Skip to main content
Top

08-01-2019 | Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma | Brief review | Article

Emerging therapies for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

Authors: Dawn Queen, Adriana Lopez, Larisa J Geskin

Disclosures

Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) are a heterogeneous group of T-lymphocyte malignancies that primarily present in the skin. Mycosis fungoides (MF), the most common subtype of CTCL, presents as erythematous patches and plaques with indolent clinical behavior. Occasionally, disease may progress to tumors, and nodal or visceral involvement. Sézary syndrome (SS), the leukemic form of CTCL, presents as erythroderma – often with severe pruritus. Clinical staging is based on the skin involvement (tumor), node, metastasis, and blood (TNMB) system and more advanced stages are associated with poorer prognosis [1]. Initial workup for patients with suspected MF/SS requires skin biopsy, which is the gold standard for diagnosis. Evaluation of the biopsies may include immunophenotyping and evaluation for clonal T-cell receptor gene rearrangements. Additional staging procedures may include peripheral blood flow cytometry, imaging, and, in rare cases, bone marrow biopsy. 

Mycosis Fungoides and Sezary Syndrome © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015Clinical presentation of a) mycosis fungoides and b) Sézary Syndrome. Reproduced from © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015. Carter J.B., Goyal A. & McDivitt Duncan L. (eds) Atlas of Cutaneous Lymphomas. 10.1007/978-3-319-17217-0

The CTCL treatment landscape

To date, the only curative treatment for CTCL is allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, which is only suitable for a small subset of patients. Therefore, treatment is instead focused on symptomatic management. Choice of treatment is based on the subtype of CTCL and stage of disease at diagnosis [2]. Treatments can be divided into skin-directed therapies (SDTs) and systemic therapies. 

Early stage CTCL

For early-stage disease, SDTs are first-line options, and the mainstays of treatment include corticosteroids, ultraviolet light therapy, topical bexarotene gel (Targretin® gel), and topical mechlorethamine gel (nitrogen mustard gel; Valchlor®) (Table 1). Topical steroids and UV light therapy are common therapies for MF, used off-label for this indication. Topical bexarotene gel was FDA-approved in 2000 for refractory or persistent early-stage CTCL and had a response rate (RR) of 54% in early stage disease [3]. Mechlorethamine gel was FDA-approved a decade later in 2013 after the gel was found to have a CAILS RR of 60%, comparable to the ointment formulation in a non-inferiority trial [4]. Mechlorethamine and bexarotene gels have not been compared head-to-head in a randomized clinical trial.

Investigational medications for early stage CTCL

Numerous topical agents are currently under investigation for early stage CTCL, and results are pending from these clinical trials.

Table 1: Early stage agents. Agents available or currently under investigation for treatment of early stage CTCL (Stages IA–IIA).

Early stage (IA–IIA) agents

Mechanism of action

Phase of development

Topical bexarotene gel 1% (Targretin® gel)

Selectively binds with and activates retinoid X receptors

FDA approved in 2000 [3]

Mechlorethamine gel 0.016% (Nitrogen mustard gel; Valchlor®)

Inhibits rapidly proliferating cells

FDA approved in 2013 [4]

Topical resiquimod

Stimulates Toll-like receptor 7/8

Phase I trial

Photoactivated synthetic hypericin (SGX301)

Thought to possess significant antiproliferative effects against malignant T cells

Phase III trial

Remetinostat gel

Inhibits HDAC

Phase II trial [6]

Microneedle array-doxorubicin (MNA-D)

Delivers doxorubicin directly to cutaneous lesions

Phase I trial

Advanced-stage CTCL

Advanced disease is usually treated with systemic therapies in conjunction with SDTs for symptomatic relief (Table 2). Systemic therapies can be divided by class and mechanism of action, and can be used as monotherapies or in combination [8]. There are limited effective and durable treatment options for patients with advanced disease, and a lack of controlled trials comparing the different agents head-to-head. FDA-approved agents include oral bexarotene (Targretin®)[9], denileukin difitox (ONTAK®) [10], extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP; THERAKOS® CELLEX® Photopheresis System) [11], and HDAC inhibitors  such as vorinostat (Zolinza®) [12] and romidepsin (Istodax®) [13], among others.

In 2009, the chemotherapeutic agent pralatrexate (Folotyn®), an antimetabolite folate analog, was approved by the FDA for the treatment of patients with peripheral TCL. Compendial approval for transformed MF was granted based on findings from the  PROPEL study, which showed an objective RR in the transformed mycosis fungoides subgroup of 25% (n=3) per independent central review and 58% (n=7) per investigator assessment [14].

More recently, the antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris®), which targets CD30+ cells in CTCL, was approved. Approval was based on results from the phase III  ALCANZA trial, in which brentuximab vedotin demonstrated superior efficacy to standard-of-care therapy such as methotrexate or bexarotene, with durable responses [15].

In 2018, mogamulizumab (Poteligeo®), a humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that targets the C-C chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) expressed on CTCL cells [16], was approved for MF and SS patients who have received at least one prior systemic therapy. The results from a pivotal phase III study showed that mogamulizumab reduced the risk of progression or death by 47% compared with vorinostat [17].

Investigational medications for advanced stage CTCL

A multitude of therapies with novel mechanisms of action as well as new combinations are also being investigated in ongoing clinical trials for advanced-stage CTCL.

Importantly, the genetic classification of CTCL was recently created by compiling and analyzing raw data from 139 CTCL cases from seven deep-sequencing studies of MF and SS [18]. Analysis revealed significant mutual exclusivity of mutations and disrupted pathways in CTCL. Importantly, in SS, mutually exclusive mutations occur in the NFkB pathway genes PLCG1, CARD11, TNFRSF1B, and KIT. This has important therapeutic implications as it suggests that selective targeting of patient-specific mutations may direct future therapy. That is, agents like proteasome inhibitors or JAK inhibitors that target specific pathways may be optimally used in specific subsets of patients. Further tests are needed to validate this genetic classification system as a tool for guiding future therapy.

Table 2: Advanced-stage agents. Agents available or currently under investigation for treatment of advanced stage CTCL (Stages IIB–SS).

Advanced-stage (IIB–SS) agents

Mechanism of action

Phase of development

Oral bexarotene (Targretin®)

Selectively activates retinoid X receptors

FDA approved in 1999 [9]

Denileukin difitox (ONTAK®)

Directs the cytocidal action of diphtheria toxin to cells that express the IL-2 receptor

FDA approved in 1999 [10]

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP; THERAKOS® CELLEX® Photopheresis System)

Treats extracorporeally circulating leukocytes with UVA activated psoralen

FDA approved in 1998 [11]

Vorinostat (Zolinza®)

HDAC inhibitor

FDA approved in 2006 [12]

Romidepsin (depsipeptide; FK228; Istodax®)

HDAC inhibitor

FDA approved in 2009 [13]

Pralatrexate (Folotyn®)

Inhibits dihydrofolate reductase

FDA approved in 2009 for transformed MF [14]

Brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris®)

Targets CD30

FDA approved in 2017 [15]

Mogamulizumab (Poteligeo®)

Targets CCR4

FDA approved in 2018 [17]

Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®)

PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor

Phase II Trial [19]

Bortezomib (Velcade®)

Proteasome inhibitor

Phase II trial [22]

Marizomib (MRZ, NPI-0052)

Second generation proteasome inhibitor

Phase I trial

Cobomarsen (MRG-106)

Inhibitor of microRNA-155 which is thought to promote malignant T cell proliferation

Phase I trial

Lenalidomide (CC-5013, Revlimid®)

Immunomodulatory activity

Phase II trial [27]

Ruxolitinib (Jakafi®)

JAK inhibitor

Phase II trial

AFM13

Recruits NK cells via binding to CD16A as immune effector cells

Phase IB/IIA trial

Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC, Imlygic™)

Stimulates antitumor immune response

Phase II trial

Conclusion

CTCL is a challenging disease to treat, and current therapy focuses on preventing progression rather than curing the disease completely. The number of available treatments has increased in recent years and the future is promising as yet more new classes of drugs and novel mechanisms of delivery are being explored. In particular, the development of the genetic classification system for CTCL may allow for selective targeting of therapy to patient-specific mutations.

Literature
  1. Kim YH, Liu HL, Mraz-Gernhard S, Varghese A, Hoppe RT. Long-term outcome of 525 patients with mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome: clinical prognostic factors and risk for disease progression. Arch Dermatol 2003; 139(7): 857–866.
  2. Willemze R, Hodak E, Zinzani PL, Specht L, Ladetto M. Primary cutaneous lymphomas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2018; 29(Suppl 4): iv30–iv40.
  3. Duvic M, Martin AG, Kim Y et al. Phase 2 and 3 clinical trial of oral bexarotene (Targretin capsules) for the treatment of refractory or persistent early-stage cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Arch Dermatol 2001; 137(5): 581–593.
  4. Lessin SR, Duvic M, Guitart J et al. Topical chemotherapy in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: positive results of a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial testing the efficacy and safety of a novel mechlorethamine, 0.02%, gel in mycosis fungoides. JAMA Dermatol 2013; 149(1): 25–32.
  5. Rook AH, Gelfand JM, Wysocka M et al. Topical resiquimod can induce disease regression and enhance T-cell effector functions in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Blood 2015; 126(12): 1452–1461.
  6. Duvic M, Guitart J, Huen A et al. 607 Anti-pruritic properties of remetinostat (SHAPE), a topical histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi); data from a randomized phase 2 study in patients with stage IA- IIA mycosis fungoides. J Invest Dermatol 2018; 138(5): S103.
  7. Akilov O, McCann S, Erdos G, Falo LD. Phase 1, single-arm, open-label, dose escalation trial of microneedle array-doxorubicin in patients with mycosis fungoides. EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force Meeting 2018; Eur J Cancer 2018; 101: S1eS40.
  8. Geskin LJ. Chapter 105. Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome). In: Williams Hematology 8th ed. Edited by K Kaushansky et al.  New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2010.
  9. Duvic M, Martin AG, Kim Y, et al. Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trial of Oral Bexarotene (Targretin Capsules) for the Treatment of Refractory or Persistent Early-Stage Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma. Arch Dermatol 2001; 137(5): 581–593. 
  10. Prince HM, Duvic M, Martin A, Sterry W, Assaf C, Sun Y, Straus D, Acosta M,Negro-Vilar A. Phase III placebo-controlled trial of denileukin diftitox for patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28(11): 1870–1877.
  11. Edelson R, Berger C, Gasparro F et al. Treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma by extracorporeal photochemotherapy. Preliminary results. New Engl J Med 1987; 316: 297–303.
  12. Olsen EA, Kim YH, Kuzel TM et al. Phase IIb multicenter trial of vorinostat in patients with persistent, progressive, or treatment refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25(21): 3109–3115.
  13. Piekarz RL, Frye R, Turner M et al. Phase II multi-institutional trial of the histone deacetylase inhibitor romidepsin as monotherapy for patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27(32): 5410–5417.
  14. Foss F, Horwitz SM, Coiffier B et al. Pralatrexate is an effective treatment for relapsed or refractory transformed mycosis fungoides: a subgroup efficacy analysis from the PROPEL study. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2012; 12(4): 238–243.
  15. Kim YH, Whittaker S, Horwitz S et al. Brentuximab Vedotin Demonstrates Significantly Superior Clinical Outcomes in Patients with CD30-Expressing Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma Versus Physician's Choice (Methotrexate or Bexarotene): The Phase 3 Alcanza Study. Blood 2016; 128(22): 182.
  16. Duvic M, Evans M, Wang C. Mogamulizumab for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: recent advances and clinical potential. Ther Adv Hematol 2016; 7(3): 171–174.
  17. Kim YH, Bagot M, Pinter-Brown LH et al. Anti-CCR4 Monoclonal Antibody, Mogamulizumab, Demonstrates Significant Improvement in PFS Compared to Vorinostat in Patients with Previously Treated Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL): Results from the Phase III MAVORIC Study. Blood 2017; 130: 817.
  18. Chang LW, Patrone C, Yang W et al. An Integrated Data Resource for Genomic Analysis of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma. J Invest Dermatol 2018; 138: e2681–e2683
  19. Khodadoust M, Rook AH, Porcu P et al. Pembrolizumab for Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Mycosis Fungoides and Sezary Syndrome: Clinical Efficacy in a Citn Multicenter Phase 2 Study. Blood 2016; 128(22): 181.
  20. Sors A, Jean-Louis F, Pellet C et al. Down-regulating constitutive activation of the NF-kappaB canonical pathway overcomes the resistance of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma to apoptosis. Blood 2006; 107(6): 2354–2363.
  21. Izban KF, Ergin M, Qin JZ et al. Constitutive expression of NF-kappa B is a characteristic feature of mycosis fungoides: implications for apoptosis resistance and pathogenesis. Hum Pathol 2000; 31(12): 1482–1490.
  22. Zinzani PL, Musuraca G, Tani M et al. Phase II trial of proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in patients with relapsed or refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25(27): 4293–4297.
  23. Potts BC, Albitar MX, Anderson KC et al. Marizomib, a proteasome inhibitor for all seasons: preclinical profile and a framework for clinical trials. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2011; 11(3): 254–284.
  24. Kopp KL, Ralfkiaer U, Gjerdrum LM et al. STAT5-mediated expression of oncogenic miR-155 in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Cell Cycle 2013; 12(12): 1939–1947.
  25. Foss FM, Querfeld C, Kim YH et al. Ph 1 study of MRG-106, an inhibitor of miR-155, in CTCL. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36(Suppl 15): 2511.
  26. Kotla V, Goel S, NIschal S, et al. Mechanism of action of lenalidomide in hematological malignancies. J Hematol Oncol 2009; 2: 36
  27. Querfeld C, Rosen ST, Guitart J et al. Results of an open-label multicenter phase 2 trial of lenalidomide monotherapy in refractory mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. Blood 2014; 123(8): 1159–1166.
  28. McGirt LY, Jia P, Baerenwald DA et al. Whole genome sequencing reveals oncogenic mutations in mycosis fungoides. Blood 2015; 126(4): 508–519.
  29. Kohlhapp FJ, Kaufman HL. Molecular Pathways: Mechanism of Action for Talimogene Laherparepvec, a New Oncolytic Virus Immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 22(5): 1048–1054.