Skip to main content
Top

21-09-2017 | Colorectal cancer | Article

Proteomic Features of Colorectal Cancer Identify Tumor Subtypes Independent of Oncogenic Mutations and Independently Predict Relapse-Free Survival

Journal: Annals of Surgical Oncology

Authors: Callisia N. Clarke, MD, Michael S. Lee, MD, Wei Wei, PhD, Ganiraju Manyam, PhD, Zhi-Qin Jiang, PhD, Yiling Lu, MD, Jeffrey Morris, PhD, Bradley Broom, PhD, David Menter, PhD, Eduardo Vilar-Sanchez, MD, PhD, Kanwal Raghav, MD, Cathy Eng, MD, George J. Chang, MD, Iris Simon, PhD, Rene Bernards, PhD, Michael Overman, MD, Gordon B. Mills, MD, PhD, Dipen Maru, MD, Scott Kopetz, MD, PhD

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Abstract

Background

The directed study of the functional proteome in colorectal cancer (CRC) has identified critical protein markers and signaling pathways; however, the prognostic relevance of many of these proteins remains unclear.

Methods

We determined the prognostic implications of the functional proteome in 263 CRC tumor samples from patients treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) and 462 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to identify patterns of protein expression that drive tumorigenesis. A total of 163 validated proteins were analyzed by reverse phase protein array (RPPA). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the tumor proteins from the MDACC cohort was performed, and clustering was validated using RPPA data from TCGA CRC. Cox regression was used to identify predictors of tumor recurrence.

Results

Clustering revealed dichotomization, with subtype A notable for a high epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) protein signature, while subtype B was notable for high Akt/TSC/mTOR pathway components. Survival data were only available for the MDACC cohort and were used to evaluate prognostic relevance of these protein signatures. Group B demonstrated worse relapse-free survival (hazard ratio 2.11, 95% confidence interval 1.04–4.27, p = 0.039), although there was no difference in known genomic drivers between the two proteomic groups. Proteomic grouping and stage were significant predictors of recurrence on multivariate analysis. Eight proteins were found to be significant predictors of tumor recurrence on multivariate analysis: Collagen VI, FOXO3a, INPP4B, LcK, phospho-PEA15, phospho-PRAS40, Rad51, phospho-S6.

Conclusion

CRC can be classified into distinct subtypes by proteomic features independent of common oncogenic driver mutations. Proteomic analysis has identified key biomarkers with prognostic importance, however these findings require further validation in an independent cohort.
Literature
1.
The Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 2012;487:330–7.CrossRefPubMedCentral
2.
Zhang B, Wang J, Wang X, et al. Proteogenomic characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 2014;513:382–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Pounds S, Morris SW. Estimating the occurrence of false positives and false negatives in microarray studies by approximating and partitioning the empirical distribution of p-values. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1236–42.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Segal E, Friedman N, Koller D, Regev A. A module map showing conditional activity of expression modules in cancer. Nat Genet. 2004;36:1090–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Margolin AA, Nemenman I, Basso K, et al. ARACNE: an algorithm for the reconstruction of gene regulatory networks in a mammalian cellular context. BMC Bioinform. 2006;7(Suppl 1):S7.CrossRef
6.
Wang K, Saito M, Bisikirska BC, et al. Genome-wide identification of post-translational modulators of transcription factor activity in human B cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27:829–39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Akbani R, Ng PK, Werner HM, et al. A pan-cancer proteomic perspective on The Cancer Genome Atlas. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3887.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Li J, Lu Y, Akbani R, et al. TCPA: a resource for cancer functional proteomics data. Nat Methods 2013;10:1046–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Miller TW, Rexer BN, Garrett JT, Arteaga CL. Mutations in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway: role in tumor progression and therapeutic implications in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13:224.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Chen P, Cescon M, Bonaldo P. Collagen VI in cancer and its biological mechanisms. Trends Mol Med. 2013;19:410–7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Dennison JB, Shahmoradgoli M, Liu W, et al. High intratumoral stromal content defines reactive breast cancer as a low-risk breast cancer subtype. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:5068–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Dalerba P, Maccalli C, Casati C, et al. Immunology and immunotherapy of colorectal cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003;46:33–57.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Jass JR. Lymphocytic infiltration and survival in rectal cancer. J Clin Pathol. 1986;39:585–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Ropponen KM, Eskelinen MJ, Lipponen PK et al. Prognostic value of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in colorectal cancer. J Pathol. 1997;182:318–24.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Tennstedt P, Fresow R, Simon R, et al. RAD51 overexpression is a negative prognostic marker for colorectal adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer 2013;132:2118–26.CrossRefPubMed