Skip to main content

Radiation Safety in X-Ray Densitometry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bone Densitometry in Clinical Practice

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Practice ((CCP))

  • 1440 Accesses

Abstract

Radiologists involved in the practice of densitometry have considerable background in radiation safety issues. This is not necessarily true for the non-radiologist physician densitometrist. Although radiation safety issues are not a major concern in the practice of densitometry, it is wise for the physician to be familiar with basic aspects of radiation safety, relating to protection of the public and protection of the technologist. This chapter is primarily intended for the non-radiologist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The system of units known as Le Systeme International d’Unites, or SI, and considered the preferred method of expressing scientific quantities.

  2. 2.

    The Gray is named for Louis Gray (1905–1965), one of the creators of the Bragg-Gray theory used in radiation therapy.

  3. 3.

    The Sievert is named for Rolf Maximilian Sievert (1896–1966), a Swedish medical physicist and founding member of the International Committee on Radiation Protection.

  4. 4.

    When expressed as mSv, the lifetime cumulative dose for a radiation worker should not exceed 10 × age in years.

References

  1. Bushong SC. Concepts of radiation. In: Bushong SC, editor. Radiologic science for technologists. St. Louis: Mosby; 1993: 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Protection. In: Curry TS, Dowdey JE, Murry RC, editors. Christensen’s physics of diagnostic radiology. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1990: 372–391.

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. [NCRP Report No. 93], 1–86.1993. Bethesda, NCRP. Recommendations of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kalendar WA. Effective dose values in bone mineral measurements by photon absorptiometry and computed tomography. Osteoporos Int 1992; 2:82–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Limitation of exposure to ionizing radiation. [NCRP Report No. 116], 1–88. 1993. Bethesda, NCRP. Recommendations of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements.

    Google Scholar 

  6. ICRP. 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. [ICRP Publication 103]. Ann ICRP 2007; 37:1–332.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Information on file. Alara, Inc., 2545 Barrington Court, Hayward, CA 94545.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bushong SC. Early effects of radiation. In: Bushong SC, editor. Radiologic science for technologists. St. Louis: Mosby; 1993: 559–576.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Njeh CR, Fuerst T, Hans D, Blake GM, and Genant HK. Radiation exposure in bone mineral density assessment. Appl Radiat Isot 1999; 50:215–236.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lewis MD, Blake GM, Fogelman I. Patient dose in dual X-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int 1994; 1:11–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Patel R, Lewis MD, Blake GM, Batchelor S, et al. New generation DXA scanners increase dose to patient and staff. In: Current Research in Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Measurement IV. London: British Institute of Radiology, 1996: 99.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lloyd T, Eggli DF, Miller KL, Eggli KD, Dodson WC. Radiation dose from DXA scanning to reproductive tissues of females. J Clin Densitom 1998; 1:379–383.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Damilakis J, Perisinakis K, Vrahoriti H, et al. Embryo/fetus radiation dose and risk from dual X-ray absorptiometry examinations. Osteoporos Int 2002; 13(9):716–722.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Patel R, Blake GM, Batchelor S, Fogelman I. Occupational dose to the radiographer in dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison of pencil-beam and fan-beam systems. Br J Radiol 1996; 69:539–543.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sydney Lou Bonnick MD, FACP .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bonnick, S.L. (2010). Radiation Safety in X-Ray Densitometry. In: Bone Densitometry in Clinical Practice. Current Clinical Practice. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-499-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-499-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60327-498-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60327-499-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics