Abstract
With great interest, we carefully read a meta-analysis entitled “MT1-MMP is not a good prognosticator of cancer survival: evidence from 11 studies” in Tumor Biology (by Wu KP et al.), in which the investigators aimed to assess the association between MT1-MMP expression and prognosis of patients with various types of cancers by calculating the pooled hazard ratio (HR) with corresponding 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI). They have reached an important conclusion that MT1-MMP overexpression indicated an unfavorable overall survival (OS) in cancers and the pooled HR (95 % CI) was 2.46 (95 % CI 1.75–3.47). In addition, subgroup analysis showed the HRs (95 % CI) were 3.73 (95 % CI 2.67–5.21) and 2.46 (95 % CI 1.69–3.59) for MT1-MMP in lung cancer and gastric cancer, respectively. Before these results can be accepted, we would like to address several concerns related to this meta-analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wu KP, Li Q, Lin FX, et al. MT1-MMP is not a good prognosticator of cancer survival: evidence from 11 studies. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(12):12489–95.
Yoshizaki T, Maruyama Y, Sato H, et al. Expression of tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-2 correlates with activation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and predicts poor prognosis in tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2001;95(1):44–50.
Massi D, Franchi A, Ketabchi S, et al. Expression and prognostic significance of matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors in primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin. Hum Pathol. 2003;34(1):80–8.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tu, C., Zhou, J. & Yuan, L. Letter regarding “MT1-MMP is not a good prognosticator of cancer survival: evidence from 11 studies” by Wu KP et al.. Tumor Biol. 37, 5761–5763 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-016-4910-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-016-4910-8