MA, King SA, Mikuta JJ, Rubin SC. Effect of surgical debulking on survival in stage IV ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;64:4–8.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Bristow RE, Montz FJ, Lagasse LD, Leuchter RS, Karlan BY. Survival impact of surgical cytoreduction in stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;72:278–87.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Aletti GD, Podratz KC, Cliby WA, Gostout BS. Stage IV ovarian cancer: disease site-specific rationale for postoperative treatment. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;112:22–7.PubMedCrossRef
23.••
Chi DS, Musa F, Dao F, Zivanovic O, Sonoda Y, Leitao MM, et al. An analysis of patients with bulky advanced stage ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma treated with primary debulking surgery (PDS) during an identical time period as the randomized EORTC-NCIC trial of PDS vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124:10–4. Comparison of primary debulking surgery to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian, tubal and peritoneal carcinoma based on EORTC-NCIC trial criteria.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Panici PB, Maggioni A, Hacker N, Landoni F, Ackermann S, Campagnutta E, et al. Systemic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy versus resection of bulky nodes only in optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(8):560–6.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Chang SJ, Bristow RE, Ryu HS. Impact of complete cytoreduction leaving no gross residual disease associated with radical cytoreductive surgical procedures on survival in advanced ovarian cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:4059–67.PubMedCrossRef
26.••
Luyckx M, Leblanc E, Filleron T, Morice P, Darai E, Classe JM, et al. Maximal cytoreduction in patients with FIGO stage IIIC to stage IV ovarian, fallopian, and peritoneal cancer in day-to-day practice. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012;22(8):1337–43. A large multi-center study validating the prognostic factor of maximal cytoreduction in advanced stage ovarian cancer and its significant impact on survival.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Elattar A, Bryant A, Winter-Roach BA, Hatem M, Naik R. Optimal primary surgical treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;10(8):1–67.
28.
Kang S, Kim TJ, Nam BH, Seo SS, Kim BG, Bae DS, et al. Preoperative serum CA-125 level and risk of suboptimal cytoreduction in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2010;101:13–7.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Gomez-Hildago NR, Martinez-Cannon BA, Nick AM, Lu KH, Sood AK, Coleman RL, et al. Predictors of optimal cytoreduction in patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: time to incorporate laparoscopic assessment into the standard of care. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;137:553–8.CrossRef
30.•
Petrillo M, Vizzielli G, Fanfani F, Gallotta V, Cosentino F, Chiantera V, et al. Definition of a dynamic laparoscopic model for the prediction of incomplete cytoreduction in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: proof of a concept. Gynecol Oncol. 2015. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ygyno.​2015.​07.​095. Most recent update on staging laparoscopy prior to debulking surgery and the impact on patient management.
31.
Fagotti A, Ferrandina G, Fanfani F, Garganese G, Vizzielli G, Carone VSalerno MG, et al. Prospective validation of a laparoscopic predictive model for optimal cytoreduction in advanced ovarian carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(6):642.e1–6.CrossRef
32.
Fagotti A, Vizzielli G, Fanfani F, Costantini B, Ferrandina G, Gallotta V, et al. Introduction of staging laparoscopy in the management of advanced epithelial ovarian, tubal and peritoneal cancer: impact on prognosis in a single institution experience. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;131(2):341–6.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Vizzielli G, Costantini B, Tortorella L, Petrillo M, Fanfani F, Chiantera V, et al. Influence of intraperitoneal dissemination assessed by laparoscopy on prognosis of advanced ovarian cancer: an exploratory analysis of a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:3970–7.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Rutten MJ, Leeflang MM, Kenter GG, Mol BW, Buist M. Laparoscopy for diagnosing resectability of disease in patients with ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2:CD009786. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD009786.​pub2.PubMed
35.
Chi DS, Eisenhauer EI, Zivanovic O, Sonoda Y, Abu-Rustum NR, Levine DA, et al. Improved progression-free survival and overall survival in advanced ovarian cancer as a result of a change in surgical paradigm. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114:26–31.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Harter P, Muallem ZM, Buhrmann C, Lorenz D, Kaub C, Hils R, et al. Impact of a structured quality management program on surgical outcome in primary advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;121:615–9.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Perri T, Ben-Baruch G, Kalfon S, Beiner ME, Helpman L, Hogan LBD, et al. Abdominopelvic cytoreduction rates and recurrence sites in stage IV ovarian cancer: is there a case for thoracic cytoreduction? Gynecol Oncol. 2013;131:27–31.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Diaz JP, Abu-Rustem NR, Sonoda Y, Downey RJ, Park BJ, Flores RM, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) evaluation of pleural effusion in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian carcinoma can influence the primary management choice for these patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116:483–8.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Klar M, Farthmann J, Bossart M, Stremmel C, Gitsch G, Passlick B, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) evaluation of intrathoracic disease in patients with FIGO III and IV stage ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;126:397–2.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Hoffman MS, Griffin D, Tebes S, Cardosi RJ, Martino MA, Fiorica JV, et al. Sites of bowel resected to achieve optimal ovarian cancer cytoreduction: implications regarding surgical management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(2):582–6.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Vergote I, Trope CG, Amant F, Kristensen GB, Ehlen T, Johnson N, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(10):943–53.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Kehoe S, Hook J, Nankivell M, et al. Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2015;386:249–57.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Rosen B, Laframboise S, Ferguson S, Dodge J, Bernardini M, Murphy J, et al. The impacts of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and of debulking surgery on survival from advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;134:462–7.PubMedCrossRef